PS: There's this mysterious post which many believe not to be authentic from March 6, 2014 ("
I am not Dorian Nakamoto"). If we count this one, the price was at $642 one day later according to the same source. So we'd be talking about $737 million at that date.
Interesting. That would be consistent with my theory that Satoshi was CIA/NSA. In other words, the operative there created it, it got out of hand, so they pulled away and let the community take it over. If they felt they were making somebody's life miserable because somebody was falsely accused of being them, it would make sense that they would feel bad about that (or would be afraid of being sued over it) and pop their head up to correct the situation.
And it may look inauthentic because it was another aspect of the organization e.g. legal department that perhaps didn't use the same tradecraft.
For me, this mystery hinges on one thing that people seem to miss: why would anybody let $50 billion just sit there? Or in this case, $737 million? No individual on the planet is rich enough blow off that much money, and statistically you'd have to assume that Satoshi was just an ordinary worker somewhere that made a decent salary, not a Forbes List billionaire.
Another thing that doesn't add up here is that Satoshi apparently made
absolute zero on Bitcoin. Again, if he was just an "ordinary Joe" (or Jane) then you would think he'd at least sell $10k worth if only as a means of feeling good that his invention really worked.
But if he were CIA/NSA, he would not want to sell anything because it would be... a big mess with his superiors and his organization (and my theory is that now it's an even bigger mess that they don't know what to do about).
(I began my CIA/NSA theory here on bitcointalk half-joking, but... hmmm....).