Hey idiots & low iqs; This is a nuclear bomb... - page 2.

BurtW

legendary

Activity: 2646

Merit: 1138

All paid signature campaigns should be banned.

Quote from: Masha Sha on April 15, 2017, 12:25:11 AM

So i have no idea how big is a 50kt explosion.

For comparison:

Mark 1 – "Little Boy" gun-type uranium weapon (used against Hiroshima). (13–18 kilotons, 1945–1950)
Mark 3 – "Fat Man" plutonium implosion weapon (used against Nagasaki), effectively the same at the "Gadget" device used in the Trinity (nuclear test) with minor design differences. (21 kilotons, 1945–1950)

So more than Hiroshima and Nagasaki combined.

But it can be "dialed back" to only 5 or 10 kilotons.

BurtW

legendary

Activity: 2646

Merit: 1138

All paid signature campaigns should be banned.

There is a lot about the actual bomb here:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/B61_nuclear_bomb

This is also very interesting and terrifying:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_nuclear_weapons

Sakura_nakomoto

newbie

Activity: 40

Merit: 0

Quote from: ?? on ??

Quote from: Barrymore on April 15, 2017, 03:55:51 AM

You contradict yourself. On the one hand you do not want nuclear weapons because it can destroy the whole world, and on the other hand you are opposed to destroy the enemy until he has a chance to destroy the world.

That is the type of thinking that lead to WW2 and every other war.

You are a little mistaken. Because the Second World War has already taken place. The third world war is on the turn. But it will still happen.

olushakes

sr. member

Activity: 476

Merit: 254

Quote from: darkseid1199 on April 15, 2017, 03:08:28 AM

Isn't it ironic that we try to achieve peace by having weapons that can obliterate the world in a matter of minutes.

Its really ironic and annoying that in the guise of protecting ourselves we turned into monsters that create weapons of massive destruction within minutes as you have rightly stated there but we forgot that even our lives is even worthwhile and interesting with the existence of our perceived enemies. The question that bothers me, is to what end exactly? Citizens across the world are still complaining of lack but the leaders deem it fit to invest the resources in creating weapons.

grermezter

sr. member

Activity: 434

Merit: 250

Quote from: Barrymore on April 15, 2017, 03:55:51 AM

Quote from: darkseid1199 on April 15, 2017, 03:08:28 AM

Isn't it ironic that we try to achieve peace by having weapons that can obliterate the world in a matter of minutes.

You contradict yourself. On the one hand you do not want nuclear weapons because it can destroy the whole world, and on the other hand you are opposed to destroy the enemy until he has a chance to destroy the world.

I don't think he is contradicting himself he is just saying that it's ironic and maybe hypocritical for people to use weapons that kill and causes mass destruction as a means to bring peace whiles dialogue and reasoning is the best option

tvbcof

legendary

Activity: 4760

Merit: 1283

Quote from: Spendulus on April 15, 2017, 12:04:05 PM

The illustration clearly shows the dial-in-power of the B61 being used to hit a military target next to a city with the city being unaffected. Just clarifying. I'm not in favor of these weapons or of war.

The media and sock puppet armies of the United States of Zionism have been trying to justify in the minds of the sheeple the use tactical nukes for a while now. They are 'Clean and Green'! Just have to set the dial correctly and that's all there is to it. American made nukes are humane and wonderful while Russian and Iranian nukes are bad bad WMD's.

Frankly, nukes of any type obsolete. Biological and psychological weapons are where it's at as far as legacy un-enhanced humans are concerned. I'm glad to be a relative mongrel genetically and ideologically speaking. Could be and advantage or a dis-advantage depending on how things play out.

Slow death

legendary

Activity: 3262

Merit: 1130

Leading Crypto Sports Betting & Casino Platform

Quote from: Spendulus on April 15, 2017, 12:04:05 PM

Quote from: gabmen on April 15, 2017, 07:10:52 AM

Quote from: Barrymore on April 15, 2017, 03:55:51 AM

Quote from: darkseid1199 on April 15, 2017, 03:08:28 AM

Isn't it ironic that we try to achieve peace by having weapons that can obliterate the world in a matter of minutes.

You contradict yourself. On the one hand you do not want nuclear weapons because it can destroy the whole world, and on the other hand you are opposed to destroy the enemy until he has a chance to destroy the world.

Either way, the world and the innocent people in it would take most of the effect these nukes are going to bring out. It's going to be a continuous process if we think that violence would resolve anything. Just look at what's happening in the middle east. The people that are most affected with the offensive against these terrorists are the people that should have been protected. We're doing more damage to them than the terrorists are

The illustration clearly shows the dial-in-power of the B61 being used to hit a military target next to a city with the city being unaffected.

I was frightened thinking that some city was destroyed with nuclear bomb, in the end it is a training and nobody was injured.

" Hey idiots & low iqs; This is a nuclear bomb..."

Do not keep scaring us

Spendulus

legendary

Activity: 2926

Merit: 1386

Quote from: gabmen on April 15, 2017, 07:10:52 AM

Quote from: Barrymore on April 15, 2017, 03:55:51 AM

Quote from: darkseid1199 on April 15, 2017, 03:08:28 AM

Isn't it ironic that we try to achieve peace by having weapons that can obliterate the world in a matter of minutes.

You contradict yourself. On the one hand you do not want nuclear weapons because it can destroy the whole world, and on the other hand you are opposed to destroy the enemy until he has a chance to destroy the world.

Either way, the world and the innocent people in it would take most of the effect these nukes are going to bring out. It's going to be a continuous process if we think that violence would resolve anything. Just look at what's happening in the middle east. The people that are most affected with the offensive against these terrorists are the people that should have been protected. We're doing more damage to them than the terrorists are

The illustration clearly shows the dial-in-power of the B61 being used to hit a military target next to a city with the city being unaffected. Just clarifying. I'm not in favor of these weapons or of war.

gabmen

hero member

Activity: 1246

Merit: 529

CryptoTalk.Org - Get Paid for every Post!

Quote from: Barrymore on April 15, 2017, 03:55:51 AM

Quote from: darkseid1199 on April 15, 2017, 03:08:28 AM

Isn't it ironic that we try to achieve peace by having weapons that can obliterate the world in a matter of minutes.

You contradict yourself. On the one hand you do not want nuclear weapons because it can destroy the whole world, and on the other hand you are opposed to destroy the enemy until he has a chance to destroy the world.

Either way, the world and the innocent people in it would take most of the effect these nukes are going to bring out. It's going to be a continuous process if we think that violence would resolve anything. Just look at what's happening in the middle east. The people that are most affected with the offensive against these terrorists are the people that should have been protected. We're doing more damage to them than the terrorists are

Barrymore

member

Activity: 84

Merit: 10

Quote from: darkseid1199 on April 15, 2017, 03:08:28 AM

Isn't it ironic that we try to achieve peace by having weapons that can obliterate the world in a matter of minutes.

You contradict yourself. On the one hand you do not want nuclear weapons because it can destroy the whole world, and on the other hand you are opposed to destroy the enemy until he has a chance to destroy the world.

darkseid1199

full member

Activity: 126

Merit: 100

Isn't it ironic that we try to achieve peace by having weapons that can obliterate the world in a matter of minutes.

Masha Sha

sr. member

Activity: 560

Merit: 252

So i have no idea how big is a 50kt explosion. But this bomb is very small in size... can you understand the trend?

And this lead me to say that all those that support people like putin & co, those faking power weak dying men (all will die), are a problem to me and the earth.

Yes those type of munitions are necessary against "Power"men, however why isn't a better world worked on?

Spin your bullshit to defend them as you want mad(&dying)servants of those men... and the worst is that by defending them you will pay her dinner... she would eat the bones of her children if there was daimond in it...

Western civilization is a humanist vision in which Roman law integrated Jesus wisdom, thereby giving Western culture its distinctive character: freedom of speech and of the press, equal justice under law, the primacy of the individual, separation of religion and state, freedom of religion and from religion, property rights, sexual equality, an independent judiciary, and independent education, among other values, like clean natural nutrishious food, pure water, clean air, and formost respect and love for the biospheres.

Sadly, there are still a lot of barbarians around, one disctinctive feature is: personnality cult for men and women (the concept of honor, dignity, liberty or duty are relegated to their servitude to their leader (alive or dead). Another word for barbarians in subhumans, sadly they even with all their weakness still learn how to make and use weapons.

And this is why or they become human (they all can) or must be killed fisrt.

Topic: Hey idiots & low iqs; This is a nuclear bomb... - page 2. (Read 1885 times)