Pages:
Author

Topic: HOdlcoin CPU Solo Mining Guide - page 5. (Read 32781 times)

sr. member
Activity: 462
Merit: 250
March 27, 2016, 07:37:55 AM
#40
Is HOdlcoin more porfitable than mining Decred or Ethereum?

HOdlcoin can only be mined with CPU, while Ethereum and Decred are only profitable with GPU, so you can mine both at the same time with your CPU and GPU
newbie
Activity: 56
Merit: 0
March 27, 2016, 07:33:46 AM
#39
Is HOdlcoin more porfitable than mining Decred or Ethereum?
sr. member
Activity: 462
Merit: 250
March 26, 2016, 09:43:21 AM
#38
Hello everybody,

I have another question that might fall into the topic Ubuntu.
Currently I reach via SSH to my Ubuntu and the Miner.
Would if I now close my SSH connection, the QT further mineral or stop working?

Greeting Christian

It should continue to work, if you want to check: run the miner, disconnect, reconnect, run "top" and see if you can still see the process.
member
Activity: 105
Merit: 10
March 26, 2016, 09:19:27 AM
#37
Hello everybody,

I have another question that might fall into the topic Ubuntu.
Currently I reach via SSH to my Ubuntu and the Miner.
Would if I now close my SSH connection, the QT further mineral or stop working?

Greeting Christian
newbie
Activity: 3
Merit: 0
March 24, 2016, 07:41:48 AM
#36
To resolve the following issue please install boost 1.57

Hi!
I've gotten compilation error. I follow the mentioned steps. Could you look?

make
Making all in src
make[1]: Вход в каталог `/home/mgridin/1000GB/projects/HOdlcoin-HODLCoin0.11.3/src'
make[2]: Вход в каталог `/home/mgridin/1000GB/projects/HOdlcoin-HODLCoin0.11.3/src'
  CXX      crypto/libbitcoinconsensus_la-hmac_sha512.lo
  CXX      crypto/libbitcoinconsensus_la-ripemd160.lo
  CXX      crypto/libbitcoinconsensus_la-sha1.lo
  CXX      crypto/libbitcoinconsensus_la-sha256.lo
  CXX      crypto/libbitcoinconsensus_la-sha512.lo
  CXX      libbitcoinconsensus_la-eccryptoverify.lo
  CXX      libbitcoinconsensus_la-ecwrapper.lo
  CXX      libbitcoinconsensus_la-hash.lo
  CXX      primitives/libbitcoinconsensus_la-transaction.lo
In file included from primitives/transaction.cpp:18:0:
./test/bignum.h: In member function 'uint64_t CBigNum::getuint64()':
./test/bignum.h:88:49: warning: comparison between signed and unsigned integer expressions [-Wsign-compare]
             for (int i = 0, j = vch.size()-1; i < sizeof(n) && j >= 4; i++, j--)
                                                 ^
At global scope:
cc1plus: warning: unrecognized command line option '-Wno-self-assign'
  CXX      libbitcoinconsensus_la-pubkey.lo
  CXX      script/libbitcoinconsensus_la-bitcoinconsensus.lo
  CXX      script/libbitcoinconsensus_la-interpreter.lo
  CXX      script/libbitcoinconsensus_la-script.lo
  CXX      libbitcoinconsensus_la-uint256.lo
  CXX      libbitcoinconsensus_la-utilstrencodings.lo
  CXXLD    libbitcoinconsensus.la
  CXX      hodlcoind-bitcoind.o
  CXX      libbitcoin_server_a-addrman.o
  CXX      libbitcoin_server_a-alert.o
  CXX      libbitcoin_server_a-bloom.o
  CXX      libbitcoin_server_a-chain.o
  CXX      libbitcoin_server_a-checkpoints.o
  CXX      libbitcoin_server_a-init.o
In file included from ./support/pagelocker.h:14:0,
                 from support/allocators/secure.h:9,
                 from key.h:11,
                 from init.cpp:17:
/usr/include/boost/thread/once.hpp: In instantiation of ‘void boost::call_once(Function, boost::once_flag&) [with Function = void (*)()]’:
./support/pagelocker.h:138:89:   required from here
[font=Verdana]/usr/include/boost/thread/once.hpp:38:18: error: no matching function for call to ‘call_once(boost::once_flag&, void (*&)())’
        call_once(flag,func);[/color][/color][/font]
                  ^
In file included from /usr/include/boost/thread/once.hpp:20:0,
                 from ./support/pagelocker.h:14,
                 from support/allocators/secure.h:9,
                 from key.h:11,
                 from init.cpp:17:
/usr/include/boost/thread/pthread/once_atomic.hpp:121:15: note: candidate: template void boost::call_once(boost::once_flag&, boost::detail::thread_move_t, boost::detail::thread_move_t...)
   inline void call_once(once_flag& flag, BOOST_THREAD_RV_REF(Function) f, BOOST_THREAD_RV_REF(ArgTypes)... args)
               ^
/usr/include/boost/thread/pthread/once_atomic.hpp:121:15: note:   template argument deduction/substitution failed:
In file included from ./support/pagelocker.h:14:0,
                 from support/allocators/secure.h:9,
                 from key.h:11,
                 from init.cpp:17:
/usr/include/boost/thread/once.hpp:38:18: note:   mismatched types ‘boost::detail::thread_move_t’ and ‘void (*)()’
         call_once(flag,func);
                  ^
/usr/include/boost/thread/once.hpp:35:13: note: candidate: template void boost::call_once(Function, boost::once_flag&)
 inline void call_once(Function func,once_flag& flag)
             ^
/usr/include/boost/thread/once.hpp:35:13: note:   template argument deduction/substitution failed:
/usr/include/boost/thread/once.hpp:38:18: note:   cannot convert ‘func’ (type ‘void (*)()’) to type ‘boost::once_flag&’
         call_once(flag,func);
                  ^
cc1plus: warning: unrecognized command line option ‘-Wno-self-assign’
make[2]: *** [libbitcoin_server_a-init.o] Ошибка 1
make[2]: Выход из каталога `/home/mgridin/1000GB/projects/HOdlcoin-HODLCoin0.11.3/src'
make[1]: *** [all-recursive] Ошибка 1
make[1]: Выход из каталога `/home/mgridin/1000GB/projects/HOdlcoin-HODLCoin0.11.3/src'
make: *** [all-recursive] Ошибка 1
full member
Activity: 179
Merit: 100
G'day!
March 21, 2016, 06:16:48 PM
#35
Just tested with Ubuntu 15.10 Wily Werewolf

You can take out the second line for this Linux version, not required. Git is part of the package.

s̶u̶d̶o̶ ̶a̶p̶t̶-̶g̶e̶t̶ ̶i̶n̶s̶t̶a̶l̶l̶ ̶c̶h̶e̶c̶k̶i̶n̶s̶t̶a̶l̶l̶ ̶s̶u̶b̶v̶e̶r̶s̶i̶o̶n̶ ̶g̶i̶t̶ ̶g̶i̶t̶-̶c̶o̶r̶e̶

Tested working in VirtualBox as well.


sr. member
Activity: 490
Merit: 250
March 19, 2016, 12:40:23 PM
#34
Ist this okay so?

17:39:06

getmininginfo


17:39:06

{
"blocks" : 25124,
"currentblocksize" : 1000,
"currentblocktx" : 0,
"difficulty" : 0.00188724,
"errors" : "",
"genproclimit" : -1,
"networkhashps" : 56241,
"pooledtx" : 0,
"testnet" : false,
"chain" : "main",
"generate" : false,
"hashespersec" : 22
}
legendary
Activity: 2716
Merit: 1094
Black Belt Developer
March 13, 2016, 02:05:06 PM
#33
no gpu miner for this? what is the algo?

No name yet: it's 1gb of sha512 where aes searches are made. Reminds of cryptonight.
GPU miner possible but likely to have similar efficiency as cpu.
full member
Activity: 224
Merit: 100
March 13, 2016, 02:02:12 PM
#32
no gpu miner for this? what is the algo?
legendary
Activity: 2716
Merit: 1094
Black Belt Developer
March 13, 2016, 01:13:00 PM
#31
If I don't specify a miningaddress but just do "./hodlcoind -gen", will it automatically mine to the local address?

It will create a new address for every mined block on the local wallet. AFAIK, it's the usual behaviour of solo mining for the crypto coins.
sr. member
Activity: 462
Merit: 250
March 13, 2016, 12:27:18 PM
#30
If I don't specify a miningaddress but just do "./hodlcoind -gen", will it automatically mine to the local address?
legendary
Activity: 2716
Merit: 1094
Black Belt Developer
March 11, 2016, 05:14:40 AM
#29
Looks like not everybody still understand that, given the difficulty, the probability of finding a block is the same regardless of the time you mine; i.e. it's the same after 1 second and after 1 day or 1 week.
newbie
Activity: 62
Merit: 0
March 10, 2016, 11:35:04 PM
#28
I found a block within my first hour of mining Wink
newbie
Activity: 13
Merit: 0
March 07, 2016, 02:00:08 PM
#27
stil nothing with my i7, but i'm using only 3 core otherwise i will not be able to do anything else
how long does it take for 1 block?
for me 8 or 9 h   for 1 block = 50 hodlcoin
  i using 7 core  Grin leave  it  alone

So there is no chance if you are only using a dual core to mine HOdlcoin if I am going to replace my dual core and upgrade to octacore it will cost me $150 to our local currency might as well spend it to gpu so I can mine other coins and this coin too
after 14 15h  still nothing  my balans go up  slowly  0.1 !!  but no block found i have only 50 ! Huh Huh Huh
why Sad


If that is the case then it's time to give up mining alone it's not worth it anymore,pool mining is still the most preferable way to mine any coins with so many miners mining this coin the difficulty is now very high
give up mining alone  too  today after 17h nothing no block founding ... mining this coin the difficulty is now very high
legendary
Activity: 2450
Merit: 1047
thecryptocurrency.directory
March 06, 2016, 01:27:10 PM
#26
stil nothing with my i7, but i'm using only 3 core otherwise i will not be able to do anything else
how long does it take for 1 block?
for me 8 or 9 h   for 1 block = 50 hodlcoin
  i using 7 core  Grin leave  it  alone

So there is no chance if you are only using a dual core to mine HOdlcoin if I am going to replace my dual core and upgrade to octacore it will cost me $150 to our local currency might as well spend it to gpu so I can mine other coins and this coin too
after 14 15h  still nothing  my balans go up  slowly  0.1 !!  but no block found i have only 50 ! Huh Huh Huh
why Sad


If that is the case then it's time to give up mining alone it's not worth it anymore,pool mining is still the most preferable way to mine any coins with so many miners mining this coin the difficulty is now very high
newbie
Activity: 13
Merit: 0
March 06, 2016, 12:29:32 PM
#25
stil nothing with my i7, but i'm using only 3 core otherwise i will not be able to do anything else
how long does it take for 1 block?
for me 8 or 9 h   for 1 block = 50 hodlcoin
  i using 7 core  Grin leave  it  alone

So there is no chance if you are only using a dual core to mine HOdlcoin if I am going to replace my dual core and upgrade to octacore it will cost me $150 to our local currency might as well spend it to gpu so I can mine other coins and this coin too
after 14 15h  still nothing  my balans go up  slowly  0.1 !!  but no block found i have only 50 ! Huh Huh Huh
why Sad
legendary
Activity: 3192
Merit: 1198
Bons.io Telegram Casino
March 06, 2016, 04:10:19 AM
#24
stil nothing with my i7, but i'm using only 3 core otherwise i will not be able to do anything else
how long does it take for 1 block?
for me 8 or 9 h   for 1 block = 50 hodlcoin
  i using 7 core  Grin leave  it  alone

So there is no chance if you are only using a dual core to mine HOdlcoin if I am going to replace my dual core and upgrade to octacore it will cost me $150 to our local currency might as well spend it to gpu so I can mine other coins and this coin too
sr. member
Activity: 490
Merit: 250
March 05, 2016, 06:26:34 PM
#23
stil nothing with my i7, but i'm using only 3 core otherwise i will not be able to do anything else
how long does it take for 1 block?

This is odd.. I have a i7-3820 running 8 cores 100% and I have a lot open..

2 windows of chrome open with 50+ tabs open in them..
1 firefox window open with 20 tabs open..
Adobe PS open with 8 windows open inside
8 windows of Putty open
excel open..
4 other wallets open
23 windows of Paint open..

all on 3 monitors


Sidenote 3 threads will round up to 4.. Threads must be powers of 2 (2,4,8...)
newbie
Activity: 13
Merit: 0
March 05, 2016, 05:28:57 AM
#22
stil nothing with my i7, but i'm using only 3 core otherwise i will not be able to do anything else
how long does it take for 1 block?
for me 8 or 9 h   for 1 block = 50 hodlcoin
  i using 7 core  Grin leave  it  alone
legendary
Activity: 2590
Merit: 1022
Leading Crypto Sports Betting & Casino Platform
March 05, 2016, 05:00:47 AM
#21
stil nothing with my i7, but i'm using only 3 core otherwise i will not be able to do anything else
how long does it take for 1 block?
Pages:
Jump to: