I'm an active participant in quora. Mostly I'm engaged in cryptocurrency discussion in Bengali. My purpose is simply to fight against FUD, misinformation. I have been doing this actively for long time now. I have engaged in debates in quora.
For the last few years, I'm trying to have a debate about Bitcoin with Mohammad Ghoni who was a Professor in a private university of Bangladesh. He claims himself as a economic analyst.
However, his negativity against Bitcoin is totally stupid. In fact, it seems he is biased when talking about Bitcoin or other cryptocurrency. He talks nonsense as if he doesn't know anything about Bitcoin. He is spreading wrong information about Bitcoin in quora. It's simple, when you don't know anything perfectly and you want to talk about that, you will only generate some stupid text.
I tried to engage with him in his responses. I'm ready to have a debate with him. The problem is he doesn't reply when someone wants to talk against his stupid opinion. He simply put answer on quora and then leave. I have replied in many of his answer in quora but never got a reply.
Now, I'm getting more concerned because he is spreading negativity in most of the questions. What can I do? Is there anything legal step someone can take, any foundation working on such issue? Or how can I invite him for a debate? I can simply put him on ignore but I'm also concerned about people getting wrong message. That's why I'm thinking something different.
If I understand you correctly, then you can make an open challenge to this opponent's debate on social networks. He will be obliged to answer, but judging by his behavior, he is unlikely to do so.
The problem with any dispute is that if there are only two people in it and there are no those who are watching from the outside, then the truth will not be achieved in such a dispute. The thing is that we need observers from the outside. After all, if the debater who evades answers, turns to emotions, personalities, or starts arguing about tastes (it's useless to argue about them since it's individual) will always try to get away from the truth. And if there are outside observers, they will be able to protest his actions as not leading to the resolution of the dispute.