If you are in the 10% of the richest you have a problem: You have something that everyone else would like to take from you. They cannot do this directly because the right to private property / ownership is normally granted and enforced.
So basically, what your saying is that the rich have a problem and
BTC solves this problem.
However, in a democracy, you run the very serious risk of people asking for laws that would force you to distribute wealth.
Nice finding out that the blockchain doesn't care about democracy and what a majority of hungry jackals vote for.
I always find it funny how people who claim to be bitcoiners and are saying how bitcoin is such a great thing are always finding fault in the current social order but ignoring that bitcoins do the same and stand for. My keys, my decisions, my money, NOT your business!
I don't think that distribution of wealth is a likely scenario in western countries. The problem ist that most rich people have their wealth invested in companies all around the world, so taking away ownership of a company or acquiring the company by the government wouldn't work well for a country.
<>
Nationalising industries and wealth of rich people is a very dangerous idea that could ruin the whole economy.
Common, let's try it again, I mean it has failed a hundred times in hundred countries already but maybe this time we will be lucky and ocne the planet align we will somehow not end all poor as all others did.