So as a community, what method of remuneration would you be happy with?
donations only.
Topic: how should coin developers be remunerated? - page 5. (Read 4687 times)
donations only.
0.125% hard coded to address that can be redeemed immediately
0.125% hard coded to address that can't be redeemed for at least 6 months after genesis block.
Anyone who says coin devs should not be vested in their coin seem to have no concept on how.... well.... anything works
Devs having a pump and dump mentality are a HUGE part of the problem. If they have an incentive to stick around, maybe they will.
0.125% hard coded to address that can't be redeemed for at least 6 months after genesis block.
Anyone who says coin devs should not be vested in their coin seem to have no concept on how.... well.... anything works
Devs having a pump and dump mentality are a HUGE part of the problem. If they have an incentive to stick around, maybe they will.
The community appears to have moved towards screaming scam every time they see the potential for a coin developer to make some money on a coin they created, released, and supported.
So as a community, what method of remuneration would you be happy with?
So as a community, what method of remuneration would you be happy with?
Its more there arent many actual developers in these coins
Maybe a system that doesn't reward dumping straight away. Some sort of thing like stock options, if possible.
Something that incentivises the devs to actually develop after the launch.
Something that incentivises the devs to actually develop after the launch.
None
~CfA~
~CfA~
The community appears to have moved towards screaming scam every time they see the potential for a coin developer to make some money on a coin they created, released, and supported.
So as a community, what method of remuneration would you be happy with?
So as a community, what method of remuneration would you be happy with?
Jump to: