if ico already run, evaluate only use result ico selling
if ico not yet run, you can read project, whitepaper, dev team and campaign manager
Topic: How to evaluate potential ICO projects? - page 12. (Read 1504 times)
Before I evaluate the ICO project, the first thing I do is look at the project's website and see which of the project participants. And an irreplaceable thing is to find out about the bitcointalk forum to find out what people are saying about this project.
Yes, investing in ICO projects involves high risks. It's very difficult to select a good project from an ordinary scum. When choosing a project, it is first of all necessary to pay attention to the team, white paper and the relevance of the idea.
If you are an investor - the risk is part of your life, it is impossible to invest with 100% confidence in success. But in any case, there is always a chance to reduce these risks, and at least to be more confident in this issue, this is what helps the things you wrote about, it is a pity that the project team is not always possible to determine their honesty, and even being very, very relevant, the project suddenly for everyone can be a trap, so to speak.
Yes, investing in ICO projects involves high risks. It's very difficult to select a good project from an ordinary scum. When choosing a project, it is first of all necessary to pay attention to the team, white paper and the relevance of the idea.
If you are an investor - the risk is part of your life, it is impossible to invest with 100% confidence in success. But in any case, there is always a chance to reduce these risks, and at least to be more confident in this issue, this is what helps the things you wrote about, it is a pity that the project team is not always possible to determine their honesty, and even being very, very relevant, the project suddenly for everyone can be a trap, so to speak. Before you take part in ico, you need to look at the team, pratnikov, idea, reasonably assess whether they can collect their minimum, look at the reviews
That's right, in other words, it is necessary to fully analyze the project before entering into it, and to direct all forces to it. I agree with you on this issue.
To be honest new ICOs would not be determined by the fund they collect from Donator or sponsor if they will live long or they will be successful, so one point to be consider is the member involve in the project, if they were member that has been a member before in past ICOs that has been successful until today.
Yes, investing in ICO projects involves high risks. It's very difficult to select a good project from an ordinary scum. When choosing a project, it is first of all necessary to pay attention to the team, white paper and the relevance of the idea.
Before you take part in ico, you need to look at the team, pratnikov, idea, reasonably assess whether they can collect their minimum, look at the reviews
If ICO give a lot of information about it - it's good. If the workteam have good reputation - it's very good. As example - Komodo from developers BitcoinDark or ArcBlock ICO, when you can see strong team also.
I think that the main criterion is the speed and quality of the feedback. If the bounty team is working slow, for a long time does not answer, manager not calculating stakes - it will be bad project very often.As I known, ICO is a kind of risky investment. Similar to the IPO which is the form of invite for capital investment, but when buying IPO, investors can research the information about the company they invested, find out about official finance reports and be protected by law when joining. In contrast, ICO projects are often rather ambiguous and unprotected by government so the risk is so high for investors.
So how to evaluate a potential ICO project, look forward to receiving comments from you
So how to evaluate a potential ICO project, look forward to receiving comments from you
Almost all the reviews and posts are biased. The information is all out there, take your time and go through the whitepaper. Look at the team and their history. Local laws and product roadmap etc. Use your best judgement.
When evaluating an ICO we should review their white paper to know the product, the mission and its objective. There you will know also the team behind the project. You can also opt to scan their marketing strategies and see it gets the interest of the crowd. From all those points you will have a glimpse if the project have a potential in the market.
Read all the social networks, is there any interest of people, read biographies of the team and advisers.
It's hard to stick on that one, why? because a lot of paid reviewers are doing some shilled paid reviews these days and there are also some that are paid to destroy the reputation of an ICO having a good potential in the future, i suggest looking for the community support and reading their whitepaper ourselves will be better compared to these reviews. Background check is a no brainer so we should always check the background of the team behind. 
Evaluating potential ICO will be easy if you already know what the project is all about, what's its pupose and what market it intend to enter. The market needs will tell if that ICO will become successful since the current market situation is the reason behind the development of such project. Investors can also tell if that project will likely to succeed or not so you can also check their feedback.
This is an important thing to consider first on where market it would enter. I have seen lots of projects are focusing on the same market or thing to progress which i do see that it would flood and turns out on having less interest and most likely they will fail.I do rather choose up into newer and unique projects which dont really have much competition into the field of progress which higher chance on seeing a potential would be always there. 
the important points for me: there is a working prototype of the product, a competent whitepaper, the company is registered, the founders and advisors are people with a trustworthy reputation, the team – professionals with experience in creating successful projects.
Evaluating potential ICO will be easy if you already know what the project is all about, what's its pupose and what market it intend to enter. The market needs will tell if that ICO will become successful since the current market situation is the reason behind the development of such project. Investors can also tell if that project will likely to succeed or not so you can also check their feedback.
I'm trying to get answers to questions like - What's new will create a project? How unique will it be? Who are the developers? I also study the road map, the interest of users to the project is also very important
Read all the social networks, is there any interest of people, read biographies of the team and advisers.
Potential ICO project can be evaluated by looking at its number of participants, positive comments on the project, the ICO must have a whitepaper and it's roadmp, check it's website if there is any and ask about the ICO in their telegram group. You should also ask to any experts ICO hunters also so that you will get more tips from them.
Intuition is not important , and competent analysis of the project team . Review of all documents . Ico lot , and worthy projects a little . So be careful
Evaluating ICOs can be full-time job. There are many factors to be considered. You should start off with reading the whitepaper and begin your analysis from there. 
Evaluating the growth of an ico is possible through the study of the entire project. For this one needs to spend long time and even after this one cannot conclude that it is successful. Same as bitcoin, ico's too are unpredictable. To some extent considering the development and promoting team can predict the potential.
Jump to: