They should buy Lisk, very cheap right now.
Topic: How can people be buying eth right now? - page 7. (Read 8223 times)
Lisk has not shown relative strenght yet. This was the reason why I did not consider it as an real alternative to Ethereum. However, the last two days have depicted a different image. If it cross the $.50 mark clearly than I would consider to see it as an alternative for investment to Ethereum.
over priced and over pumped by whales and their bots, simple as that.
teh recent DAO fud helped.....real or not. as usual now it goes down....then pumps again.
so stupid.
teh recent DAO fud helped.....real or not. as usual now it goes down....then pumps again.
so stupid.
If you find the right timing, you could make a lot of profit. You might need a smart trading bot to do that.
over priced and over pumped by whales and their bots, simple as that.
teh recent DAO fud helped.....real or not. as usual now it goes down....then pumps again.
so stupid.
teh recent DAO fud helped.....real or not. as usual now it goes down....then pumps again.
so stupid.
So more DAO is disappearing. No one really knows if it's getting forked or how it's getting forked. No one knows when or if it becomes POS. And it's still rising? Looks like this Vitalik guy has built a coin that cannot die. Who the hell wouldn't throw all their money at it?
We are discussing a project that mostly consists of a premined ICO coins where most of the coins are controlled by a very small group of devs and early investors . It is trivial to keep the price up under said circumstances.
What to watch out for is when devs start leaving , that is the sign reflecting a turning point where the premine is not paying the bills anymore.
So more DAO is disappearing. No one really knows if it's getting forked or how it's getting forked. No one knows when or if it becomes POS. And it's still rising? Looks like this Vitalik guy has built a coin that cannot die. Who the hell wouldn't throw all their money at it?
Yeah, there's no accounting for why people buy shitty-ass coins in general. Is eth supposed to be dead or what? I don't read crypto news, since I don't understand 99% of it anyway. I'm sure it's all the bagholders keeping eth afloat.
I think so. But those bagholders have deep pockets. The Bitcoin dropped a lot today, but Ethereum is rising.
I am not buying it.. but I am still mining it.. 
Yeah, there's no accounting for why people buy shitty-ass coins in general. Is eth supposed to be dead or what? I don't read crypto news, since I don't understand 99% of it anyway. I'm sure it's all the bagholders keeping eth afloat.
there is blood in the water and people are generally really fucking stupid around here.
It doesn't make any sense. Is it being manipulated by top bagholders who are using their money to keep buying the sell offs to give it the smoke and mirror effect of looking like Eth isn't bleeding out?
There was a panic selloff followed by an over-correction. The next phase will be a slow and painful decline.
~~
This...huge selloff due to hack (likely sold off more than justified). Who knows where its headed next though...
It doesn't make any sense. Is it being manipulated by top bagholders who are using their money to keep buying the sell offs to give it the smoke and mirror effect of looking like Eth isn't bleeding out?
Hahaha just defined some people try to buy ETH with implemented for next time ETH will rise up and gain their price before got attacked but it's just an assume for some people. for me,i'm not interested in buying eth for now.Big holder will think again to manipulate ETH market. 
The demise of Ethereum is underway now:
The "attacker" is winning. That was much less than 20% when I looked it a few hours ago.
Nobody in the DAO will ever get their tokens back.
Checkmate.
It seems 20% of the miners in the ethpool.org do not agree with that. They do not think taking 4% etherum out of circulation is a good idea.
http://ethpool.org/stats/votes
http://ethpool.org/stats/votes
The "attacker" is winning. That was much less than 20% when I looked it a few hours ago.
Nobody in the DAO will ever get their tokens back.
Checkmate.
Disagree, The Attacker has already won. The Eth investor wins if a HF is prevented, because such a scenario would fatally and permanently ruin Ethereum. The only winners of the vote for a HF are DAO token holder who immediately choose to sell their retrieved ETH and get out before Ethereum takes a long and steady decline .
Yes of course, I have also written the "attacker" also wins if Ethereum is able to commit a HF. But I mean I don't even think they will be capable of doing the HF, because the "attacker" controls too much free ETH enabling him to economically influence the hashrate to not accept the HF.
Ethereum is a dead fly on the wall waiting for the final swat.
If there is a soft fork, the attaker's Eth is locked, or useless, how can he use the eth to influence the miners?
The miners he is paying won't be on the soft fork. They will continue mining on original Ethereum because they don't want their free tokens to be stolen from them by the fork. Who ever controls the most hashrate wins (unless the all of the ETH owners decide to only transact on a minority hashrate chain but that has double-spend risks).
Note the reason there might be demand for ETH is many people piling on short. Shorting removes supply from the market.
The demise of Ethereum is underway now:
The "attacker" is winning. That was much less than 20% when I looked it a few hours ago.
Nobody in the DAO will ever get their tokens back.
Checkmate.
It seems 20% of the miners in the ethpool.org do not agree with that. They do not think taking 4% etherum out of circulation is a good idea.
http://ethpool.org/stats/votes
http://ethpool.org/stats/votes
The "attacker" is winning. That was much less than 20% when I looked it a few hours ago.
Nobody in the DAO will ever get their tokens back.
Checkmate.
Disagree, The Attacker has already won. The Eth investor wins if a HF is prevented, because such a scenario would fatally and permanently ruin Ethereum. The only winners of the vote for a HF are DAO token holder who immediately choose to sell their retrieved ETH and get out before Ethereum takes a long and steady decline .
Yes of course, I have also written the "attacker" also wins if Ethereum is able to commit a HF. But I mean I don't even think they will be capable of doing the HF, because the "attacker" controls too much free ETH enabling him to economically influence the hashrate to not accept the HF.
Ethereum is a dead fly on the wall waiting for the final swat.
If there is a soft fork, the attaker's Eth is locked, or useless, how can he use the eth to influence the miners?
Cos its cheap..
Feel free to tip me at the address below
Feel free to tip me at the address below
The demise of Ethereum is underway now:
The "attacker" is winning. That was much less than 20% when I looked it a few hours ago.
Nobody in the DAO will ever get their tokens back.
Checkmate.
It seems 20% of the miners in the ethpool.org do not agree with that. They do not think taking 4% etherum out of circulation is a good idea.
http://ethpool.org/stats/votes
http://ethpool.org/stats/votes
The "attacker" is winning. That was much less than 20% when I looked it a few hours ago.
Nobody in the DAO will ever get their tokens back.
Checkmate.
Disagree, The Attacker has already won. The Eth investor wins if a HF is prevented, because such a scenario would fatally and permanently ruin Ethereum. The only winners of the vote for a HF are DAO token holder who immediately choose to sell their retrieved ETH and get out before Ethereum takes a long and steady decline .
Yes of course, I have also written the "attacker" also wins if Ethereum is able to commit a HF. But I mean I don't even think they will be capable of doing the HF, because the "attacker" controls too much free ETH enabling him to economically influence the hashrate to not accept the HF.
Ethereum is a dead fly on the wall waiting for the final swat.
They should buy Lisk, very cheap right now.
The demise of Ethereum is underway now:
The "attacker" is winning. That was much less than 20% when I looked it a few hours ago.
Nobody in the DAO will ever get their tokens back.
Checkmate.
It seems 20% of the miners in the ethpool.org do not agree with that. They do not think taking 4% etherum out of circulation is a good idea.
http://ethpool.org/stats/votes
http://ethpool.org/stats/votes
The "attacker" is winning. That was much less than 20% when I looked it a few hours ago.
Nobody in the DAO will ever get their tokens back.
Checkmate.
Disagree, The Attacker has already won. The Eth investor wins if a HF is prevented, because such a scenario would fatally and permanently ruin Ethereum. The only winners of the vote for a HF are DAO token holder who immediately choose to sell their retrieved ETH and get out before Ethereum takes a long and steady decline .
The demise of Ethereum is underway now:
The "attacker" is winning. That was much less than 20% when I looked it a few hours ago.
Nobody in the DAO will ever get their tokens back.
Checkmate.
It seems 20% of the miners in the ethpool.org do not agree with that. They do not think taking 4% etherum out of circulation is a good idea.
http://ethpool.org/stats/votes
http://ethpool.org/stats/votes
The "attacker" is winning. That was much less than 20% when I looked it a few hours ago.
Nobody in the DAO will ever get their tokens back.
Checkmate.
Exactly. intel, amd, nvidia all stand to sell a ton more gear if eth coin survives.
Why would any of these companies give a fuck about eth? At the very best there are a few thousand miners, who already own the stuff they need, vs hundreds of millions of computer users and gamers.
Jump to: