Author

Topic: HoboNickels - HBN - High Fast Stake - Version 2.0! More Secure, Less Intensive - page 140. (Read 478852 times)

member
Activity: 121
Merit: 10
HBN <3
Hmm, I've noticed a weird thing with my wallet.

I downloaded the blockchain over again after I was getting out of sync messages.

Now http://hbn.cryptocoinexplorer.com/rich is stating I have more BTC than my wallet shows.

The rich list says I have 86.5k but my wallets saying 82.8K
legendary
Activity: 1033
Merit: 1005
HBN qt wallet currently pushes close to 1GB on the memory.  Shocked

legendary
Activity: 1148
Merit: 1000
Have to say, loving this coin....

I started buying this coin back in early June just to stake it, and it's been the best ROI ever.

The fact that it's so hard to buy-in to this coin is a good indicator that the coin is undervalued. Nobody is selling, or has been selling for a while now... But there are plenty of buy orders there to catch it when someone does sell.

I sold few today, needed the cash, felt bad though.

I was mining it since 2013 at that time i was averaging 1500 coins a day. Good days now I am staking it only, I no longer have mining rigs.
legendary
Activity: 2114
Merit: 1090
=== NODE IS OK! ==
Yeah, these buy walls are real.
newbie
Activity: 36
Merit: 0
Have to say, loving this coin....

I started buying this coin back in early June just to stake it, and it's been the best ROI ever.

The fact that it's so hard to buy-in to this coin is a good indicator that the coin is undervalued. Nobody is selling, or has been selling for a while now... But there are plenty of buy orders there to catch it when someone does sell.
legendary
Activity: 2114
Merit: 1090
=== NODE IS OK! ==
Please help me, balance in my wallet ≠ in blockexplorer. I tried
chek&repair, -salvagewallet, delete blockchain and download again, restored old wallet from 1,5 ears old backup, export -> new wallet -> import, but balance in my wallet ≠ in blockexplorer...  What's wrong?

What is the number of the block in your client?
Which explorer are you using?
What is the balance difference?

1. 2441813
2. http://hbn.cryptocoinexplorer.com/rich
3. in wallet less ~6000 hbn


Strange, I tend to get more on the explorer too, but it tends to fix over time. Sorry for not being able to help you more, but I would certainly trust the wallet.
member
Activity: 82
Merit: 10
Please help me, balance in my wallet ≠ in blockexplorer. I tried
chek&repair, -salvagewallet, delete blockchain and download again, restored old wallet from 1,5 ears old backup, export -> new wallet -> import, but balance in my wallet ≠ in blockexplorer...  What's wrong?

What is the number of the block in your client?
Which explorer are you using?
What is the balance difference?

1. 2441813
2. http://hbn.cryptocoinexplorer.com/rich
3. in wallet less ~6000 hbn
full member
Activity: 216
Merit: 100
Please help me, balance in my wallet ≠ in blockexplorer. I tried
chek&repair, -salvagewallet, delete blockchain and download again, restored old wallet from 1,5 ears old backup, export -> new wallet -> import, but balance in my wallet ≠ in blockexplorer...  What's wrong?

If you use CryptoCoinExplorer as a blockexplorer don't worry. The blockexplorer is not accurate, it always shows too much. So if that's the case, trust your wallet balance.

If you read this dreamwatcher, maybe you should talk to presstab. His Cap explorer is way more accurate than CCE where it concerns balances of addresses.

http://www.presstab.pw/phpexplorer/CAP/index.php
legendary
Activity: 2114
Merit: 1090
=== NODE IS OK! ==
Please help me, balance in my wallet ≠ in blockexplorer. I tried
chek&repair, -salvagewallet, delete blockchain and download again, restored old wallet from 1,5 ears old backup, export -> new wallet -> import, but balance in my wallet ≠ in blockexplorer...  What's wrong?

What is the number of the block in your client?
Which explorer are you using?
What is the balance difference?
member
Activity: 82
Merit: 10
Please help me, balance in my wallet ≠ in blockexplorer. I tried
chek&repair, -salvagewallet, delete blockchain and download again, restored old wallet from 1,5 ears old backup, export -> new wallet -> import, but balance in my wallet ≠ in blockexplorer...  What's wrong?
legendary
Activity: 2114
Merit: 1090
=== NODE IS OK! ==
Damn, too late! There was a time this year I thought I was the very last person buying HBN, now everyone wants it. But as I stated earlier, the buy walls push the price up so strong that there are a very few buying opportunities. Next stop 0.00027?
legendary
Activity: 1148
Merit: 1000
Just placed a buy order for 30,400 HBN for 1.4BTC on Cryptsy if anyone wants to fill it with orders big and small. Will take all you can sell. Its at a nice price of 4600+ sat.

https://www.cryptsy.com/markets/view/HBN_BTC

Vegas

 I can fill you in 3 days.
legendary
Activity: 1610
Merit: 1003
"Yobit pump alert software" Link in my signature!
Just placed a buy order for 30,400 HBN for 1.4BTC on Cryptsy if anyone wants to fill it with orders big and small. Will take all you can sell. Its at a nice price of 4600+ sat.

https://www.cryptsy.com/markets/view/HBN_BTC

Vegas
legendary
Activity: 2534
Merit: 1129
Makes sense. Still like having the ability to move all staked by default to an address or two. It could be mentioned on that screen that it's possible.

Yes, it feels like an arbitrary limit, but I welcome it - it gives me an ability to hedge against loss and for it to be effective, I dont need a higher count than 50%. I've heard CLAMs have their own implementation of staking to a different address, I wonder what are the limits there.

I have considered moving this 50% up, but so far I like the 50%. The reason I initially choose it, was if there was a roll back, the S4C would send again, thereby causing 100% of the stake to be sent. If the max value was 100% it would chew away at the principal which would defeat the purpose.

The double send error has been fixed, so moving this up 100% could be safer.

The other reason I choose 50% was that I wanted the users base to always increase, so both a charity and the user would benefit.

OK, thanks : Well considered choice !
legendary
Activity: 2114
Merit: 1090
=== NODE IS OK! ==
Sir Tranz...

Can I convince you to support a Raspbian Wallet for BottleCaps and HoboNickels.. Smiley



Hi, I do support for that currently  Wink
https://cryptocointalk.com/topic/38783-hobonickels-for-arm-linux/

Yea! Pretty easy to compile on the Pi. I had a bit of trouble en the past making a fully compatible static executable for UNIX. But DIY isn't too bad at all. As the main road blocks have been cleared or instructed around.

Right. I tested multiple wallets on ARM Linux and Hobonickels is the only one which I got working fully (both daemon and GUI). I did not have so much luck with VPNCoin and Opal
legendary
Activity: 1540
Merit: 1060
May the force bit with you.
Sir Tranz...

Can I convince you to support a Raspbian Wallet for BottleCaps and HoboNickels.. Smiley



Hi, I do support for that currently  Wink
https://cryptocointalk.com/topic/38783-hobonickels-for-arm-linux/

Yea! Pretty easy to compile on the Pi. I had a bit of trouble en the past making a fully compatible static executable for UNIX. But DIY isn't too bad at all. As the main road blocks have been cleared or instructed around.
legendary
Activity: 1540
Merit: 1060
May the force bit with you.
Makes sense. Still like having the ability to move all staked by default to an address or two. It could be mentioned on that screen that it's possible.

Yes, it feels like an arbitrary limit, but I welcome it - it gives me an ability to hedge against loss and for it to be effective, I dont need a higher count than 50%. I've heard CLAMs have their own implementation of staking to a different address, I wonder what are the limits there.

I have considered moving this 50% up, but so far I like the 50%. The reason I initially choose it, was if there was a roll back, the S4C would send again, thereby causing 100% of the stake to be sent. If the max value was 100% it would chew away at the principal which would defeat the purpose.

The double send error has been fixed, so moving this up 100% could be safer.

The other reason I choose 50% was that I wanted the users base to always increase, so both a charity and the user would benefit.
legendary
Activity: 2114
Merit: 1090
=== NODE IS OK! ==
Sir Tranz...

Can I convince you to support a Raspbian Wallet for BottleCaps and HoboNickels.. Smiley



Hi, I do support for that currently  Wink
https://cryptocointalk.com/topic/38783-hobonickels-for-arm-linux/
legendary
Activity: 1078
Merit: 1011
Sir Tranz...

Can I convince you to support a Raspbian Wallet for BottleCaps and HoboNickels.. Smiley

legendary
Activity: 2114
Merit: 1090
=== NODE IS OK! ==
Makes sense. Still like having the ability to move all staked by default to an address or two. It could be mentioned on that screen that it's possible.

Yes, it feels like an arbitrary limit, but I welcome it - it gives me an ability to hedge against loss and for it to be effective, I dont need a higher count than 50%. I've heard CLAMs have their own implementation of staking to a different address, I wonder what are the limits there.
Jump to: