Though it's the campaign manager's choice to get whoever he wants, i too feel it's unfair for the lower ranked members especially if they have tried to apply too.
Higher ranked members should only be considered if there are no eligible lower ranked members of that particular spot who have applied, otherwise why would a campaign manager announce open lower ranked member spots yet when it comes to selection they favor higher ranked members for the same spots?
It doesn't make sense. Why not just make only higher member spots if lower ranks are not preferred for the campaign?
But hey like i say again. It's the CM's personal choice.
Topic: How legit it is! - page 2. (Read 377 times)
Selection of participants fully depends on the bounty manager. It's up to him if he wants to consider a higher level account for a lower level postion in his campaign.
As per I think its a smart way of selecting participants, if there are no eligible participants for a lower level posting in signature campaign than it is better to hire a higher level at same payment rates. Some of the advantages accepting higher level accounts are.
1. firstly its good for the project as they will get advertised by a higher level member at lower rates.
2. Helps bounty manager to fill up all the position if there are not much eligible participants for a specific rank.
3. Gives opportunity to some members who, don't get a spot in higher level position. ( its better than nothing )
4. Better alterative to hiring a spammer.
By considering some of the above reasons, it's rather a good approach to consider a higher level participate for a lower level spot.
I saw several projects where it's happened. Higher ranked people accepted instead of the exact rank though there is a lower rank person available with good posts as well as meet all requirement. If any lower rank can't be accepted when upper rank applied. Then why not opening post only for legendary as there is a lot of legendary ranked people? I think accepting higher ranked people instead of exact rank is nothing but only the exploitation of lower ranked people.As per I think its a smart way of selecting participants, if there are no eligible participants for a lower level posting in signature campaign than it is better to hire a higher level at same payment rates. Some of the advantages accepting higher level accounts are.
1. firstly its good for the project as they will get advertised by a higher level member at lower rates.
2. Helps bounty manager to fill up all the position if there are not much eligible participants for a specific rank.
3. Gives opportunity to some members who, don't get a spot in higher level position. ( its better than nothing )
4. Better alterative to hiring a spammer.
By considering some of the above reasons, it's rather a good approach to consider a higher level participate for a lower level spot.
Most of the time it was by the participant 'permission' that they're okay with being paid on lower rank rates.
It is self-contradictory as the slot opened for another rank. 
But is it not self-contradictory as s/he will mention one type of rank and then will take from another rank?
Most of the time it was by the participant 'permission' that they're okay with being paid on lower rank rates. So it's not contradictory either. The manager only told us that he have allocated some spots for this rank, with this rate. However, I do agree that the allocated rank should be prioritized. So just because a Hero wants to be put on Member shoes, doesn't mean the manager should accept it, especially if there's a bunch of Members applying.
Selection of participants fully depends on the bounty manager. It's up to him if he wants to consider a higher level account for a lower level postion in his campaign.
As per I think its a smart way of selecting participants, if there are no eligible participants for a lower level posting in signature campaign than it is better to hire a higher level at same payment rates. Some of the advantages accepting higher level accounts are.
1. firstly its good for the project as they will get advertised by a higher level member at lower rates.
2. Helps bounty manager to fill up all the position if there are not much eligible participants for a specific rank.
3. Gives opportunity to some members who, don't get a spot in higher level position. ( its better than nothing )
4. Better alterative to hiring a spammer.
By considering some of the above reasons, it's rather a good approach to consider a higher level participate for a lower level spot.
As per I think its a smart way of selecting participants, if there are no eligible participants for a lower level posting in signature campaign than it is better to hire a higher level at same payment rates. Some of the advantages accepting higher level accounts are.
1. firstly its good for the project as they will get advertised by a higher level member at lower rates.
2. Helps bounty manager to fill up all the position if there are not much eligible participants for a specific rank.
3. Gives opportunity to some members who, don't get a spot in higher level position. ( its better than nothing )
4. Better alterative to hiring a spammer.
By considering some of the above reasons, it's rather a good approach to consider a higher level participate for a lower level spot.
It's valid and legit as much as it depends on the Campaign Manager. It's completely the Campaign Manager decisions whether to choose which rank Member should get the particular slot.
As there is no rule for that by the forum then campaign manager can take any decision on his/her own way. But is it not self-contradictory as s/he will mention one type of rank and then will take from another rank?What if no Member ranked users applied for the slot doesn't meet the requirements of the campaign? Then no doubt the campaign manager has to give the slot to another ranked user as no any other option left.
This is only my opinion.
I think the campaign manager will take from any other rank. But what will s/he will do if legendary rank is blank? Will s/he take from lower rank? If s/he will not take from lower rank, then s/he will take from an upper rank of a lower rank slot? This is only my opinion.
It's valid and legit as much as it depends on the Campaign Manager. It's completely the Campaign Manager decisions whether to choose which rank Member should get the particular slot.
Moreover as far you mentioned about your concern in the above post, so let me suggest you something. What if no Member ranked users applied for the slot doesn't meet the requirements of the campaign? Then no doubt the campaign manager has to give the slot to another ranked user as no any other option left.
This is only my opinion.
Moreover as far you mentioned about your concern in the above post, so let me suggest you something. What if no Member ranked users applied for the slot doesn't meet the requirements of the campaign? Then no doubt the campaign manager has to give the slot to another ranked user as no any other option left.
This is only my opinion.
I saw many signature campaigns where bounty manager declared specific rank, for example, Jr. member rank. And on that post, many high ranked member eg: hero/legendary member apply on that post. How legit it is? What can happen to it?
My personal opinion, it is not legit. Because:
1. When a Hero/Legendary member applies for a jr member and got accepted then the jr. member ranked person will lose their chance of acceptance.
2. When Hero/legendary member got jr. member rank and if ranked up then that positions people will lose their chance to be accepted. For example, if Sr. member ranked opened then previous accepted hero/legendary will get that position. In this case, sr. member is a loser for that hero/legendary member.
3. As payment of Jr. member is low so, when there is another project hero/legendary member will take that position. In that case, the position will open again and now bounty manager has to find out another person so many people will apply again.
So, I all-time there should have an issue if one position filled up by another positions people. Please don't take it personally. Just give your valuable opinion. If another thread already exists then let me know sothat I can lock it.
Note: If this post does not deserve this board then please suggest the correct board.
My personal opinion, it is not legit. Because:
1. When a Hero/Legendary member applies for a jr member and got accepted then the jr. member ranked person will lose their chance of acceptance.
2. When Hero/legendary member got jr. member rank and if ranked up then that positions people will lose their chance to be accepted. For example, if Sr. member ranked opened then previous accepted hero/legendary will get that position. In this case, sr. member is a loser for that hero/legendary member.
3. As payment of Jr. member is low so, when there is another project hero/legendary member will take that position. In that case, the position will open again and now bounty manager has to find out another person so many people will apply again.
So, I all-time there should have an issue if one position filled up by another positions people. Please don't take it personally. Just give your valuable opinion. If another thread already exists then let me know sothat I can lock it.
Note: If this post does not deserve this board then please suggest the correct board.
Jump to: