My question is, who in their right mind hire someone that is even remotely connected to an extortion scheme when they are trying to raise money via an ICO (or otherwise) from investors? These types of investments are already super high risk for investors, and competition for money is fierce, and I cannot imagine a potential investor having any interest in a company doing business with someone who is a tenth as shady as lauda/aTriz/ALU.
I suspect that's why aTriz was the one who announced the topic and has been handling a majority of the ICOs from what I can tell. His reputation hadn't yet been trashed, although vouching for a gambling script that claimed to defraud online casinos, hiring a user to advertise for you that attempted to use someone else's identity before refusing to pay them (demanding payback), and pushing a scam ICO while having advanced knowledge of the lies being told should resolve that issue unless people are scared to go against Lauda's crew for fear of retaliation, which is a whole other issue involving some members in DT1 using very poor judgement.
So if a member of ALU promotes an ICO and it turns out to be a 100% scam where they had advanced knowledge, you as a member of ALU have no accountability, will not negatively rate the member who helped pull the scam, and will simply wash your hands with the scam and move on to the next money maker? Is that correct?
I have not stated nor implied such a thing.Answer the question dude. It is exactly what I've observed from your actions.
Yes, the former is true. Just don't go back to your old habits, I don't need people visiting the hospital. 
I'm trying to follow along with my popcorn in hand. What did you mean by this, Lauda?Your guess is as good as mine what the "secret meaning" is. I took it as a threat to disguise an act of desperation.
