I cant wait till people start fucking them up, RARRRGHHHHH CNTS!!!!!
Bro...
Have a read of my post above yours, and all the examples they put forward, this is from the ATO.
Does this mean that a normal NON-business Non GST registered person.. wanting to buy a Bitcoin from an exchange which are GST registered, need to actually pay GST on the bitcoin he purchases of the exchange?
You must read my post which was copied from the ATO to see what I mean.
PS -- -FoR those who don't know GST = 10%
Yes the way I read this if a "consumer" namely non GST registered person were to purchase XBT from an exchange in Australia they would be subject to GST.
This is the bait for the government. The trap in which the government falls is when the "consumer" sells XBT in Australia either for AUD or even better still in exchange for goods or services subject to GST. My point is that this consumer now has a very strong incentive to 1) Register for the GST or 2) purchase XBT outside of Australia or 3) both in order to avoid and / or evade the GST.
By the way I have been following this GST/VAT issue with XBT for well over two years. Here a post in early 2012 on the situation in Canada:
First the disclaimer: I am not a lawyer
The question here is whether Bitcoin is subject to the Good and Services Tax (GST) in Canada. The GST is the Canadian version of a value added tax. The relevant legislation is the
Excise Tax Act http://laws-lois.justice.gc.ca/eng/acts/E-15/page-94.html#h-71. It may come down to whether Bitocin is considered "money" which is defined in the act as follows:
“money”
« argent »
“money” includes any currency, cheque, promissory note, letter of credit, draft, traveller’s cheque, bill of exchange, postal note, money order, postal remittance and other similar instrument, whether Canadian or foreign, but does not include currency the fair market value of which exceeds its stated value as legal tender in the country of issuance or currency that is supplied or held for its numismatic value;
There is probably a good case here under "and other similar instrument" for the position that Bitcoin is "money" and therefore not subject to the GST, given that its purpose is its use a medium of exchange in trade.
and my comments in 2012 regarding VAT in Sweden (Another government that apparently has swallowed the bait)
I have tried to sort out what applies regarding Bitcoin and VAT in Sweden and since some of the rules regarding VAT are harmonized within EU I thought that I'd share this in order to get some feedback from other EU citizens. These are my conclusions (I'm not an expert in this field so feel free to point out any errors or terms that I use incorrectly):
* Finansinspektionen ("Financial Services Authority"?) in Sweden tell me that they do not consider Bitcoin a currency.
* The Swedish Tax Agency tell me that I should treat Bitcoin as an "electronic service".
Everything that is delivered electronically is considered a "service" instead of a "commodity", there are a few differences in taxation but I don't think that's what's important here. What's important is that since Bitcoin is not considered a currency a purchase with bitcoins will be considered barter. In barter, one should look each transaction separately so that if e.g. a customer (private individual) buys a table from a company and pays with bitcoins these 2 transactions should be considered:
1. The customer bought a table from the company
2. The company bought some bitcoins from the customer
I the first transaction VAT is added by the company and recorded as output VAT. In the second transaction there is no VAT since the purchase is from a private individual. Later when the company wants to get rid of the bitcoins this will be considered a sale of bitcoins (regardless of whether they are exchanged for some currency or if something is bought using them) and then VAT should be added to the sale and recorded as output VAT.
From what I can understand this is a bit problematic. It will be hard for the company to exchange the bitcoins since they must add VAT (in Sweden this is 25%) to the "sale". No private individual will buy at that price since they can buy from eachother with no VAT. Some other company could possibly buy them since they can deduct the VAT but at some point some company will have to return the bitcoins to an individual.
Have other people in the EU reached similar conclusions? If my conclusions are correct it is a pretty big obstacle in getting merchants to start accepting Bitcoin.
For Swedish readers, I have started a similar topic in Swedish
at bitcoin.se.
There is a very critical flaw in this argument especially in the case of Sweden. The "private individual" is no longer a consumer but is in fact a business that is selling Bitcoin and has to register for VAT. Sweden has in fact one of the lowest minimum thresholds for VAT/GST registration in the OECD
http://www.oecd.org/dataoecd/12/12/34674438.xls at 30000 SEK or approx 840 BTC at current rates! In a Bitcoin only economy every transaction would have equally compensating input and output VAT credits and equal amounts of VAT charged by each party effectively negating the VAT.
The bottom line if that if the tax authorities choose to treat Bitcoin as a "digital service" they have essentially created a huge loophole for VAT avoidance simply by registering for VAT and then using Bitcoin for every transaction.
I made my case that trying to collect GST or VAT on XBT or other crypto-currencies will lead to rampant GST/VAT avoidance and / or evasion back in early 2012. Canada has not to this point fallen into this trap (I believe thanks to the broad definition of money see my quote above), the United Kingdom fell into the trap and escaped, Sweden is trying to push the whole of the EU into this trap
http://www.coindesk.com/europe-inches-towards-decision-bitcoin-vat/ and Australia has swallowed the bait. The point is that GST/VAT are by design
consumption taxes and trying to collect them on something that is not consumed simply does not work.