I guess this is their subtle way of telling the Winklevoss bros to fuck off
I didn't see their decision myself (and honestly, I'm not very interested in that either) so I have to take your word for it. It kinda looks that by few people they (the SEC) meant the twins themselves. Apart from Satoshi himself with his 1M bitcoins sitting idly in his wallet for over 7 years already, the Winklevoss seem to come second by the amount of bitcoins held in a single pocket. Thereby, the ones who Bitcoin will be most beneficial to are the brothers themselves, and they have been essentially brushed off by the commission