Here is why it's consistent to keep polygamy illegal, but gay marriage legal

Beliathon

hero member

Activity: 784

Merit: 1000

https://youtu.be/PZm8TTLR2NU

Quote from: eaglerock on July 07, 2015, 10:48:41 AM

Quote from: albalinux on July 07, 2015, 09:51:19 AM

Some was true of inter-racial marriage, a Black man could marry a black women, but not a white women.

Racial discrimination and gender discrimination are not allowed.

Now we will see if religious discrimination is allowed in the polygamy fight.

Biologically, it would appear that a minstrating 12 year old would be an adult. While most of us agree today they are not mature enough, what is to stop this from being the next barrier in the future? Same sex is a perversion of our natural state, yet it exist now. As perverted as it is to think of a 12 year old getting married, what's to stop this perversion in the future?

Nothing can stop perversion, because all humans are perverts. Just truth asserting itself over myths.

jeckman

newbie

Activity: 35

Merit: 0

Quote from: rodzimajid on July 07, 2015, 09:31:08 AM

I think a more valid fight would be religious discrimination

why should a Christin marriage be honored, but not a Mormon one

we all know Christians pushed anti-polygamy laws because of their original hatred of Mormons

Christian's fears at the time were that Mormons would out populate them

And that just means that the government has to meet a burden to justify this discriminatory treatment as meeting a secular purpose beyond any historic animus. It does not mean it cannot be done.

abasin

member

Activity: 84

Merit: 10

Quote from: redandblack on July 07, 2015, 11:00:41 AM

No need to because polygamy is illegal for everyone.

No, if Utah makes it legal, then it is legal for people who choose to get married in Utah. Therefore using your own logic, it must be legal in every state.

redandblack

member

Activity: 70

Merit: 10

Quote from: abasin on July 07, 2015, 10:55:53 AM

So all we need is for utah to make polygamy legal, and every state has to follow suit?

No need to because polygamy is illegal for everyone.

krenare

newbie

Activity: 22

Merit: 0

Quote from: redandblack on July 07, 2015, 08:24:58 AM

I've been seeing both sides of the debate when it comes to polygamy. The anti-gay marriage crowd asked a fair question - if the definition of marriage can change from one man/woman to man/man or woman/woman, on what grounds can polygamy be denied given it is involving consenting adults.

The pro gay-marriage crowd (playing damage control a bit) would dismiss the question or simply state polgamy is not in big demand. But either response was deflecting from the question.

Last night, after about four IPAs, I actually figured it out.

When marriage is denied to gays, it is denying a person something than another person has a legal right to.

But in making polygamy illegal, it is discriminating against everyone - including gays, straights, men and women. Therefore, in a skewed way, there is no one excluded from the anti-polygamy law because it is forbidden to all.

Okay, it sounds good. But what about the old argument that marriage was not forbidden to gays before the SCOTUS ruled. They could still marry. Marriage to another same sex couple was forbidden to all, everyone regardless of orientation. No one could marry someone of their own gender, no matter what or throw in any caveat. One could say under the old system, all it did was treat men as men and women as women, with marriage allowed to only one man and one woman.

Personally, I have said this until I am blue in the face. Get government out of marriage. Only those who want to get married and are of consenting age, let them marry whom ever they want and how many they want. Let the people actually involved decide, not government.

abasin

member

Activity: 84

Merit: 10

Quote from: redandblack on July 07, 2015, 10:07:44 AM

No, because no specific individual is given a right to polygamy over another.

The argument from your quote clearly discriminated against those who wanted to marry the same gender. But in the case of polygamy, no one can be in a marriage of more than two - be they straight or gay, man or woman. It's precicesly because polygamy is outlawed for everyone that it doesn't discriminate against anyone.

So all we need is for utah to make polygamy legal, and every state has to follow suit?

eaglerock

newbie

Activity: 23

Merit: 0

Quote from: albalinux on July 07, 2015, 09:51:19 AM

Some was true of inter-racial marriage, a Black man could marry a black women, but not a white women.

Racial discrimination and gender discrimination are not allowed.

Now we will see if religious discrimination is allowed in the polygamy fight.

Biologically, it would appear that a minstrating 12 year old would be an adult. While most of us agree today they are not mature enough, what is to stop this from being the next barrier in the future? Same sex is a perversion of our natural state, yet it exist now. As perverted as it is to think of a 12 year old getting married, what's to stop this perversion in the future?

Wilikon

legendary

Activity: 1176

Merit: 1001

minds.com/Wilikon

Quote from: redandblack on July 07, 2015, 10:07:44 AM

Quote from: abasin on July 07, 2015, 10:05:24 AM

Isn't this the same basic argument that goes "anybody can get married, so long as you marry somebody of the opposite sex"?

No, because no specific individual is given a right to polygamy over another.

The argument from your quote clearly discriminated against those who wanted to marry the same gender. But in the case of polygamy, no one can be in a marriage of more than two - be they straight or gay, man or woman. It's precicesly because polygamy is outlawed for everyone that it doesn't discriminate against anyone.

Because polygamy is illegal for all, polygamy relationships do not exist? because gay marriage was illegal (in some states), homosexual relationships did not exist? Because interracial marriage was illegal, there were not case of black/white relationships?

A marriage is a contract. The dude has to marry at least one woman. The other wife is left with less rights than the real wife. Both women are happy, have children, live under the same roof.
Why would anyone deny equal justice to both women, letting the real wife have all the rights once the husband dies? Because it is justice? Because it is the law?

Everyone in this situation is an adult. Gay adults should be happy, but not polygamists? Are you saying polygamists are less 'adult' than gays and should not be able to know and define what love is?

By the way, "government cannot define love" is pretty much the justice's conclusion for ssm. But you are saying in the case of polygamists government SHOULD definitely define what love is because love is defined the same for everyone else... Is it?

Give it time. Now that the supreme justices gave themselves the power to write new laws I don't see how people like you with infinite amount of IPAs can stop the legalization of polygamy in the future.

Lethn

legendary

Activity: 1540

Merit: 1000

Quote from: Nora12322 on July 07, 2015, 09:18:53 AM

Its the same. Gay marriage is destructive to children and the family unit. So is polygamy.

I posted up very conclusive data to show that's complete bullshit, if that's all your argument is against gay and polygmal marriage then you really need to find something new to get angry about.

See this thread: https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.11801993

Like Bryant, I suspect you assholes will completely ignore it in favour of repeating yourself to other people that might believe you.

Tusk

sr. member

Activity: 444

Merit: 260

There is no harm to kids being raised by gay couples, There are many cases of men and women who had children in their youth and later came out of the closet, divorced and raised their kids in gay relationships who turned out to be healthy and hetero. The morality brigade should rather worry about why society should tolerate people think they have the right to interfere with others lifestyles.

redandblack

member

Activity: 70

Merit: 10

Quote from: abasin on July 07, 2015, 10:05:24 AM

Isn't this the same basic argument that goes "anybody can get married, so long as you marry somebody of the opposite sex"?

No, because no specific individual is given a right to polygamy over another.

The argument from your quote clearly discriminated against those who wanted to marry the same gender. But in the case of polygamy, no one can be in a marriage of more than two - be they straight or gay, man or woman. It's precicesly because polygamy is outlawed for everyone that it doesn't discriminate against anyone.

abasin

member

Activity: 84

Merit: 10

Quote from: redandblack on July 07, 2015, 08:24:58 AM

But in making polygamy illegal, it is discriminating against everyone - including gays, straights, men and women. Therefore, in a skewed way, there is no one excluded from the anti-polygamy law because it is forbidden to all.

Isn't this the same basic argument that goes "anybody can get married, so long as you marry somebody of the opposite sex"?

redandblack

member

Activity: 70

Merit: 10

It's obvious most of you guys didn't read my OP.

Name me one person who is allowed to be in a polygamous marriage. You can't because it's illegal for everyone. Therefore, it is not like gay marriage at all. Marriage was a right denied to some individuals, but not all. But in the case of polygamy, it's illegal for everyone - be they straight, gay, man or woman.

ObscureBean

legendary

Activity: 1148

Merit: 1000

I'm not against either but it is clear that polygamy would add a whole new dimension to complexity as a whole. It is impossible to accurately predict the effects of polygamy on humanity in the long term but right off the bat, you can expect a strong shift toward more intricate versions of control and power. A system that sees more than 2 persons in an intimate setting over a long period of time will unavoidably resort to 'right of power' (power in any way, shape or form) to stabilize itself.

albalinux

newbie

Activity: 16

Merit: 0

Quote from: eaglerock on July 07, 2015, 09:32:54 AM

I don't recall gays being denied the same rights as heteros to marry the opposite sex, which is our natural state.

Some was true of inter-racial marriage, a Black man could marry a black women, but not a white women.

Racial discrimination and gender discrimination are not allowed.

Now we will see if religious discrimination is allowed in the polygamy fight.

saddampbuh

legendary

Activity: 1078

Merit: 1014

Quote from: redandblack on July 07, 2015, 08:24:58 AM

When marriage is denied to gays, it is denying a person something than another person has a legal right to.

no its not. normal and homosexual people both have the right to marry someone from the opposite sex.

eaglerock

newbie

Activity: 23

Merit: 0

I don't recall gays being denied the same rights as heteros to marry the opposite sex, which is our natural state.

I want to know what right you have telling a minstrel 12 year old from marrying a 80 year old man. Are we making a moral judgement when preventing it? Resisting gay marriage was just another moral judgment that happen to have a natural backing.

rodzimajid

member

Activity: 70

Merit: 10

I think a more valid fight would be religious descrimnation

why should a Christin marriage be honored, but not a Mormon one

we all know Christians pushed anti-polygamy laws because of their original hatred of Mormons

Christian's fears at the time were that Mormons would out populate them

Nora12322

newbie

Activity: 26

Merit: 0

Its the same. Gay marriage is destructive to children and the family unit. So is polygamy.

shevon

newbie

Activity: 35

Merit: 0

Quote from: redandblack on July 07, 2015, 08:24:58 AM

I've been seeing both sides of the debate when it comes to polygamy. The anti-gay marriage crowd asked a fair question - if the definition of marriage can change from one man/woman to man/man or woman/woman, on what grounds can polygamy be denied given it is involving consenting adults.

The pro gay-marriage crowd (playing damage control a bit) would dismiss the question or simply state polgamy is not in big demand. But either response was deflecting from the question.

Last night, after about four IPAs, I actually figured it out.

When marriage is denied to gays, it is denying a person something than another person has a legal right to.

But in making polygamy illegal, it is discriminating against everyone - including gays, straights, men and women. Therefore, in a skewed way, there is no one excluded from the anti-polygamy law because it is forbidden to all.

You make a strong point. The only thing I'd add is that there is a third response from supporters of same-sex marriage. Many of us went on record as being perfectly comfortable with polygamy.

Topic: Here is why it's consistent to keep polygamy illegal, but gay marriage legal (Read 867 times)