Topic: Hot ICOs of October with low market caps - page 7. (Read 4414 times)

Great list. You explained everything perfectly.

Upfiring and Airswap are definitely very interesting. The prices are definitely a lot lower than Siacoin and Filecoin, and there has been a while since we've seen a boom in file based altcoins and i believe we may see one any moment now. Maybe Enjincoin as well, though i'm not sure whether there is going to be a particularly big interest for that small niche of people that will ever need to use Enjincoin.

Damn, too much ICO's. I'm holding too much alts, cant participate anymore 

Airtoken will have some challenges. There have been other services with a similar aim, but failed. The only place you really still see this model is airports.

Nice thread to have a perspective about ongoing icos here.

I saw LAToken platform, but their market cap is about 15-20m $ at the moment.

You can check peerguess project. I really liked this one when I saw it for the first time. Their sale not started yet.

https://peerguess.com/

https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/ann-guess-peerguess-collaborative-cryptocurrency-ticker-ico-28-october-2199333

The other one is bitjob project. They will have agreements with the universities in the future. The sale is ongoing.

https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/ann-bitjob-decentralized-student-marketplace-for-online-jobs-2108421

How about Hazza, Hazza is payment wallet model. It is based in Hongkong. I think it will be succesful like ten x pay, the start price of ICO is 0.35. Not too high and not too ow price. The possibility to increase the price in exchanger to 1 usd is very achieveble. with 1 USD the investor will make profit.

Very nice thread, I will keep an eye on it. Are you planning on adding more and writing new reviews? For all of those you mentioned I only heard of EnjinCoin, because they have a campaign here in the forum. I saw their project and I agree with you, they look nice. I also saw a few things on Filecoin and  ArtToken by Capasity. They look like nice projects as well, what are your opinion on them?

Finally I would also like to hear your opinion on Unify. Not because I'm on their campaign, but because I also liked their project, mainly because it was so simple, that it really looks that it can be achievable. And since they are actually attempting to promote crypo knowledge in general, it looks like something important to me, because we all know how adoption will be important for bitcoin and crypto in general, so a project like this could help.

Good list, but largely incomplete. In fact, there are at least five times more ICOs running now - that I am aware of, plus all which I am not aware of. Actually, most of your listed ICOs where unknown to me. Therefore thanks for your excellent work of listing.

Thx for the thread, found it very helpful
i found the wanchain interesting, going to research a little bit
the token sale is over, but can not trade yet, and i can not find the max supply of coins + ico price

I think Electroneum is also a gud project

regarding enjin coin...

what do you guys think about that coin?

it seems interesting but i would love to learn more about it..

did anyone of you invest in that coin?

what is their USP? i am not sure if I really understand their business model.

their pre-ico was pretty sucessful but i am not sure what they exactly are going to solve...

please explain

I would add also ETHLend, which is making ICO right now and seems very successful. And of course WEpower, which I am supporting

which of them still going on?

thanks for this info .. keep it up.

Thanks for this great info, will check out wanchain

SEC can't stop them from working in other countries. Вrickblock is under the jurisdiction of Gibraltar and they have no problems with regulation.

How will this be done legally though? Stock trading through blockchain is one of the things the SEC explicitly said they won't permit.

Great list of tokens, I completely agree with the author. But I also have added Brickblock.

Airtoken seems like a company that is already successful just launching a vague ICO to raise more money. The cap is low so maybe investors will see profits anyway, but like jlp said it seems be a lot of marketing without a real foundation for a product/use of the coin.

And yes, what is the point of Ambrosus. It sounds good until you actually start thinking about why it would ever need blockchain...then it makes no sense. 

Airtoken is lying or sounds like a pipe dream. In order to pay the users for advertising, Airtoken will need to get advertisers and earn advertising revenue. Then it needs complicated processes to show the ads where the advertisers want, to charge properly and to share the revenue with users. This incurs significant costs and is a huge undertaking, which requires much more than just creating an Ethereum token. They need to show how they will be able to do these numerous processes much more cheaply than the existing companies, in order to be able to share some of the advertising revenue with users. Have they ever done anything similar to this before? Probably not. They have 6 reviews of their AirFox Browser on Google Play, probably by people who saw their ICO.

Airtoken’s website states: “Publishers will have higher monetization, new user reach, and a better user experience.” But its white paper does not explain how. Is this blowing smoke?

There is another major problem with Airtoken: Micro-loans, which is a complicated, costly and money-losing business. Google “micro loan failure” and you’ll see articles like:


Micro loans was concocted by emotional socialists who think with their hearts instead of their brains, which always makes a country poorer.

The Airtoken team only needs to do 5 minutes of research on micro-loans and would have found the above. This means that they are dishonest. If they did not do the research, then they are incompetent.

I agree with EnjinCoin.  You can add Unikoin and Stockbet to that category.

Ambrosus doesn’t make sense.  Why do we need a new altcoin to record the history of products?  Even if you record the history of products on the blockchain, how do you know the data is accurate?  How can you trust the inputters of data?  How do you know it isn’t put in by the manufacturers, who will exaggerate or lie?  This sounds like another project trying to put the kitchen sink onto the blockchain.

Read:

There are 3 types of ICOs - Protect Yourself
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/3-kinds-of-icos-protect-yourself-2243157

Thanks for this list!