Last days we witnessed a 20% crash in bitcoin, not to sepak about other crypto, including ETH that had the most solid growth till then.
These anomalies, as good as they might be for day traders, does not speak well about the BTC as a reserve currency.
As I said before, there's a reason why paper money was pegged to gold prices and reserves. Because any currency needs a reference value if it is going to avoid those dramatic ups and downs. The euphemism of USDT is just out of question.
And even though I'm strongly against any regulation of BTC or any other crypto, I have to say, leaving it freely float poses dangers such those I said, plus manipulations of speculators who can, by their own operations, affect prices at will.
So, I will insist that crypto needs a value reference. And as I said in my other posts, the best reference value is ENERGY. The most pure asset in the universe
As to me, that's sheer nonsense
And it is not nonsense just because the idea is conceptually flawed (though it still is) but since there cannot possibly be a value reference point that would remain the same in any "coordinate system", so to apeak. In other words, whatever you may choose as a reference point (for taking or copying the value off it), it will be prone to value changes on its own (in respect to other valuable assets). You may take energy and you may even take time itself (which looks a better idea) as a basis for reference, but you will still face and have to deal with the change in the values of these references themselves. This is what any hard currency backed up by some asset is set to face inevitably. In this way, just limiting the number of coins to 21M is a step ahead since it allows to get rid of such issues altogether