Hhampuz, it is a waste of time to argue with some who won't be transparent but demands it from others.
I would suggest locking this thread and pointing it to a new self moderated one.
shut up asskisser vod, we know you believe in transparency of OTHER PEOPLES ADDRESSES that is certainly UNTRUSTWORTHY
However you did provide an EXCELLENT explanation of why honest and trustworthy members may decide it wise to post under alt accounts.
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.50915510So rather than just being a total ass licking dreg like you and NOT DO THE RIGHT THING and facilitate scammers like you are doing by not daring to speak up to preserve your own account. Some MAY decide to create proxy accounts to shield their accounts from the TRUST ABUSE you facilitate and still DO THE RIGHT THING AND SPEAK UP.
This relates strongly to hhampuz because as we can see he supported your doxing of a forum treasurer (UNTRUSTWORTHY) and is now refusing to be transparent over his own actions which actually could relate directly to corruption, collusion on initial distributions of tokens and outright scamming.
It is not important WHO delivers observable instances. Only that you can validate them yourselves without knowing who supplied those instances. It is important to know WHY you are accepted or denied earning on the board and how that compares to how OTHERS are accepted and denied.
These are semi complex concepts vod so get someone to explain them to you if you are still having trouble seeing the clear difference.
Hhampuz needs to be transparent so we can see if he is being fair or if he is corrupt and accepting kick backs or is involved in the gaming and market making of new projects. If he will not be transparent why do we need him? we can just use campaign managers that will be transparent and demonstrate they are being fair and not leading to narrow initial distributions that can be gamed .
Try to engage and debate the real issues not try to avoid them and make personal attacks. Makes you look weak and unable to make any rebuttal to the central points. That is pretty much like admitting you agree with us or refuse to but can not present a case as to why