Topic: How to evaluate potential ICO projects? - page 9. (Read 1506 times)
When I want to evaluate any potential ICO, i Join their telegram community and read their whitepaper.
So that from the set of start-ups the investor could choose the right project, he should evaluate his strengths and weaknesses, the potential for growth and possible problems. After, it`s worth considering the investment strategy.
There are two main ways: to sell tokens immediately after entering the stock exchanges or store them in anticipation of future development of the company and a multiple growth of the token. Both strategies will work if during the analysis the investor realized that the ICO is worthwhile, and the project has great potential. I highly recommend to take a look at this project https://goo.gl/7RC9x8
There are two main ways: to sell tokens immediately after entering the stock exchanges or store them in anticipation of future development of the company and a multiple growth of the token. Both strategies will work if during the analysis the investor realized that the ICO is worthwhile, and the project has great potential. I highly recommend to take a look at this project https://goo.gl/7RC9x8
I always have my own way to evaluate ICO, I often see the background of their team and the openness of their project to everyone can be likened to the website and in the website should tell all about the project from whitepaper, road map, team, and even purpose in create the project.
Studying a website is just the first point. Next, you need to make sure that the team is real. There were times when the team was fictional. It's good that the forum helps to quickly find out.Website can be manipulated by scam dev's they can create beautiful site and fake stats on it that's why I can't point that one as basis. Try to see how big their supporters is and reach for their telegram and social media pages aswell read their whitepaper then you can find that the project is good to join on. Proper evaluating is truly good in ICO industry since ICO platforms has been used for scamming these days.
I always have my own way to evaluate ICO, I often see the background of their team and the openness of their project to everyone can be likened to the website and in the website should tell all about the project from whitepaper, road map, team, and even purpose in create the project.
Studying a website is just the first point. Next, you need to make sure that the team is real. There were times when the team was fictional. It's good that the forum helps to quickly find out.
Now a days there are many ico boost company such as tokenmarket,bravenewcoin,etc ,which host the ico for your company and team can just focus on their project.so at least their supported ico are safe and generated good funding as they only support legit ico.so to be on safer side you can invest in their supported ico or do your own research before investing.
I think everyone has their own ICO rating. No one is the same, but I think it also has some general criteria for evaluation. In particular, we often judge by the following factors: politics, law, communication (this is also an important factor), on the concern of the community for that ICO. Beside, we should also see Consider the ICO project website as much as possible so that we can accurately assess the potential of an ICO project.
The thing you needed to do is to read the whitepaper placed by the dev and try to understand on what is the project all about and what plans do they have on the future since for this you may find out that dev dead serious for his project. And you can also try to reach up their social media pages,telegram groups and reddit to see if their community is huge since if you can find out on how many communities/people are supporting them you may find out on what would be the outcome of their project.
The ICO got fame since many companies who do this gain more success that's why you can see some new ones popping up and trying their luck to earn with it.
The ICO got fame since many companies who do this gain more success that's why you can see some new ones popping up and trying their luck to earn with it.
Totally agree with you. The level of development of the project determines the number of followers. Could also share where best to monitor new projects? Are there any specialized sites?
I see that potentially have ICO coins that not too much nor too little because so that later results can be stable. Besides the great ICO is also carried out by a team of experienced too so don't be vain.
It's very difficult to predict, We can not just look at whitepaper, website, and roadmap. Looking at the background of the team and their products on the market is another assessment of the ICO project. Do they have a team capable of developing a project? and Are their products already accepted by the market? I believe that is an additional question as our assessment of the ICO project.
I always have my own way to evaluate ICO, I often see the background of their team and the openness of their project to everyone can be likened to the website and in the website should tell all about the project from whitepaper, road map, team, and even purpose in create the project.
As I known, ICO is a kind of risky investment. Similar to the IPO which is the form of invite for capital investment, but when buying IPO, investors can research the information about the company they invested, find out about official finance reports and be protected by law when joining. In contrast, ICO projects are often rather ambiguous and unprotected by government so the risk is so high for investors.
So how to evaluate a potential ICO project, look forward to receiving comments from you
So how to evaluate a potential ICO project, look forward to receiving comments from you
well the main criteria is of course the idea of the project. what a problem they want to solve. the more global the problem the more interesting the project. the second criterion is the development team. if the team is very strong and professional, the probability that they will still solve this problem is high, so there are even more reasons to participate in this ICO. Then the Finance rates are going. What is the soft cap, what is hard cap, if hard cap large it is likely that when are get to the auction price of the token will drop, so they are need to hardcap was small. Basically for me these are the main indicators.
It is very difficult to assess the prospects of ICO projects. Now many ICO projects are falling apart and not going to the stock exchange. I choose projects on the following criteria: the idea's perspective, the composition of the team.
They should have a team that have long experienced in their respective fields and they should have a working product already . Don't gamble your investments on those that are just going to work on their product after ICO because there is a very a high chance that it's garbage.
'As I known, ICO is a kind of risky investment. Similar to the IPO which is the form of invite for capital investment, but when buying IPO, investors can research the information about the company they invested, find out about official finance reports and be protected by law when joining. In contrast, ICO projects are often rather ambiguous and unprotected by government so the risk is so high for investors.
So how to evaluate a potential ICO project, look forward to receiving comments from you'.
Like most have already said do your research with the whitepaper, social media and website. I personally only invest in companies that are offering something that's needed or is fresh and original.
So how to evaluate a potential ICO project, look forward to receiving comments from you'.
Like most have already said do your research with the whitepaper, social media and website. I personally only invest in companies that are offering something that's needed or is fresh and original.
As I known, ICO is a kind of risky investment. Similar to the IPO which is the form of invite for capital investment, but when buying IPO, investors can research the information about the company they invested, find out about official finance reports and be protected by law when joining. In contrast, ICO projects are often rather ambiguous and unprotected by government so the risk is so high for investors.
So how to evaluate a potential ICO project, look forward to receiving comments from you
The truth is there is not so much difference between investing in both of those projects, what you need to do is to research the developers, are they really who they say they are? Do they have to experience they say they have? Is the project realistic? are the goals achievable? How many competitors do they have? You need positive answers to all of those questions if you don't have them then it may be a good idea to not invest in the project. So how to evaluate a potential ICO project, look forward to receiving comments from you
One thing that I usually look for is the support of the Advisors whether there are quite influential people listed on their team like if there are someone form other team that is known to the users in the forum. And also whether the team exposes their faces on youtube channel because that is when we see how much serious they are with the project they are doing.
It is important that these famous people confirm their attitude to the project, and not just were listed as advisers on the site
One thing that I usually look for is the support of the Advisors whether there are quite influential people listed on their team like if there are someone form other team that is known to the users in the forum. And also whether the team exposes their faces on youtube channel because that is when we see how much serious they are with the project they are doing.
Before participate in any ICO i evaluate it according to the following principle: 1) product 2)softcap, hardcap 3)team and advisors (checking their profiles in social media)4) bonuses - for me looks suspicious, if there are the bonuses more that 35-40% and no locked period for these coins, this is a big project load 4) Have any developments taken place prior to ICO or not 5) community - is there telegram group, active or not, support.
yes a serious point in checking if it takes part in the conference, and whether working with investors offline, this will greatly reduce the likelihood of falling into the trap.
in my view ico projects are risky due to a recent scam one of the major points i see in selecting an ico project if the particular ico attend Blockchain conference then we will select as potential ico to invest the reason is the potential transparency and serious behind the project will be revealed in blockchain conference platform
Jump to: