This is what Vod said to another of PICISI's sponsors:
Turns out Armis is running a scam, and not the charity (no charity license!) he claims. But he wants to reassure you that all the public identities of his board of directors (no corporation license!) will be disclosed to the stakeholders (no corporation license!) once he collects a large sum of non-reversible currency.
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.11371652Do all his sponsors know he is running a scam? Esp Hobonickels - I know thy are pro-charity and anti-greed.The sponsor responded to Vod "... He [Armis] has my trust anyway"
I know it's not your responsibility to speak up for PICISI, especially if you don't want to. Rest assured you are absolutely free to request removal your endorsement at anytime for any reason, or no reason at all; any donation provided will be 100% refunded if that is your desire. I also understand that Vod should not have defiled your thread with his lies but he did and I feel obligated to address it where it stands.
Vod issued negative feedback to me based on his ignorance of PICISI, then went about to tell everyone he could (including PICISI sponsors) more falsehoods about PICISI. It's obvious that Vod didn't read much about PICISI before rushing to judgement. Please allow me to address his reckless accusations in a responsible way:
Vod mentioned "Charity" "license" "corporation" "board of directors" "stakeholders" and "collection of large sums of ... currency"
I will prove that he jumped to the wrong conclusion then irresponsibly acted on his misunderstanding.
As you know PICISI is a business plan taking shape, and Armis is the designer and creator of PICISI. A critical part of that plan is formation of the org, creation of the site, and creation of currency.
Vod didn't read the plan, he refuses to read the articles about the plan, and doesn't even want to read the threads about the plan, yet he wants people to believe that he knows more about it than the person that created it. Had he done any of that homework he would see there was never any plan for PICISI to be a charity, that it was always the plan for PICISI to be a business specifically a crowdfunding business.
The site prerequisites imply that no site presently exists, the site prerequisites also imply that once those goals are met something will begin. When you look at the prerequisites as a whole it should be evident that those make up the basis for the business, and without them there is no business.
You don't need a license to market a plan, you don't need a license for someone to give you money to start a business, nor do you need a license to put the pieces together for the creation of that business. A license is necessary to operate as a business, not to form one.
Vod mentioned a 'corporation' and 'board of directors', where did he get that from, not from me. Clearly it originated in his head and now he is spreading the notion to others. Given that Vod wrote this: "stakeholders (no corporation license!)" its clear to me that Vod confused "stakeholders" with "stockholders". And that is probably why he wrongly went down that wrong corporate path. Again he allowed his preconceived notions to prejudice his judgement.
and lastly,
Vod mentioned 'collection of large sums of money', he really needs to explain that because PICISI does plan on making large sums of money, over and over again, and I have no intention of running away from our success.