How much will BTC be worth when it replaces what percentage of fiat?

Dr Bloggood

sr. member

Activity: 336

Merit: 250

Quote from: Zarathustra on January 15, 2014, 09:40:19 AM

Quote from: Dr Bloggood on January 14, 2014, 10:16:41 AM

Thanks for that post - now that's something to work with!

Quote from: MajikPiG on January 14, 2014, 09:41:06 AM

The Gross World Product (GWP) is currently around 80 trillion US$. (That's a US trillion, a British billion.)

Wouldn't the GWP be all the money the world economy turned over in a given period of time? How is that related to M2, M3 or whatever?

When you got some money on your account or under your mattress, it counts for the M's, but doesn't do anything, so doesn't count for the GWP.

Worldwide money (which is debt) is 200 Trillion.

With "money" defined as what (M2, M3,...)?

Source?

keithers

legendary

Activity: 1456

Merit: 1001

This is the land of wolves now & you're not a wolf

Bitcoin will never replace fiat. Fiat will always be used for a large number of transaction, Bitcoin and other cryptos can strive to be the best alternative, but there is no way for a virtual currency to replace a physical currency, when not everyone on the planet has an internet connection.

Zarathustra

legendary

Activity: 1162

Merit: 1004

Quote from: Dr Bloggood on January 14, 2014, 10:16:41 AM

Thanks for that post - now that's something to work with!

Quote from: MajikPiG on January 14, 2014, 09:41:06 AM

The Gross World Product (GWP) is currently around 80 trillion US$. (That's a US trillion, a British billion.)

Wouldn't the GWP be all the money the world economy turned over in a given period of time? How is that related to M2, M3 or whatever?

When you got some money on your account or under your mattress, it counts for the M's, but doesn't do anything, so doesn't count for the GWP.

Worldwide money (which is debt) is 200 Trillion.

mestar

sr. member

Activity: 407

Merit: 250

Quote from: Dr Bloggood on January 14, 2014, 03:29:32 PM

Quote from: mestar on January 14, 2014, 12:31:31 PM

I have estimated that if BTC hits 1 million dollars in the next 3 years, mining will be so profitable that miners can spend up to 3.6$ billion every day in electricity. So there will be billions of dollars worth of Bitcoins hitting the exchanges every day.

But there is always the same number of BTCs coming into existance every day, no matter what they are worth, right? So I don't see how spending more on mining brings more BTCs into existance.

"Billions of dollars worth of Bitcoins" in this case does not mean more bitcoins. If one Bitcoin is selling for 1 million, then daily 3600 Bitcoins becomes $3.6 billion.

mestar

sr. member

Activity: 407

Merit: 250

Quote from: porcupine87 on January 14, 2014, 12:34:51 PM

Exchanges? What exchanges? With being so expensive who would pay your super market, Amazon.com, your employees, your dentist, your mother with Bitcoin and only would receive Bitcoin. What exchanges?

More interessting would be, how much electricity would get wasted and how many hardware. Bitcoin would be much more secure than it would be necessary...

You got a point there. But, until you can pay your utility bills in Bitcoins, mining costs will push the price of Bitcoin down.

Dr Bloggood

sr. member

Activity: 336

Merit: 250

Quote from: pietje on January 14, 2014, 03:34:02 PM

Quote from: Dr Bloggood on January 14, 2014, 03:29:32 PM

Quote from: mestar on January 14, 2014, 12:31:31 PM

Quote from: Dr Bloggood on January 14, 2014, 09:27:04 AM

I have heard if BTC replaces all fiat money in the world, 1BTC would be worth approximately 1 million $ (I have also heard 2 million $, so maybe that 1 million is more on the lower side).

I have estimated that if BTC hits 1 million dollars in the next 3 years, mining will be so profitable that miners can spend up to 3.6$ billion every day in electricity. So there will be billions of dollars worth of Bitcoins hitting the exchanges every day.

But there is always the same number of BTCs coming into existance every day, no matter what they are worth, right? So I don't see how spending more on mining brings more BTCs into existance.

Yea true, actually it becomes smaller when block rewards half.
But as bitcoin value is 1 million, the bitcoins going into the market are maybe worthmore then now.

Ok, I see. That's obvious though, and they will do much less to the market than they would do now.

pietje

full member

Activity: 224

Merit: 100

Quote from: Dr Bloggood on January 14, 2014, 03:29:32 PM

Quote from: mestar on January 14, 2014, 12:31:31 PM

Quote from: Dr Bloggood on January 14, 2014, 09:27:04 AM

I have heard if BTC replaces all fiat money in the world, 1BTC would be worth approximately 1 million $ (I have also heard 2 million $, so maybe that 1 million is more on the lower side).

I have estimated that if BTC hits 1 million dollars in the next 3 years, mining will be so profitable that miners can spend up to 3.6$ billion every day in electricity. So there will be billions of dollars worth of Bitcoins hitting the exchanges every day.

But there is always the same number of BTCs coming into existance every day, no matter what they are worth, right? So I don't see how spending more on mining brings more BTCs into existance.

Yea true, actually it becomes smaller when block rewards half.
But as bitcoin value is 1 million, the bitcoins going into the market are maybe worthmore then now.

Dr Bloggood

sr. member

Activity: 336

Merit: 250

Quote from: mestar on January 14, 2014, 12:31:31 PM

Quote from: Dr Bloggood on January 14, 2014, 09:27:04 AM

I have heard if BTC replaces all fiat money in the world, 1BTC would be worth approximately 1 million $ (I have also heard 2 million $, so maybe that 1 million is more on the lower side).

I have estimated that if BTC hits 1 million dollars in the next 3 years, mining will be so profitable that miners can spend up to 3.6$ billion every day in electricity. So there will be billions of dollars worth of Bitcoins hitting the exchanges every day.

But there is always the same number of BTCs coming into existance every day, no matter what they are worth, right? So I don't see how spending more on mining brings more BTCs into existance.

allthingsluxury

legendary

Activity: 1540

Merit: 1029

I doubt anyone would be able to accurately predict this.

porcupine87

hero member

Activity: 546

Merit: 500

hm

Quote from: mestar on January 14, 2014, 12:31:31 PM

Quote from: Dr Bloggood on January 14, 2014, 09:27:04 AM

I have heard if BTC replaces all fiat money in the world, 1BTC would be worth approximately 1 million $ (I have also heard 2 million $, so maybe that 1 million is more on the lower side).

I have estimated that if BTC hits 1 million dollars in the next 3 years, mining will be so profitable that miners can spend up to 3.6$ billion every day in electricity. So there will be billions of dollars worth of Bitcoins hitting the exchanges every day.

Exchanges? What exchanges? With being so expensive who would pay your super market, Amazon.com, your employees, your dentist, your mother with Bitcoin and only would receive Bitcoin. What exchanges?

More interessting would be, how much electricity would get wasted and how many hardware. Bitcoin would be much more secure than it would be necessary...

mestar

sr. member

Activity: 407

Merit: 250

Quote from: Dr Bloggood on January 14, 2014, 09:27:04 AM

I have heard if BTC replaces all fiat money in the world, 1BTC would be worth approximately 1 million $ (I have also heard 2 million $, so maybe that 1 million is more on the lower side).

I have estimated that if BTC hits 1 million dollars in the next 3 years, mining will be so profitable that miners can spend up to 3.6$ billion every day in electricity. So there will be billions of dollars worth of Bitcoins hitting the exchanges every day.

porcupine87

hero member

Activity: 546

Merit: 500

hm

Quote from: MajikPiG on January 14, 2014, 10:47:31 AM

Okay, I found an estimate of world M3 at $75 trillion, which, if it's at all accurate, makes my numbers not horrifically far off.

ETA:
http://gizmodo.com/5995301/how-much-money-is-there-on-earth

Quote

For the narrowest definition, or what's called "M0", that includes only physical money, paper bills and metal coins that constitute currency. That figure is around 5 trillion dollars. The next step up is M1, which includes all the physical money, plus quickly accessed money like that in checking accounts, and comes in at $25 trillion. M2 includes M0 and M1, but also pulls in stuff like savings accounts and CDs under $100,000. That figure is around $60 trillion. And the last figure, the $75 trillion M3, is much more abstract and not often cited in official figures. It includes institutional money market funds, long term deposits, and other stuff rich people possess that can somehow be spent but confuses the rest of us.

ETA:
But actually, I think M1 or M2 is a better measure for this than M3.
Using M1: If M1 =~ $2.5e13, then, at 100% BTC, 1BTC =~ $1.2 million
Using M2: If M2 =~ $6e13, then, at 100% BTC, 1BTC =~ $2.85 million

The 21mio. bitcoins are the monetary base. It is "physical".
1. When I have 1Mio. btc and deposit it on a bank, M1 grew by 1mio. to 22mio., because I have 1mio. which I can withdraw all the time and the bank has 1mio. in theier physical power.
2. When I lend 1mio. btc to you and we make a contract that you pay me back 1mio. in one year, M1 stays the same, but M2 grew by 1mio.

So does it make sense to take the M0 number, the monetary base? Not really, because Bitcoin is not a money like we knew it. Maybe we need no banks in the future. Less lending, because no manipulating of the money supply. etc.

But this is all just hypothtical. I think it is possible to go to 100 000$ in terms of purchasing power of 1$ today. But that's it. And this number we reach only if everything works perfekt. Not only the state is a thread. Google etc. could come up with a better money. As so can do other cryptocurrencies.

Dr Bloggood

sr. member

Activity: 336

Merit: 250

Quote from: Mike@Coinswag on January 14, 2014, 11:23:25 AM

Rather than in $ terms, I think we need to look at it like this:

When/If BTC becomes 10,50,70,80, to 100% of all World currency, what is it's purchasing power?

I welcome the day that .000006 BTC pays a month's rent, or buys that new 50in LED tv you need.

But that's just a different way of calculating it, right?

We are just doing our calculations in terms of todays purchasing power.

Dr Bloggood

sr. member

Activity: 336

Merit: 250

Quote from: MajikPiG on January 14, 2014, 10:47:31 AM

Okay, I found an estimate of world M3 at $75 trillion, which, if it's at all accurate, makes my numbers not horrifically far off.

ETA:
http://gizmodo.com/5995301/how-much-money-is-there-on-earth

Quote

For the narrowest definition, or what's called "M0", that includes only physical money, paper bills and metal coins that constitute currency. That figure is around 5 trillion dollars. The next step up is M1, which includes all the physical money, plus quickly accessed money like that in checking accounts, and comes in at $25 trillion. M2 includes M0 and M1, but also pulls in stuff like savings accounts and CDs under $100,000. That figure is around $60 trillion. And the last figure, the $75 trillion M3, is much more abstract and not often cited in official figures. It includes institutional money market funds, long term deposits, and other stuff rich people possess that can somehow be spent but confuses the rest of us.

ETA:
But actually, I think M1 or M2 is a better measure for this than M3.
Using M1: If M1 =~ $2.5e13, then, at 100% BTC, 1BTC =~ $1.2 million
Using M2: If M2 =~ $6e13, then, at 100% BTC, 1BTC =~ $2.85 million

I remember reading somewhere about $75 trillion, but I'm not sure and don't remember if it was M2, M3 or whatever.

We need M3 IMO, your quote is describing it in a bit of a strange way. BTC can for sure substitute long term deposits, and what are money market funds, something like a pension fund or so (this might just be a language problem, my mother tongue isn't English)? In that case, it would be better to calculate without those funds.

I'm pretty sure though M1 is not enough, that one is really too narrow. M2 or M3.

Using M3: If M3 =~ $75 trillions, then, at 100% BTC, 1BTC =~ $3.57 million

EDIT: I guess something between M2 and M3 would be accurate (depending on what institutional money market funds exactly are and how much of M3 they actually make up..)

Dr Bloggood

sr. member

Activity: 336

Merit: 250

Quote from: zeetubes on January 14, 2014, 10:44:02 AM

I'm probably going to embarrass myself here because it's been a few years and I don't have a good web connection to research. I think m3 is the figure you want. Even though it's still lies, it shows all of the money floating around the system including printed money. Bernanke stopped releasing the m3 figures because they weren't relevant (what a b.s. fuck that guy is). You'll probably find that every day around $3T passes hands through the world's financial systems and that is the figure that btc is chasing. GDP is a meaningless measure which includes things like unsold houses and cars plus all that government spending. So the government proudly claims GDP is rising when all that happened was they started a new war, or gave more money to bail out the welfare banks. Checkout shadowstats for some excellent estimates.

I read you guys' reply after my post - I agree, M3 is what we want! World M3 should be a lot higher than 3 million though. GDP, as I initially suspected, is meaningless.

And yes, Shadowstats is awesome (I just got to it while doing my research - we probably researched simultaneously on the same pages, all of us...

).

Mike@Coinswag

newbie

Activity: 32

Merit: 0

Rather than in $ terms, I think we need to look at it like this:

When/If BTC becomes 10,50,70,80, to 100% of all World currency, what is it's purchasing power?

I welcome the day that .000006 BTC pays a month's rent, or buys that new 50in LED tv you need.

zeetubes

sr. member

Activity: 371

Merit: 250

Here's a clue. From today's headlines too.

' The Fed, which supervises U.S. bank holding companies, is among authorities from London to Washington probing whether traders shared information that may have let them manipulate prices in the $5.3 trillion-a-day foreign-exchange market to maximize their profits, said a person with direct knowledge of the matter, asking not to be named because it’s confidential. The central bank’s involvement in the probe hasn’t been previously reported.'

Dr Bloggood

sr. member

Activity: 336

Merit: 250

Quote from: MajikPiG on January 14, 2014, 10:34:03 AM

Quote from: Dr Bloggood on January 14, 2014, 10:16:41 AM

Thanks for that post - now that's something to work with!

Quote from: MajikPiG on January 14, 2014, 09:41:06 AM

The Gross World Product (GWP) is currently around 80 trillion US$. (That's a US trillion, a British billion.)

Wouldn't the GWP be all the money the world economy turned over in a given period of time? How is that related to M2, M3 or whatever?

When you got some money on your account or under your mattress, it counts for the M's, but doesn't do anything, so doesn't count for the GWP.

You're right. Monetary Base (MB) is probably the best bet to figure this out. MB of the US is supposedly $3,736,101,000,000. What about the world?

The first question is which one of the M's to take (M0, M1, M2, M3,M4).

I guess it should be either M2 or M3.

M0 and M1 would be too narrow, I'm pretty sure. So let's go with M3 (or maybe even M4), because this somewhat resembles the use of BTC and shows which part of the economy BTC could theoretically substitute.

I googled the world M3 for 20 minutes, I couldn't find it.

But $75 Trillion is what I remember having read somewhere as well - that is why initially I thought you were on the right track.

It's probably even higher than governments admit, with all the money printing (making 1BTC in our example worth more) - for example, the US government stopped reporting the M3 8 years ago.

MajikPiG

member

Activity: 84

Merit: 10

in doge we tryst

But even with that, I'm only finding statistics for the US. In order to answer the OP's original question, we need to know the value of the world's entire money supply.

ETA: Okay, I found an estimate of world M3 at $75 trillion, which, if it's at all accurate, makes my numbers not horrifically far off.

ETA:
http://gizmodo.com/5995301/how-much-money-is-there-on-earth

Quote

For the narrowest definition, or what's called "M0", that includes only physical money, paper bills and metal coins that constitute currency. That figure is around 5 trillion dollars. The next step up is M1, which includes all the physical money, plus quickly accessed money like that in checking accounts, and comes in at $25 trillion. M2 includes M0 and M1, but also pulls in stuff like savings accounts and CDs under $100,000. That figure is around $60 trillion. And the last figure, the $75 trillion M3, is much more abstract and not often cited in official figures. It includes institutional money market funds, long term deposits, and other stuff rich people possess that can somehow be spent but confuses the rest of us.

ETA:
But actually, I think M1 or M2 is a better measure for this than M3.
Using M1: If M1 =~ $2.5e13, then, at 100% BTC, 1BTC =~ $1.2 million
Using M2: If M2 =~ $6e13, then, at 100% BTC, 1BTC =~ $2.85 million

zeetubes

sr. member

Activity: 371

Merit: 250

I'm probably going to embarrass myself here because it's been a few years and I don't have a good web connection to research. I think m3 is the figure you want. Even though it's still lies, it shows all of the money floating around the system including printed money. Bernanke stopped releasing the m3 figures because they weren't relevant (what a b.s. fuck that guy is). You'll probably find that every day around $3T passes hands through the world's financial systems and that is the figure that btc is chasing. GDP is a meaningless measure which includes things like unsold houses and cars plus all that government spending. So the government proudly claims GDP is rising when all that happened was they started a new war, or gave more money to bail out the welfare banks. Checkout shadowstats for some excellent estimates.

Topic: How much will BTC be worth when it replaces what percentage of fiat? (Read 3053 times)