Topic: Hillary Clinton to Announce 2016 Run for President on Sunday - page 4. (Read 4616 times)

Okay little scumbags, lowlives, no souls working for Hillary Clinton : d.e. or f.e. or u.e.

I think that the only reason that some people support your cause is to get this shot updated in 4k 3d...

you have to agree it's a little bit old, and it would give a lot of time to reverse b.o. policy with eyes ball glued to the screens :


http://jackiekilledjfk.webs.com/bullet%20trajectory.gif

by the way, bitches, you don't have the right to chose the vp... now you know why

enjoy, ahh and btw in the past it was hard to calculate one stone 2 birds... now with hashing power available... it's just a question of timing (so the official vp may know when ridding the waves of "success") high frequency powa.

the media biz is quite harsh once you became a clear, certain and sure :

I do too... but who knows .


http://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2014/06/16/article-2658801-1ECE45B000000578-237_634x688.jpg

is the lady in the back working for cnn

working for the enemy of the federation of Russia is always perilous... even if you don't have the ability to perceive the risk involved, remember the lawyers don't get any immunity, you betrayed justice, for law. you became a legalist... but against the Empire who are you with your pen, papers, and little books full of leaflet in it?

I know the answer.

the joke is really on all those scumbags that will vote for her... why not make the most of it? it's called going with the trend, then once the votes are clear, purging... anyway you can't defeat the usarmy dear Clinton gang... you learn it... remember they are crazy... and skilled in what they do.

otherwise I am really curious to know how law addict people justify this action of letting a child rapist free? I will create a topic...

http://ts3.mm.bing.net/th?id=JN.aPcWqVyTZcmdMgyBMS0FHw&pid=15.1&H=106&W=160

your hero...   .

We already know that will do the same to her husband, we do not know is who occupied the role of Monica Samille Lewinsky 

The definition of a presstitute...


Hillary Clinton's sneakily brilliant launch


[...]
But from a marketing perspective, her launch may have been much more successful than critics think. The YouTube announcement video took on the central strategic challenge for the campaign and candidate: To flip Clinton's message from self-absorbed "I" to empathetic "we."

While critics may sneer, it is hard to deny that the image it projects of Hillary is more confident, fresher, simpler and forward-looking, with even a bit of the upstart feel of two of the most successful product launch companies, Nike and Apple. Clinton's team may have begun to create an empathetic relationship with voters that has eluded her in the past, most crucially when she lost the nomination fight to Barack Obama in 2008.

In marketing terms, rebranding is a strategy to bring a new name, term, symbol or design to an established brand with the aim of developing a new identity in the minds of consumers. Reframing is a strategy that goes further: it seeks to change how a consumer (or voter) emotionally experiences an established brand.

A rebrand may change how you think about a brand; a reframe may change how you feel about it. In the Apple case, the company at one time fell on its face when it unveiled the original Macintosh; some thought the company was headed for oblivion. But when Steve Jobs returned as CEO, he went back to the drawing board and soon unveiled the iPod, which not only changed the way consumers thought about Apple, but how they experienced it. Not only a rebrand -- but a reframe.

Take Hillary's road trip to Iowa in the van nicknamed Scooby. The press lampooned her, but I would bet that for many others, her unscripted and anonymous stop at Chipotle reinforced the "everyday Americans" campaign theme. Hillary stood in line to order, an everyday customer among everyday people at an everyday fast-food chain.





Also introduced last week was what will come to be the single most-ubiquitous element of her campaign: Clinton's new and controversial campaign logo. It is a brilliant, iconic expression of the emotional connection she wants people to have with her, her message and her movement. In fact, her logo is all about movement.

Simple, confident, high tech and shorthand to a much younger set of voters, the bold red arrow moving left to right in front of the strong blue H says it all: You are the important ones. I'm here to support you with everything I've got. Let me help you move forward.

Taken together, all the pieces of Clinton's announcement -- as well as the unconventional media she used to deliver them -- bring her back on stage not as a leader from yesterday but, surprisingly, as one for the future.

Coincidentally, the way Marco Rubio announced his run for the Republican nomination most likely amplified the impact of Clinton's reframing. For all his posturing about being the new generation, Rubio followed to a "T" the most traditional script for announcing a candidacy: traditional stage and podium, dark suit, bright tie, wife and kids on camera, a live speech, all about himself, timed for the evening news.

Rubio's logo, the signature of his image, drew immediate criticism for being amateurish and unconsidered, even leaving Alaska and Hawaii off the map of America. In stark contrast, Hillary showed the confidence and finesse to buck tradition on every front. It was Hillary who pulled the ultimate jiu-jitsu.


http://www.cnn.com/2015/04/17/opinions/pease-hillary-clinton-launch/index.html

If Clinton 2.0 is anything like Clinton 1.0 then surveillance will expand and crypto wars will be back. Lot's of countries now (Australia, UK, France) have just put down new laws to intercept TLS and whatever they can to prevent private communications from happening.

It's really flabbergasting to me that anyone could actually be excited about Hillary. I guess you might see her as the lesser of two evils, but how could anyone really think that she's especially good? I've seen several people with "I'm ready for Hillary!" stickers on their cars, and I know some people who really like her. It boggles the mind.

You'd think that having to choose between another Bush or another Clinton (this is a likely scenario) would cause the American people to try voting for at third party or something. But it wouldn't. Democracy just doesn't work. The best possible outcome is that Rand Paul gets elected, but even he isn't perfect, and he is pretty unlikely to become president.

It'd be pretty hilarious of Walker got the Republican nomination. He has basically zero personality and not much of a platform. There's not much about him a Republican can complain about because he doesn't do/say much, but he'd be crushed by Hillary, and who knows what he would do if he somehow managed to win the presidency.

Yeah, I hate the two party system.  It's all about the Benjamins at this point as well.

Paul or someone like him that might try to get thing back on a track more in keeping with the constitution would be great.

I do not think he has a shot, and see little difference between the other parties.  The winner is nothing but a puppet dancing on strings anyhow.

America is a dead man walking, IMHO.  Totally corrupt system and no solution in sight, as those that have the power to Change the system are the ones benefitting.

Iowa: Walker is leading by a huge margin (25% vs 13% to Paul). There is not much time, and Rand may not win this state.
NH: As per the latest polls, Walker is again leading this state with Cruz in the 2nd position (24% vs 14%).
SC: The main fight seems to be between Walker and Bush.

Looking at the opinion polls, I am pessimistic about his chances.

Hillary ditches Scooby van and flies to New Jersey after wrapping up three-day Iowa campaign tour - toting her own luggage! She probably hasn't done that in 20 yrs or more, everything is staged with this bitch it's unbelievable.

-United flight 3954 carried Clinton from Omaha, Nebraska to Newark, New Jersey on Thursday
-Met by a Town Car and a police escort – on the tarmac – for what's likely a short trip back to her Chappaqua, New York estate
-Follows Iowa campaign swing full of controlled interactions, staged conversations and little interaction with real people
-Clinton was, however, photographed pulling her own suitcase down an airport concourse


Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3042625/Hillary-ditches-Scooby-flies-New-Jersey-wrapping-three-day-Iowa-campaign-tour-totes-luggage.html#ixzz3XcC1b71o

I'm not saying it'll be a walk in the park but if he can manage to take Iowa and NH (the first two) then he'll be riding momentum into SC. Also, you'll see a few or more dropping out after the first two contests and then the supporters will divvy up and go their own way. However, the establishment is definitely funding many of the other candidates so if their Ace - Bush doesn't pan out, they have Walker and Rubio still their back pocket. Many conservatives are being played for fools by buying this inflated candidacy of Walker and the establishment is loving that as it's less supporters/votes for Rand. But, it's still early and there's lots of campaigning to go. If you checked out my thread on Rand, you'd see he has the highest amount of people seriously considering or might consider voting for him of all other GOP candidates per my link from Bloomberg recently.

It will be extremely tough for Rand to secure the GOP nomination, as all the other (establishment) candidates will come together to prevent him from winning it. Even if he is leading with 30% support, the remaining 70% will unite against him.

hahaha....nice one.
But why are you against it my dear friend. Did she do something harm to you?

The show is just starting BC but I can't imagine why you've already bailed on Rand's chances and then in the next sentence mention that those bozos don't have a chance as if they're worthy of it. Granted, bush, christie and rubio suck hard and I'm willing to put walker on that list atm, let's not do the backpacking for the establishment and their candidate pickings which is the aforementioned minus Rand - included in. BC, you must be in the US to bust out them thoughts.

Honestly, I believe that she will win in 2016. There is no credible opposition from the GOP. Rand Paul would have defeated her, but he may not be able to get the GOP nomination. Others, such as Jeb Bush and Christie are good for nothing.

Hillary: 'How Our Kids are Educated' is a 'NON-FAMILY Enterprise'

Educating “the next generation” is “the most important non-family enterprise” we have, said presidential candidate Hillary Clinton to a six-person round-table at her first campaign stop in Iowa.

Hillary’s statement came in response to a question from one of the members of the panel, Diane, a high school English teacher. In a long and winding question, Diane said: “I think we’re very blessed to live where we do… we have all these opportunities… and I worry that not all of America gets to experience this treasure that we have, and I think the Common Core curriculum is a wonderful step in the right direction of improving American education and it’s painful to see that attacked.”

“I’m just wondering what you can do to bring that heart back to education in the United States?” asked Diane. “What can we do so that parents, communities, and businesses believe in education and that teachers… are respected…?”

“Wow, that is really a powerful, touching comment that I absolutely embrace,” said Hillary.

“When I think about the really unfortunate argument that’s been going on around Common Core, it’s really …painful,” she said, using Diane’s exact word.

Without addressing the deeply unpopular curriculum’s critics, Clinton spoke of Common Core’s apolitical beginnings, before saying:

“Your question is really a larger one: how did we end up at a point where we are so negative about the most important non-family enterprise in the raising of the next generation, which is how our kids are educated.”

Hillary continued: “There are a lot of explanations for that I suppose, but whatever they are, we need to try to get back into a broad conversation where people will actually listen to each other again, and try to come up with solutions for problems, because the problems here in Monticello aren’t the same problems you’ll find in the inner city… that’s a given, we have to do things differently, but it should all be driven by the same commitment, to try to make sure we do educate every child.”

“That’s why I was a senator and voted for Leave No Child Behind because I thought every child should matter… every child should have the same opportunity,” said Hillary.

http://www.mrctv.org/blog/hillary-how-our-kids-are-educated-non-family-enterprise-4

She wants the state to have full control over education so they can keep dumbing kids down and never develop any critical thinking skills. It takes a village dontcha know.

She is in the game far too long to win.

Yep, the gimme, gimme, gimme crowd and the feminazis crowd will vote for her in droves.

Really the dems have done a great job of cobbling together all of the special interests groups and convincing them they actually give a shit about whatever their cause is.  A party of takers voting free shit for themselves and getting fucked by the same people they loathe anyhow, as both parties are on the take from the same people.  The whole thing is nothing but bread and circuses.

america is such a democratic country.. after the first ninja president, a woman! you guise are an example for the rest of the world.

PS: lets not spend the multi billions in campaign this time and get it done with already uh. not like we dont know the obvious winner.

Blacks will vote for her in the range of 98% to 99%. Mexicans will do the same, may be at 80% to 90%. Add in some stupid feminists from the Non-Hispanic White ethnic group and we will be having Pinocchibitch as the POTUS in 2016. 

Very well put!

Hilary and Bill C has been calculating and manipulating for almost 20 years to get to this day since Bill was POTUS: using Bill even though she knows of his philandering, becoming a NY senator moving to become "resident" as stepping stone, lost her bid to become POTUS and took the position of Secretary of State as another stepping stone despite Obama's derogatory views of her and Democrats jumping off ship onto an unknown inexperienced Obama to reach today. All those positions is not as a public servant working for the good of the country, it is calculating and scheming to get the position, not because it is to better the country.