Topic: HoboNickels - HBN - High Fast Stake - Version 2.0! More Secure, Less Intensive - page 141. (Read 478852 times)
July 21, 2015, 11:51:49 AM
Makes sense. Still like having the ability to move all staked by default to an address or two. It could be mentioned on that screen that it's possible.
July 21, 2015, 04:39:37 AM
Intended or not you can give ~100% stake for charity. I have 2 computers running a wallet with 50% stake for charity to same address. Sends close to 100% of stakes. I am sure if you had a 3rd or 4th setup you would 3x/4x stake for charity.
And I am completely sure that would not work, because it would only attempt to doublespend. 100% charity staking is possible, because it only moves the coins you stake to your main wallet. It cannot move any coins which have not been generated.
July 20, 2015, 08:40:41 PM
Intended or not you can give ~100% stake for charity. I have 2 computers running a wallet with 50% stake for charity to same address. Sends close to 100% of stakes. I am sure if you had a 3rd or 4th setup you would 3x/4x stake for charity.
July 20, 2015, 06:34:40 AM
July 17, 2015, 02:17:10 AM
I have no idea what is going on, but this is awesoooome
July 12, 2015, 07:34:31 PM
so there is no way to send many of the same transactions to one address quickly? Would it work if I repeated the same address over and over, or must they be different?
Vegas
Vegas
Ok, generate the number of addresses you want, or use the same one over and over again. Not splitblock, and you don't need coincontrol.
sendmany address:amt, address:amt, etc...
EDIT: Almost all satoshi derived coins have this feature.
Hobonickels is a Script coin. Isn't that different from being satoshi derived?
I assume you meant scrypt, and no, it isn't. All are derived from bitcoin code, and share most if not all of the same RPC commands as bitcoin. The mining algorithm and proof of stake components are different, of course, but the base code is still bitcoin. NXT, for instance, is programmed from the ground up. While conceptually similar to bitcoin, it's code is completely original. (and a pain in the ass, in my arrogant opinion).
July 12, 2015, 07:18:24 PM
HBN is one of the most stable and advanced Proof of Stake coins. That is because it has not been in the spotlight for speculation, and Tranz has been able to patiently concentrate on excellent development.
July 12, 2015, 12:26:19 PM
Prepare for takeoff
I LOVE that curve!!! I can already see the rocket fuel trail behind it
Disclaimer: I am biased as hell. Hobonickels and Bottlecaps are my 2 favorite coins!!
Vegas
I agree. Hobonickels is one of the best POS coins and is well undervalued, almost ridiculously so, given all it has going for it. Any daily mining profits I generate go 100% into buying HBN right now. It is one of the few quality coins that has not seen much of a price increase lately...for some reason it has been under the radar...I do not expect that situation to last much longer.
July 12, 2015, 12:02:48 PM
Prepare for takeoff
I LOVE that curve!!! I can already see the rocket fuel trail behind it
Disclaimer: I am biased as hell. Hobonickels and Bottlecaps are my 2 favorite coins!!
Vegas
July 12, 2015, 11:57:32 AM
What blocksize is the best in terms of getting fast and stake? I had a lot of small blocks <30 which didnt stake after 17+ days - also has eaten 30% of my i5 cpu . So I cleaned my wallet up and made 10 x 5k blocks. These stake pretty much within 12h of being 10 days old. I just took a look in the wiki and I'm not sure what the slows the rate coins are generated means? What blocksize you guys prefer and why(explain as I'm 5 years old 
)? I'm kinda not looking through here.
)? I'm kinda not looking through here.Quote
Benefits of larger blocks:
Larger reward on PoS generation
Lowers the CPU use to run stake (multiple small blocks are more difficult to process)
Faster generation of stake (wastes less power running computers)
Benefits of smaller blocks:
Enhances network security (more hash rate devoted to PoS)
Easier for the network to process
Slows the rate new coins are generated
Larger reward on PoS generation
Lowers the CPU use to run stake (multiple small blocks are more difficult to process)
Faster generation of stake (wastes less power running computers)
Benefits of smaller blocks:
Enhances network security (more hash rate devoted to PoS)
Easier for the network to process
Slows the rate new coins are generated
You seem to have figured it out pretty well yourself. I tend to try and keep my blocks between 3-7k. This works well for quickish staking while not hitting the max stake reward cap.
Regarding your other question, many small blocks on the network increases competition for stake raising difficulty thats means it tends to both take longer to get a stake and the reward % is lower hence slows the rAte of new coin generation.
July 12, 2015, 07:35:56 AM
What blocksize is the best in terms of getting fast and stake? I had a lot of small blocks <30 which didnt stake after 17+ days - also has eaten 30% of my i5 cpu . So I cleaned my wallet up and made 10 x 5k blocks. These stake pretty much within 12h of being 10 days old. I just took a look in the wiki and I'm not sure what the slows the rate coins are generated means? What blocksize you guys prefer and why(explain as I'm 5 years old )? I'm kinda not looking through here.
)? I'm kinda not looking through here.Quote
Benefits of larger blocks:
Larger reward on PoS generation
Lowers the CPU use to run stake (multiple small blocks are more difficult to process)
Faster generation of stake (wastes less power running computers)
Benefits of smaller blocks:
Enhances network security (more hash rate devoted to PoS)
Easier for the network to process
Slows the rate new coins are generated
Larger reward on PoS generation
Lowers the CPU use to run stake (multiple small blocks are more difficult to process)
Faster generation of stake (wastes less power running computers)
Benefits of smaller blocks:
Enhances network security (more hash rate devoted to PoS)
Easier for the network to process
Slows the rate new coins are generated
July 11, 2015, 03:01:12 PM
Prepare for takeoff
July 11, 2015, 02:51:59 PM
damn Tranz - where do i get latest chain? i wasnt openin wallet for a bit and it.. hurts 100 days to go.
100 days to go.https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.3251165
thanx but overnight i got it downloaded. stacking all day now
July 10, 2015, 02:20:37 PM
damn Tranz - where do i get latest chain? i wasnt openin wallet for a bit and it.. hurts 100 days to go.
100 days to go. 
July 10, 2015, 12:48:02 AM
the term "pow/pos" has been destroyed by a year of instamine POW straight to stake.
What term does Hobo prefer?
"pow/pos hybrid" ?
What term does Hobo prefer?
"pow/pos hybrid" ?
July 09, 2015, 11:04:55 PM
so there is no way to send many of the same transactions to one address quickly? Would it work if I repeated the same address over and over, or must they be different?
Vegas
Vegas
Ok, generate the number of addresses you want, or use the same one over and over again. Not splitblock, and you don't need coincontrol.
sendmany address:amt, address:amt, etc...
EDIT: Almost all satoshi derived coins have this feature.
Hobonickels is a Script coin. Isn't that different from being satoshi derived?
July 09, 2015, 04:49:11 AM
Looks like we are at around 5000 sat currently 
nice to see a rise together with LTC and BTC
nice to see a rise together with LTC and BTC July 08, 2015, 06:32:55 AM
I wanted to buy a lot more, but the buy wall is so stiff that I would have to climb up real high to really get anything, which I don't feel like doing right now
July 03, 2015, 09:58:20 PM
so there is no way to send many of the same transactions to one address quickly? Would it work if I repeated the same address over and over, or must they be different?
Vegas
Vegas
Ok, generate the number of addresses you want, or use the same one over and over again. Not splitblock, and you don't need coincontrol.
sendmany address:amt, address:amt, etc...
EDIT: Almost all satoshi derived coins have this feature.
Thank you bio. Im getting conflicting information on this. Ive read on many boards that the "sendmany" command will NOT allow the same address. What I need is to send many transactions to the same address in small amounts , say blocks of 100. Can sendmany command do this? and if so, can you write a small "real world" example? (syntax)
July 03, 2015, 06:39:20 PM
so there is no way to send many of the same transactions to one address quickly? Would it work if I repeated the same address over and over, or must they be different?
Vegas
Vegas
Ok, generate the number of addresses you want, or use the same one over and over again. Not splitblock, and you don't need coincontrol.
sendmany address:amt, address:amt, etc...
EDIT: Almost all satoshi derived coins have this feature.
Jump to: