Topic: How can we support Bitcoin if Satoshi demands life sentencing for non-violence (Read 364 times)

The ideals of the one you claim is Satoshi is completely opposite of what Bitcoin represents. This is part of the reason we believe he's not Satoshi, as Satoshi ideals are in his creation, works and writings. Whoever or whatever claims he/it is Satoshi but goes against the Bitcoin ideals/principles is fake satoshi  and should not be taken seriously. Even Bitcoin will not listen to such person as he doesn't speak the language it understands. Both (Bitcoin and fake satoshi) are incompatible.

In regards to demanding life sentences for ulbrich, well, if he actually purposely use his marketplace for evil especially for things that are very harmful to society then people like him typically reap what they sow which could be as bad as a life sentence. Other than that, his marketplace seems to be free as Bitcoin, maybe with lack of transparency which maybe necessary to expose evil. Tech like that are typically used by all kinds of characters  but they ought to be built responsibly to prevent bad behaviors or abuse. Fair rules, Reputation, Transparency, Moderation, etc would have made the tech more responsible and that could help the inventor avoid harsh punishment like maximum of 5 years imprisonment.


Bitcoin will remain decentralized and transparent p2p system for people who want to use money naturally and morally. But people who love money (the love of it is the problem) tend to ignore this important safe guards which is why money is often used as bait to get them trapped and enslaved in the fait system and restricted by its unpleasant features.

Alert! BS coming through! I mean, how much were you paid to come spew this rubbish? Like seriously? Peeps like you should get quarantined to avoid the spread of such hogwash. Craig is not Satoshi. His wannabe? Maybe.
You need reasons as to why your claims are just a desperate attempt to gain attention? Here goes; he NEVER signed any message on a known Bitcoin address that could be widely verified as Satoshi's signature..

One thing is that anyone can even come out and claim that they are Satoshi. For example, I can say that I am Satoshi, but does that mean I am the real investor in Bitcoin? The one person who would not know that Craig is not the investor of Bitcoin should be a newbie who is still learning about Bitcoin, but it's even simpler to know the founder of Bitcoin when you Google the question.
Perhaps the so-called individual claiming to be Satoshi doesn't even have a large amount of Bitcoin in their wallet, like some addresses that hold a large sum of Bitcoin, which they refer to as belonging to Satoshi.

I wonder what it is with you so-called OGs who wake up one day and decide to make fools of themselves after all that we could hear and read over the years when it comes to Faketoshi. There are people who believe in solid facts, and then there are those who believe in fairy tales, which is nothing bad if you are a 5-year-old child.

Nevertheless, for consolation, you are not alone in your beliefs, even the famous Gavin Andresen at one point shared the same opinions as you, which is even more strange considering that he is a man who was one of the closest associates of Satoshi Nakamoto. It might be a good idea to contact him (send him a PM on the forum) and ask him if he still feels stupid because of his statements.

If none of that helps and you still think that Faketoshi is the real Satoshi, I suggest you move to Colombia, because there they still think a little differently than the rest of the world.

Well, one thing is certain..... Satoshi Nakamoto never chased fame and fortune like CW is doing with a passion.    That in it self should be enough proof for anyone that has read any of Satoshi Nakamoto's emails and correspondence that still exist.

The mere fact that CW are constantly trying to be relevant and fighting over patents in court, shows that he is a snake oil salesman. He even conned a seasoned Bitcoiner and developer like Gavin, so it is understandable that he confused you too.

Just use your energy to focus on a future where CW will finally be out of the picture, because the truth will expose him. Satoshi can settle this issue with one signed message to say that CW is a scammer.... so let's hope this happens soon.  

Tend to agree, particularly as the precedent for Ross' sentencing implies that they would continue to go up the technology 'chain' to apply proportiante sentencing to Craig as he was also a non-direct non-violent participator in facilitating the Silk Road project.   That Craig was not summoned and to this day has not yet faced charges for his role is by some measures more proof he is not Satoshi. 


Thanks, it is nice to see a healthy debate & discussion of ideas and opinions after all these years.   Despite all of the new user growth this is still better than the cesspool known as Reddit!   May the original spirit of Aaron and Satoshi live on. 

How possible is it for someone who is anonymous to sent to a life imprisonment for non violence which means he committed nothing, how about the anonymity as well, how can you get an anonymous person, apprehend him and for doing a non violence act, we can by ourselves see that this is almost impossible to do, others have also made this attempts proclaiming Satoshi but they wouldn't have any proof on it, what can support Satoshi is it's network by being ever relevant.

If there's no reason for SegWit I believe the Bitcoin community won't have support and I can see that you pay much more attention to its disadvantages than the advantages and there's no way to a solution without coming up with its own problem.

The so-called passion of CSW you talked about was just a marketing and strategy pull-up to get the attention and trust of some of the Bitcoin enthusiasts. However, if you want to see the facts about his (CSW) true intention you'll agree that there's no reason for him to make a false claim about being Satoshi in order to drive community support to his trash coin (BSV).

If Craig was just the real Satoshi, he would have been arrested already and forced by the government to edit those codes, you know how much they are trying to control BTC to the extent that Blackrock is now buying the one asset they use to call scam.


It's a fact also. I think we can agree with the fact that Ross should have gotten a lighter jail time. It seems like they have really doomed the life of him. Other crimes he did I think weren't proven. Like the one where he gave a hit to an agent.

You are a true OG. It's great to try to use the technology in real life. Your worries about what Craig thinks about Ross Ulbricht and the morals of Bitcoin SV are valid. Many people in crypto find it hard to understand what those fucking leaders are doing. But, like you, many of us joined Bitcoin because of faith - freedom.

Using money is hard. Bitcoin is just another "system". Though, Can any monetary system ever be truly free from the human tendency to centralize power or authority? For decentralisation to work, you might have to give up your dream of going back to nature and living in a world of direct trade and trust. Even though it has flaws, Bitcoin is our best bet against fiat. Many people dream of a heaven where there are no third-party systems. It has problems, just like any dream. Time will tell how well Bitcoin can solve this problem, which is why it was created in the first place. Keep going in the same direction and see where this "current sea" takes us.

There is stupidly enough evidence that suggests CSW is a clown show, from altering old blog post to seem as if he was talking about cryptocurrency in 2008 and arguing he's Satoshi without cryptographic evidence, to having himself proved false by the actual owner of Craig-claimed addresses as shown in here and contradicting himself with actual Satoshi claims as shown by the Twitter post above.

just because ross used bitcoin.. does not absolve him of other crimes related to running a drugs market place. nor absolve him of desires to hire hitmen..

bitcoin is just currency. its not a law breaker.
scammers and tyrants and idiots and such still need to take responsibility for their actions

even if [people say] ross never touched drugs personally. wilfully and in full knowledge of allowing illicit trade to be done in your property can lead to you getting into legal trouble. personally profiting from these illicit activities definitely will get you in trouble


satoshi made bitcoin to be patentless.. he made it open source so there was no control. he even left the community to avoid being treated as a decision maker/owner.. he even stayed out of the press and declined interviews to hide from self promotion

CSW however wants to claim bitcoin(falsely) has his. he files patents and self promotes.

see the difference

My solution to this is the same as of many people: I don't believe that Craig is Satoshi, and thus I have no issue with what he says vs what Bitcoin stands for. I don't think Ross belongs in prison, I support the idea that he should be freed. Craig is an annoying person who failed to prove his claim of being Satoshi over and over again, and there's literally zero evidence that he is Satoshi. If you're serious, op, I hope that the overwhelming opinion that Craig is not Satoshi, which you can partly find in this very thread, will convince you. If you're looking for evidence, even starting with something as simple as sources below the English Wikipedia page on Craig can help with that.

You mean apart from literally everything CSW has ever said? Lol.

Fair enough, thanks for the link I'll read more into that.

Not shilling for him, primarily this was a shot at his backwards views anyway - from that point engaging in the resulting debate; definitely gathered a lot of input thankyou.

I vote for public execution and a walk of shame before  that, for the judge of course.

---

Anyone here knows how to contact this real Satoshi? I feel I am missing out on a lot of opportunities, what he needs is a few high rank members to constantly shill for him, shilling is my expertise.

Here is my resume :

OMG, Crai.. I mean the real satoshi is coming guys look! This is said when he walks in.

OMG, crai.. I mean the real satoshi is leaving the building guys, look!  This is said when he walks out.

Note, I'd need cheerleading outfit ( very short skirt is the best, preferably pink  ), I can also twerk all the way from court entrance to his car. 😉😅

Thanks @tbct_mt2 but those are just threads  mostly speculation and not actually Satoshi's words.

this is a better resource for those words:

https://satoshi.nakamotoinstitute.org

I haven't combed through everything but of the initial threads I've reviewed so far none have said anything out of Craig's character.

If you find or have something specific Satoshi says that would be out of  line with Craig's views, please share it ex: "fuck patents, fuck the government, you can use this to sell drugs" etc

It would not be hard to pinpoint some comments that are clearly out of Craig's character given Craig indicates Christian (Catholic then Protestant) background and demonstrates fairly strong morals (even if off base sometimes; ie- he is stubborn) along with IMO a few cringe boomer views on various global issues.

Craig is not Satoshi Nakamoto. He is one of Faketoshi.

Who is Satoshi Nakamoto ? Suspects, frauds and conspiracies on bitcointalk
I gathered every Satoshi Nakamoto thread.

Satoshi Nakamoto is alive or dead or get arrested in future, it won't be matter for Bitcoin network because he does not have a power to pull a request and shut down the Bitcoin network immediately by himself. The network is decentralized and Satoshi Nakamoto can not do anything.

Same here, The moment I read what you quoted, I came to the conclusion that I have to ready my popcorn because this will end up into a debacle especially when this kind of idea is thrown here in the forum   This might have a chance of success to garner a believer if posted in another forum but not here.  I stopped reading that wall of text and excitingly waited for the refute to the @OP's post.  This will be an educational and a good read thread, not because of @OP's post but the refutes on @OP's proposition of Craig being Satoshi.