Topic: hilariousandco, Mitchell,Vod,Ognasty Bitblisscoin.com could be a scamsite - page 7. (Read 8432 times)

The forum is searchable just fine. Use google.

Your question has been answered a week ago if you had bothered to look at aTriz' feedback - I posted a neg for him, so yes, I think he's a scammer.

Unless you use Quicksy's definition of a scam, in which case aTriz is not a scammer. Take your pick.

Yes the on poster said its about ALU services,
I said there are some more posts but the forum is not searchable.  P.S you didnt answer my question so I wont answer again to you.

You are right , Hilarious weared his avatar and added the positive trust to his account .
 

So "a lot people" is one newbie?

Oh boi, the staggering amount of irony


Just one thing to say "this thread is about Bitblisscoin, please post with ontopic."

I know the same gang appears everywhere, and btw this thread is about Bitblisscoin, please post with ontopic.
Your Lauda is nothing here except marking red trust that is used for trusting people, also your Lauda adds SMAS list for posting.

Where you gone all these days? you appears a day or two and then disappears for a long time.

Oooh hey there Endla Suresh, are you still not done being salty over Lauda marking you what you are? A shitposter?

Anyway for real guys ignore this dude lmao, he's the one that unironically believed for weeks that's some dude clearly mentioned to be from EU/US to be an indian and wanted people to report him to the Indian tax body cause #FuckLogic

I am asking again to you and suchmoon, whether aTriz is a scammer or not? also how many scam projects belongs to aTriz?
Did you seen those ICO's started by someone and handed over them to aTriz?

They exchanged merits for shit posts that started by Deena, is that proof not enough for everyone? You all the time supports to them and disagree with us.
So whats your problem?  This thread started long back, https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/shady-business-dealings-of-atriz-3067759
so you all are sleeping at that time? Does Lauda is not seen that thread?

Isn't it funny how projects that were managed by aTriz are now being divided into ALU and ATriz projects. What is the use of a co-operative if not to benefit all of its member, or at the very least some?

a) Not yet proven to be scam project = ALU
b) Proven Scams = aTriz



Don't count on it, but expect a heartfelt apology.

As to whether aTriz is Lauda, I very much doubt it, but it wouldn't surprise me. There are a couple of other accounts that I suspect are most likely hers but I cannot say for sure.

I vaguely remember it, if I'm not wrong (someone correct me if I am), it was something about Atriz paying hilarious for the signature campaign and that's all(not pointing fingers, just adding some info)

I realise that of course - I am just pointing out that this very obvious fact has apparently gone over endlasuresh's head.

That is a satire thread. It seems very much like a joke.

endlasuresh might as well be quoting my thread for evidence: https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/new-irrefutable-evidence-that-atriz-lauda1111oneone-2612664

So your entire proof lies in the fact that they both used a very common mIRC expression? Well, that seems rock-solid and water-tight to me! (/s)

Poe's law in action here. I honestly can't tell if you are being serious or pulling our collective legs. Given your previous complete lack of insight, I suspect it is the former, which is embarrassing for you but even funnier for everyone else.

https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/atriz-lauda-the-biggest-scam-in-the-world-more-scam-than-quickseller-2575887
Here is one thread, but there are some more posts Ive read in the past, The forum is not good for searching so I cannot offer further more.

Now its your turn whether aTriz is a scammer or not? I am waiting for your reply.

It cannot be denied that lauda was aggressive in giving negative trust against sold accounts and would go as far as to refuse to discuss negative ratings when they were disputed. I don’t think there is an argument to counter this point.

I checked and lauda was giving out negative ratings for this reason for about a year before aTriz became active after being sold, so the argument that account sales weren’t untrustworthy at the time of sale doesn’t hold water.

When you go into business with someone, it is expected that you will preform due diligence before formality agreeing to go into business with the person. There was a multi year gap in posts by aTriz, so it is difficult to argue that lauda was unaware of the fact the account was sold.

There are two very distinct groups of addresses (wallets) that was used before the account was sold and after the account was sold. The wallet from before the account was sold remained active as of recently but acted very differently. The exchanges that were used by the original owner is very different from the exchanges current aTriz uses. Yes, aTriz provided a signed message however it lacked a date and fails to prove original ownership of the account.

Lauda posted upthread that aTriz making the ANN thread doesn’t mean he managed the bounty campaign, and aTriz made almost all of the ANN threads for ALU. ATriz also opened a scam accusation against the dev of one ICO when they failed/refused to provide a verifiable Dox. However ALU was managing multiple ICOs bounty campaigns whose underlying ICO was allmost certainly a scam. No one has provided any information whatsoever about who manages which campaigns.

If you refuse to accept that lauda is aTriz, it would not be unreasonable to conclude that lauda was aware of the various frauds ALU was included in, if not actively participated in.

Are you now in pre-law at cal state or something?

Was Bitblisscoin.com under ALU as opposed to purely aTriz?

I am not quite clear on this one. And I would like to know which campaigns of aTriz's (which were scummy/scams) were in fact under ALU rule.

If the parties were not involved in the campaigns then they shouldn't be held responsible.

No. This is basic agency law. The employer should have prevented said action.

Answer the question - who are the people claiming that aTriz is Lauda? Please provide quotes.


Nah, just giving him some rope.

Their is difference between an employee and management team,
An employee gets daily wage either the business is made gains or not, but a management person get percentage in that project.  Three of them having different positions, so there should be some sort of money being adjusted.

You read one reply but you don't read the other. The other reply states that by "some time" I mean a long period, or forever. When you read the sentence, do you think to yourself that "some time" = short duration?