Topic: How to distinguish between good and bad projects (Read 16878 times)
the most effective way to identify serious projects is partnership, I don't know about you but I am certain that big partnerships is another good signal of how good a project is, I have watched few Asian projects with huge partnerships that turned success
This question might actually be more technical than it sounds. A crypto poacher might just be interested in projects that enriches him irrespective of standard quality. On the other hands, a true crypto evangelist may be really looking out for real crypto projects that are not largely profit oriented and drives adoption with its use cases. So you see, these set of individuals will have a yardstick for measuring good and bad projects.
NEW project... wants investment.. does not have internal capital to survive at least 2 years = bad project
Hello! No project and service gives a guarantee for someone else's project. They play by their own rules. And they can change them along the way. Therefore, everything remains as before. Everyone decides whether to trust the project or not.
Yes no project will say that I am good and no one will say I am bad but we will have to let out eyes open and make research about the project we are investing with. We should use Google or YouTube to get proper information about any new project that we start investing with. We can take good help from internet about getting knowledge related any project. 
I think there are a lot of projects which are real, good and has huge potential
No. Not at all.if we talk about new projects, then it is simply necessary to apply a minimal analysis of projects and after this analysis further, it is just a lottery game.
Then why even bother with even a minimal amount of analysis. You might as well just pick a random project and throw your money at it and then cry when they scam you. That's all the ico space is now and all it's ever been.The answer to op's question is to just avoid ico's altogether, because none of them are worth investing in and it's my opinion bounty hunters should stop helping them promote their projects because they're basically enabling scams.
I do my own research such as checking the roadmap, team or whitepaper. for the ico rating website is unreliable because all projects pay to get a good rating on that website
How can you quickly distinguish between good and bad projects and even being invincible in the bear market？
In fact I join an ICO Rating Project recently and now I am testing if the project do help to investors.
Our team has analyzed almost 3,000 blockchain projects.
The analysis dimensions include Exchange, Community, Sentiment, Code and Market.
This project began half a year ago and is currently in beta.
Contact me if you are interested and you can download it for free.
In fact I join an ICO Rating Project recently and now I am testing if the project do help to investors.
Our team has analyzed almost 3,000 blockchain projects.
The analysis dimensions include Exchange, Community, Sentiment, Code and Market.
This project began half a year ago and is currently in beta.
Contact me if you are interested and you can download it for free.
to be able to distinguish between good projects and bad projects in my opinion is very difficult to find, because so many bad projects today that make a very good design. and good projects have simple designs, so that many investors have been harmed by bad projects. and good projects have simple designs, so that many investors have been harmed by bad projects.
How can you quickly distinguish between good and bad projects and even being invincible in the bear market？
In fact I join an ICO Rating Project recently and now I am testing if the project do help to investors.
Our team has analyzed almost 3,000 blockchain projects.
The analysis dimensions include Exchange, Community, Sentiment, Code and Market.
This project began half a year ago and is currently in beta.
Contact me if you are interested and you can download it for free.
In fact I join an ICO Rating Project recently and now I am testing if the project do help to investors.
Our team has analyzed almost 3,000 blockchain projects.
The analysis dimensions include Exchange, Community, Sentiment, Code and Market.
This project began half a year ago and is currently in beta.
Contact me if you are interested and you can download it for free.
to be able to distinguish between good projects and bad projects in my opinion is very difficult to find, because so many bad projects today that make a very good design. and good projects have simple designs, so that many investors have been harmed by bad projects. and good projects have simple designs, so that many investors have been harmed by bad projects.
Just look at the project itself the whitepaper, the team and its purpose you will know if the project prospers or not. You will spot immediately if the ico or ieo is a good project if the team is composed of the one well know devs and if the project was advertised by well known cyber techs on this platform and if the DT of this forum is supporting of thaf said project
Not an assured thing and also its not right for you to rely with that DT feedbacks because not all would really be precisely able to detect which is scam or not.You cant spot out scams even just reading up a WP. or seeing its team because even scam ones nowadays are too really hard to be identified if you dont make in depth research everytime.
Currently there are many ways to distinguish between good and bad projects but to do this quickly is extremely difficult. Your way is great, I hope you can research and share better ways. thank you. 
If bad project is referring to those that are not potential ones but not frauds then in this case, there are two possibilities, either the project will give up soon or going to make future but needs some time. Investors can’t wait for long so they should first choose a potential project and try these ones too. If bad meant frauds and scams, then pointing them out is a plain task, the rewards will always be high. 
Its not that tough actually to decide whether a project will be a good one or just created to scam people. If the team has invested their money into the project like creating a good website with features or even offering services. The usecases of the project and its coin. If the coin has a real use case when the project comes out then we may say that the project is good.
I think there are a lot of projects which are real, good and has huge potential but due to very low interest by investors the project did not get the soft cap or hard cap and then the project extends its IEo or ICO and after due time again it not get the keen interest by investors and at last the project become scam. And the most affected by these projects are bounty hunters as they always do there best to promote the project but when they did not get any rewards then this was the most hurting situation.
there are still many real projects, but the concept they have is sometimes not good enough which ultimately makes them fail to get good results at sales and make them fail when starting the project because they do not have good funds. quite difficult for new people, and sometimes even experienced people can get caught up in fraudulent projects so the best way is to be careful when looking for projects, and don't forget to always look for complete information
Just look at the project itself the whitepaper, the team and its purpose you will know if the project prospers or not. You will spot immediately if the ico or ieo is a good project if the team is composed of the one well know devs and if the project was advertised by well known cyber techs on this platform and if the DT of this forum is supporting of thaf said project
How can you quickly distinguish between good and bad projects and even being invincible in the bear market？
In fact I join an ICO Rating Project recently and now I am testing if the project do help to investors.
Our team has analyzed almost 3,000 blockchain projects.
The analysis dimensions include Exchange, Community, Sentiment, Code and Market.
This project began half a year ago and is currently in beta.
Contact me if you are interested and you can download it for free.
In fact I join an ICO Rating Project recently and now I am testing if the project do help to investors.
Our team has analyzed almost 3,000 blockchain projects.
The analysis dimensions include Exchange, Community, Sentiment, Code and Market.
This project began half a year ago and is currently in beta.
Contact me if you are interested and you can download it for free.
It's going to sound trivial but when i see a bunch of glossy hi res images and a very graphical website that looks sorta sci-fi . These two thinks tell me this project puts more effort into "image" over a use case. If they do not have a working crypto use case or utility and all they have is the "image" of it. SCAM. Obviously... I look for fake team and whitepaper indicators. Also look for unrealistic project goals. Lets say a project is taking on manufacturing or some use case that requires large investment capital. That's a huge red flag. It's just not realistic. I look for coding based projects that a developer can achieve without large investment. Coding and time is their assets.I take a closer look. Basically i try to look for achievable goals. If a project is claiming all this obviously unrealistic goals= Scam.
Quote
How can you quickly distinguish between good and bad projects and even being invincible in the bear market？
It is not difficult to predict a successful or unsuccessful project. While the successful project manifests itself in all its forms, the failed project is unfortunately only engaged in constantly selling dreams for the future. In order to distinguish between successful and unsuccessful projects, it is sufficient to read whitepaper, to learn about the project team, to research about the project technology and the product of the project and to obtain information about the partner agreements of the project in the current or future periods. If a project meets every factor positively, it is certainly a successful project and worth investing in. I would also like to state that the most important factor among these factors is to learn about the project team. A good team comes up with a good product and a good project. A bad team comes up with only empty dreams and a lazy project.
I think there are a lot of projects which are real, good and has huge potential but due to very low interest by investors the project did not get the soft cap or hard cap and then the project extends its IEo or ICO and after due time again it not get the keen interest by investors and at last the project become scam. And the most affected by these projects are bounty hunters as they always do there best to promote the project but when they did not get any rewards then this was the most hurting situation.
Do not trust any ICO rating sites, they are paid for good ratings.
I know that you have heard many times about DYOR, but it is really the only way how to realize which project is good and bad. Focus mainly on team previous experiences and on partnerships. Also it is very important to invest only in projects that already have working product.
for new projects, of course ranking is a priority to attract investors, but manipulation takes place within it, and ultimately project performance is not as expected. the most important thing to judge is the team's experience in the project. the team that has often been successful in handling projects, will certainly choose good projects to work on, indirectly they have analyzed a project I know that you have heard many times about DYOR, but it is really the only way how to realize which project is good and bad. Focus mainly on team previous experiences and on partnerships. Also it is very important to invest only in projects that already have working product.
developer might defines of one on decision as appealing plan as distributing risks and resource and more with cooperation to work on collaborative action gives on extensive as might with the chance as delivering the better returns on work of the manage as the service reference of offers for public audience from indonesia as our work with the DOGEM project might gives with the better offers for pupils to comply with tasks of online communication with parties of the selection.
Today we barely see projects that make it only the limelight most projects turn into scam. The only way you can determine wether the projec is good or bad is proper research. You can read their project proposal or whitepaper but good whitepaper does not necessarily mean that the project is going to stand out, you can check Team's Profiles as well this one is very crucial because they are the ones that will be running behind the success of the project. Credible and high profile(Good Background can make a difference).
Hello! No project and service gives a guarantee for someone else's project. They play by their own rules. And they can change them along the way. Therefore, everything remains as before. Everyone decides whether to trust the project or not.
Jump to: