Topic: Hhampuz being campaign manager of casinos with no adress or license - page 2. (Read 1545 times)

I can see that thule has made a valid point concerning double standards. I see no possible refutation of that part.

If you can explain how the double standards concern is baseless then I am interested to see what you will present.

Double standards are always worth pointing out since they demonstrate lack of judgement or willful untrustworthy behaviour.

From what I can see Hhampuz is not a trust abuser directly but will still willfully support those that do abuse the trust system. He is more tolerable than the direct abusers themselves but he enables them to abuse so still needs to be held accountable.

If you support those persons on DT that will give out red on a "suspicion" or for a "possible" scam or even just to those that present unpopular facts that happen to be the TRUTH then you behaviour should be judged against those standards.

All he wants is attention. He makes baseless accusations against someone to start an arguement. Once they stop replying/lose interest he moves onto the next person. Treat him like a chihuahua, just ignore him and he'll stop barking ¯\_(ツ)_/¯.

Wow you really tick all the boxes for an unsecure narcissist.

Why this compulsive need to compare yourself to others (myself in that case).

I couldn't give a damn that you uncovered a scam in your life. Cool story bro. Thank you for your service. The fact you need to tell everyone every chance you got shows what kind of a person you are.

What do you expect? To be thanked every day of your life for what you did? Grow up man.

You do things because of what you  believe in, not for others admiration or w/e.

I kinda feel pitty for you.

11.... definitely a fucking 11 TS (breaks the scale)

Let's make some clear points because it seems some soda went up to your head

tagging someone as non DT is like leaving shit.He doesn't care.DT members posted enough times that taggs from regular members can be ignored as they mean shit. POINT


You have each time an issue with that when asked to act appropiote as DT member handling everyone equal which you are clearly like most DT members not doing


I have exposed more real scams than you ever did.What you do is peanuts.I have at least guts and exposed the #3 coin at that time Quark being a scam or Eric GU from Metaverse,Zengold etc scamming his investors for over 10.000 BTC filling police reports taking actions with chinese community and so on.
What did you do ?

Yes i'm talking about legit or can you show me a single person on that forum who claims i cheated on him ?You as DT members have to uphold rules and standards which you clearly arent doing


Defamation is a claim which is not true.Since you claim its defamation show me a single point of mine which is not true



Wrong you are DT1 just because of the people merited you for your actions in the past but not because your judgement is good.I can show people who got nearly 200 merits in a single month and know shit about the forum or its members or standards.You were just lucky to have gained merit where everyone else stated its useless shit.


No you only search on topic where you can get merits like a merit whore.Uncomfortable topics are nothing for you as you could be easily excluded anytime.
Since you joined that topic with your BS here you got some truth about yourself.[/list]


How much time have you already spent on that thread ?You could have checked my claims already 10 times.

SO you thing people tag only when they are on DT? You missed the whole point of what the trust network is. Why should anyone add YOU to one's trust list if you don't post any feedback.



Never said I had an issue with it.


Demanding is all you seem to do.
When it comes to do something right by your own, you are nowhere to find.


Talking about legit


This is defamation. It shows, again, that you are NOT legit but only yapping around.

---

And to set this straight for the 10th time at least.

I am DT1 because

• People think my judgement is good, at least the one used for my posted feedbacks
• My trust list is accurate, and the people I added in it are worth being on DT2

This doesn't mean I have to do extensive research on every user I come accross in the forum.
You should wrap your head around this, and eventually gtfo if you do not like how this place is run.

I would tagg them but i'm not on default.
If you have an issue beng a DT you can step out any time like Marlborza did.

If you are DT i demand to uphold the same standards on the forum for everyone
I know you are on this forum very short time but let me tell you that forum and crypto was created so every individual would have a guarantee to be treated like anybody else.

You have enough time to post daily but you have not 5 minutes to check my claim.

Shows how legit your posts are

DT is not a job. It comes with exactly 0 obligations and duties.

Maybe you should read again how and why someone becomes DT.

Edit: Also there are some DTs and other member of the forum doing exactly THAT.

If you believe this is the right thing to do, stop whining and do it yourself ffs.

Why don't DT members do the same on ICO scams ?But handle it intern in the forum ?
Again diffrent standards ?

@Thule if you really want to do something about it, you should just use a whois service and contact abuse@ the domain provider with evidence backing your allegations.

If it is solid enough, sites will get suspended.

Go to your local police station then.

Any of the world.

I am clearly saying that you are a person who SUPPORTS those that do FAR worse.
Exclude those that do run around painting accounts red for pointing out the fact they are liars then I can take you more seriously.
You openly support in DT some of the most shady individuals here. You also happen to exclude the same persons.

I am not saying you are as bad as they are. However even supporting these types opens you up to criticisms that would otherwise perhaps have no grounding.

If you do NOT support red trusting persons on NON scamming issues then that is different. Please demonstrate this by excluding proven trust abusers and proven liars who go much further and use red trust to silence the truth of their wrong doing being spoken.

Campaign managers are in a very precarious position when you think about this because their behaviour reflects upon 1/ the project and their choice to hire you, 2/ the investors in those projects (if icos I mean any project using someone who openly supports liars, trust abusers, and other such shady events in their history clearly are not doing their research)  3/ the sig spammers who rely on payments.

So any mud that sticks to a campaign manager not only damages them it damages the project that chooses to use them. If projects were made aware of this but still decided to use their services then that could look even worse for them.

I would distance myself from any persons that have observable events in their history that casts them in a very untrustworthy light. I would certainly not be seen to advocate their placement in a trust system and also collude to exclude those persons they exclude.

It is not only the actions you take that reflect upon you, it is also the actions of those that you openly support and seemingly condone on the one hand then wonder why people are questioning your double standards when you seem very willing to wait for proof of scam when it benefits you financially.

Eventually those that seem entrenched in the DT and merit cycle of power will start to lose their grasp on such power and those that thought it prudent to support them will regret it,  that will always be their in their post history.

That laudas cat club thread or whatever (that you started) was funny but i think that club needs to realise they must undo their trust abuse and clean up their act else that club has no future here except to be made pariahs.

Then you should have waited, and gathered evidence first. Once you do and your evidence is posted, I will be the first to back you.



Or maybe they are just commiting tax evasion, or don't want to do any paper work while still offering a legit and fair game.


Maybe you should have posted in investigation board. People might have looked into you and helped you.

I don't know about the other DT's, for my part I have no time to actually check for it by myself.


Says who?


The law of which country?

You know asche i'm going to document it when i have a bit more time.Remember i don't make a dime out of this forum and need to make some preparations for may which is very soon.

I just would like to know how does it come that you approve double standards ?
I mean DT members had no issues with a group of DT members tagging projects which have no adress no company info or anything and described them because of that as scam.
Here the online casinos which could get easily a company registration on an island are not providing any info at all.They hide 100% .
Why don't you demand the same actions of these DT members like on the other projects ?

I mean if you run with open eyes you can clearly see why they have no company information or license number because they are not running a "fair game" system but are intended to milk their members with unfair games displaying opportunities which in reality are manufactured by their unfair game system.


Why don't you have the same standard here ?

I mean when somebody claims a project is cheating normaly tons of DT's instantly check for evidences.
Here you can see not a single DT even tries to find any evidence since its not in their intention.


The decent DT's on this forum haven't posted a word on this thread which i personly take as a silent confirmation of my opinion.


Or take a global mod from that thread which is supporting these people with actions he is not supposed to do as mod.

One example is i posted the info on Hhampuz campaign that the website is by law ilegal because thats the truth nobody can deny.
Would i post it on any other ico you can bet this statement wouldn't be deleted.
But maybe you can tell me why the post was inappropiote informing people about the website that it has no info at all ?

It's called business protection...

C'mon Thule stop this non sense.

Even if you were right, why just write about it like some mad kid. Gather data, document it, and PROVE it.

Writting that it has been proven doesn't mean it is. Are you 10 yo?!

@CH, again you seem to confuse me with someone who runs around calling out scams and painting accounts red.. This is not me so how is it double standards? My trust list is my business, just as yours is your business.

@hulla

If someone does something that is proven untrustworthy and you know this to be the case yet you still promote them or enable them into positions of trust that therefore shows bad character.

This though was just my disclaimer and not really attached to main and relevant part of my post.

The point that I make about the double standards NOT just of Hhampuz but actually more in relation to the noob ass licking trash who oppose waiting for proof of scam or at a minimum a solid case to suggest STRONGLY intention of scam before red trusting who are now claiming there is no proof of scam here.

You either want to wait for proof of scam or else you are going to make preemptive red strikes against those you think are displaying behaviours that suggest they could intend to scam. For instance masking their ID's/addresses to limit and prevent any retribution IF they do scam.

I am of the opinion that one should wait for EVIDENCE or PROOF of scam before giving the scam tag or some behaviour that STRONGLY suggests intent to scam. However hhampuz supports clearly red tagging for merely speaking the truth about his pals as he has openly supported them with his inclusions and also some of his prior posts.

So that's where we are. Double standards, supporting proven liars, proven and self confessed trust abusers, and now working with and supporting/promoting/being paid by "possibly" dubious projects himself.

I mean this is a debate so people are free to make their rebuttals to my posts. I welcome them and any debate on these types of issues.

Whatever you want to discuss here, I recommend you to use snip, ~snip~, -snip-, ~, < ... >, whatever you want to eliminate un-used part of posts' contents that you want to discuss with.
Only quote exactly part of contents you want to discuss.
It will help to save more space in page and help readers easier to known which points you really want to discuss with posts' authors.

This is not an accusations or what so ever. What I'm trying to point out is that I don't see any reason why you still have to create a thread if your planned was not about creating some drama despite Hhampuz respond to your claim. However, crypto community don't mind a project with good record which didn't provide any information than giving false information and I'm saying this because I have seen a ICO project which didn't provide any information but provide good record and the investors are fine with it.

if you guys have a problem with Hhampuz take it out on him not the project he handle.

h
When six people agreed with something, what can a single man do to oppose it? When we both know that  majority win vote under majority rule and last time I checked Hhampuz didn't give you any red trust. Why should be blame for the what others did?