Topic: hilariousandco, Mitchell,Vod,Ognasty Bitblisscoin.com could be a scamsite - page 12. (Read 8417 times)

Dissection of a post, seeing it for the first time! Anyways, I am not feeling bad for Atriz, I am just poking a wounded guy. The thing for which I am actually sad is that how some people choose to abuse the trust which the community invested in them. Choosing a project which is later revealed to be a scam project is another thing and dragging on with a project which is clearly cheating is totally different thing. And then, I think choosing a project which follows Bitconnect's footsteps is not a great thing either. On top of that keeping ALU in dark and giving it a bad name too.
 
The good thing is Lauda herself tagged her and maintained her consistency. Leaving a negative feedback for your business partner is the last thing you want to do as a business partner. But Lauda did it and I guess she should be applauded for that. Hopefully we will get to see the same consistency from other DT members too, who have chosen to stay neutral.

You mean before this incident or incidents?

If you need them let us know we will paste those links here. Its not a Lauda's forums and lauda need to behave like a normal member.
Let me know if you further needed proof.

[AD] Has someone tagged his alt account yet?

I disagree with no malice. Mainly because of the events leading up to this and the fact that aTriz calls out others for similar shady behaviors.

Let me first say this situation is/was a tough one for me, probably the toughest I've faced on this forum. I had enough confidence in ALU to join the signature campaign several months ago (which I ended shortly after the alia debacle - personally, I just was not comfortable with aTriz's involvement there). This was the first paid signature I've ever wore (not including the NastyFans you get nothing signature, which interestingly enough, I later found out only got me put on public ignore lists, till this very day! ). I realize others may not see their signature as them 'supporting' something but I'm not someone that would wear a signature of a project I don't support.

When I contacted aTriz about the signature campaign he was posting about, I specifically told aTriz that I did not want to be part of anything shady and only wanted to be involved in advertising for a project that was legitimate. He assured me it was legitimate and pointed out what it was - ALU. I researched ALU a bit and, believe it or not, had some comfort seeing Lauda as part of it, and honestly liked the idea of it, thinking it might be a way to make ICOs less of a cesspool and a little more honest. I believed this because aTriz & Lauda were part of it (whom had both expressed disgust towards other ICOs doing bumping and other shady activities and have called out quite a few people and ICOs), so I don't think my belief was that far fetched, as I would have expected either one of these two people to have called "SCAM" as soon as someone was saying they raised 3 million dollars and they had really only raised ~10,000.

Some examples for aTriz calling out scammers for shady behavior:
https://archive.is/VLSzo (this specifically related to an ICO falsifying invested funds - aTriz is well aware this is scam behavior.)
https://archive.is/JhHUa (calling out bumping)
http://archive.is/sFeNG#selection-24257.0-24257.362 (calling out exchanges for manipulating numbers)
Lauda needs no examples because Lauda constantly tags people for shady behavior like this.

When I see aTriz making comments like this about other ICOs but then ignoring his own clients misbehavior as a "marketing strategy", I feel like there is malice here, and why I responded the way I did on this thread.

The whole situation aggravates me and is just frustrating.

[1] Yeah, big time.

[2] He can follow like Jamal did, go on OR be like the thousands of others who lost their ways too.

[3] Apparently, he has an army defending him too.

[4] At least, 4 DT members and many others see.

[5] Very True; we can only blame the BMs for their actions.




[1] https://inequality.org/facts/global-inequality/ I do believe that even 1 BTC (as life savings) is quite high for most of the people in the world.

[2] Neither me.




Or buy another one or use his alt account.




P.S.

I'm happy to see that many purported shit-posters are finally talking in argumentative paras and contributing to an ethical debate; this is a welcome change, if only due to such threads. 

Not everyone is like you.

Are you talking to me, Sir? This is a forum and I can talk about whatever the fuck I want. So kindly get your saying with you and bugger off, mkay?

Are you making a living too? 

There's this saying that if you don't know what the fuck you are talking about you should probably shut it.

aTriz was making a living off the forum?  Holy shit I am mind-blown! Is he from a 3rd world country too? Well he could quit college and make another account then. Easy peasy lemon squeezy 

aTriz fucked up, and by the looks of things he is losing his way of making a living and having an army of people against him. He made a mistake which we can all see was a bad one, but I cant see any malice in any of his actions. As for the ICO's you cannot blame the managers, the forum or anyone other than the Owners of the ICO's and the greedy investors who have made this space a cesspool.

Believe it or not, I am just a concerned forum member. As to my shitpostery, feel free to make of it what you like.

May I ask about your interest in this thread, ALU and Atriz? Looking through your posts you seem like any other useless shitposter up until the 2nd of April, out of the blue you get extremely interested in this particular case and you start spreading all sorts of information around you. Personal vendetta?

Well, luckily for me, Its not your forum/thread and its not my job to make you happy.

Feel free to point me in the direction of me being a gun for hire, if you can. I've only worked with projects I'm closely assoicated with and I've never managed any campaign that is related to an ICO. So please, if you are trying to insult me at least do it right.

As for why this thread bothers me there's a few reasons, you being the obvious one.

I can read just fine, thank you. Why does the thread bother you so much? oh I see, you are another arse hole manager, gun for hire?

Care to elaborate on who or what is my "chum in crime"?

Perhaps you should learn how to read, or better yet perhaps you should stop with your stupid fucking comments and let this thread go, how about that?

Can you read? or are you only interested in defending your chum in crime?

Life savings = 1 BTC? I mean c'mon...

For the record, I don't think that it is up to any campaign manager to decide whether or not an ICO is a good or a bad investment. Granted, you can check it out to see it's not a complete scam but when it comes to investing in ICO's each investor should do their own research. It's not like I feel sad for anyone who lost money on bitconnect.

aTriz got his just deserts. Nobody compelled Lauda to tag aTriz. Lauda did what she does best, as she is concerned only with her own personal profit. aTriz was made the patsy in this sorry affair, however, the forum needs to do more in clamping down hard whenever it can on these dirty ico's.

My concern is for folks that inadvertently lose their life savings to these shitty icos promoted by the likes of ALU. These so called shady marketing practices helped Bitblisscoin.com steal @ least 1BTC - according to aTriz. That's money people have lost, where is the sympathy for them?

[1] Who has denied him anything, he can still go ahead and do what he wants? He should obviously follow the guidelines you laid down.

[2] I think this is again a very blanket statement and how is anyone knocked out, he can continue, just like Jamal does.