Topic: How to harrass billionaires? what's your ideas before choping their heads off? (Read 487 times)

the matrix is all around us

I don't know if you are confusing me with someone that would chop anyones head off or condone violent acts toward other life forms of any kind. Except those who tried to take away my billions when I make them.

I simply posted that he was correct in some things that he said since you seemed too closed minded to give them sensible consideration.

It is best to remain open minded in all things if you expect to find the optimal insight.

I think you watch too much sci fi movies, and take them too seriously.
Movies that are funded by billionaires, by the way.... This beautiful people's Hollywood speech is so pedantic...

Go on, good luck chopping off billionaire heads, with that beautiful Hollywood matrix progressive speech.

 I hope you live what you believe is better.

I just prefer to live "what is", instead of "what if".



Ah, and satoshi is now a billionaire. You can start your justice journey by chopping off bitcoin from your life then, don't you think?
Or maybe you can propose a fork to delete satoshi coins, as he is too rich. You could call it Bitcoin Matrix

Off topic - lol - that you introduced to the thread. This is the kind of madness one has to deal with on this forum.

Like say for instance.... I now claim you should not be able to post here because your mother is too ugly.

You come back claiming your mothers sexual appeal is of no real gauge or indication of your post quality. You post a pic of some model you randomly found on the internet (that I have seen before and that have mated with)

I then say you are off topic my faux son.

The rest of your post is open to all kinds of interpretation and could spawn books of debate depending on your personal views.

Just a little hint and something for you to mull over.

1. what if the billionaires allow you just enough to content your small mind instead of starving you into revolution and prefer your status quo to what you know you could be reduced to if you decided to think a little deeper and tried to inspire others of your type into complaining.

2. what if you are unknowing seeking to be enslaved because you subconsciously know that the matrix is best for your type. therefore constant access to others reinforcing the status quo is comforting and essential. time alone and not hooked into your smartphone can cause you emotional discomfort and a sense that all is not well in the wider world. Giving your mind time to disengage from others and stimuli fed to you via your phone could enlighten you in other ways. Make you more creative. Then again if you are reading these gems via your smartphone that negates a lot of what I have just said. It's all so .....

Not that I believe either of those 2 things are true in a concrete form, but your statements are open to books of debate and endless too and fro until you all end up speculating on things that are above the current human level of understanding.

I have nothing against rewarding success and innovation. However the world is kind of like a monopoly game there perhaps need to be reset button or have a cap  on how much you can be allowed to own regardless of your deserved success maybe a billion. Then again that may not work well either and how to implement it . I guess we just have to wait and see how it all works out.  Somethings are too complex to believe you can offer anything of use to  improve things long term.

Still - I could change my views after my first billion . I will update and let you know at a later time.

What he says is true? That billionaire pays me to protect them?  Or that  I seek enslavement because i have a smartphone? Or Doo I seek enslavement because i recognized the value of smartphone invention?


What you said is also off topic.

Merit system has it flaws, but it's better than the activity system.
And a merit requirement would  certainly block those kind of users who are rude and offending other people when they have no clue ehat they are talking about.

A lot of what he says is actually true.

Also merit means little here. Most of the super high merit accounts are just a bunch of back slapping circle jerks in meta. Most of them (not all) have never made any big difference in crypto or ever been first to stop/highlight a scam. There would have to be strict criteria for giving merit that was objectively verifiable for it to mean anything. I've seen people give a 50 merit for just a standard post they just happened to identify with. Or 100's of merit for developing some merit analysis tools.

If you critically analyse just simple things with a lot of them the wheels seem to come off. Many of them have pulled total 180's on their previous POV  to the point where i had believed their accounts had been hacked or sold.

I read peoples post history through and see what big/ really useful things they have done in crypto before looking at merit. I look at how accurate their predicitions have been. I don't give much weight to merit at all for quality posters.

It has one small use and that is to weed out the noob that mostly just want to spam and shill.. or perhaps bots.

I wish OP realize it but if you look at the responses her made on the replies it's obvious that s/he is not open to have a decent conversation about it. S/he has issue with riches and that's final LOL

May be OP needs to find someone who will be on the same page like him.

If you really think "billionaires" are the problem then you lost the plot.

and me for useless post without any substance... it's simple, you know that what I wrote is problematic...

Comments like this make me think about an earned merit requirement to post in the ivory tower ...

Quoted for reference...

you are soooooo brain dead... please, those billionaires can't afford better PR or it's simply that you are doing deliberatly the opposite of what they pay you for?

let's look at both your example, here, on this forum? couldn't you cite to better closed sourced system example? no you couldn't...

and worst is your lack of knowledge of history... you are such a sucker.... xerox htc... I know for you that is nothing, past... non event, in your fake reality bubble.

he fucking gave you nothing, you fucking bough it even if it was overpriced and the margins are insane on the product and that all your data (audio, locations, all things you input in) will be harvested by them.

I find fun to see guys seek enslavement... the fear to be able to determine independently your destiny and rather than face the unavoidable death, seek the confort of slave master...

the plantation mindset well explained by candace owen...

most bought apple products because they saw that girls were too stupid and obsessed to maximize their sexual strategy to learn how to use real software and hardware and so the little conformist muppet did what was expected from them, they conform, they chose their imac and other shit with an emptied apple logo...

and worst you don't address my issue :

bezos 120'000'000'000 in the bank
potus salary 400'000...

you don't see a problem here? you are too dumbfounded and chose those 2 examples to hang them?

then you don't see the problem

1 bag of cocaine = years in jail
running a pedo island = 13 months

how can you be so dishonnest? you know the truth, making this dishonnest choice, removed your humanity to me, meaning, you are really a disposable source of biomass and nutrients... really... just a thing to be disposed at the right place for "recycling"... nothing else.

and that will not change.

and that's why they hate trump so much, what can they offer him he doesn't have? something they can't offer him, MAGA !

The thing is that many of those billionaires create things that are very useful.

Bill gates created windows. You can say whatever you want about it, but 1000000 engineers couldn't make windows alone.

What about iPhone? The first smartphone. This invention changed the decade.
I am sure you have one smartphone.

Do you think that 1000 or 10000 engineers would invent one without Steve Jobs? Even if he didn't made it, he knew how to invest in a good idea and give resources to that idea and the people able to achieve it

 employees following orders blindly will receive less money. They are not making the big decisions or suffering any kind of risk.

Do you think it is unfair to make people like Steve Jobs a billionaire? I think that making him a billionaire was not a problem at all. He gave us all smartphones, which changed the way we all live.

Nobody is forced to use a smartphone. They are sold for a fair price  and you are not forced to buy. And everyone buys it because it is useful.

Those inventions all com from countries which support billionaires, not from countries that Harrass them.

What you are saying has been tried many times. It results in more unemployment and poverty. The billionaires just move elsewhere.

Think...

POTUS SALARY = 400'000$

BEZOS WEALTH = 120'000'000'000 $

How many years can Bezos pay 10x the salary of the potus and not even see it in his net asset value? it's just noise for him....

so you see the problem?

I don't have a problem with the successful independent financial crowd or those working diligently to make a better world or simply allocate asset effienciently...

but look at the math problem...

bezos is worth how many years of potus salary? you see the problem?

I see it. you can fucking deny as much as you want.

How do you explain the pedo island in little st. james? again epstein is a billionaire, most of his clients were at least billionaires... and what happen in term of justice? look it's simple... and you get caught with a little baglet of cocaine and it's years in jail... run a pedo island and its 13 months...

you see the fuckery?

if you don't it's because you sold your time for money from them.... your choice, your call, your destiny.

It's not juvenile to stand up to bourgeoisie, they extract all the wealth that workers create.  Without the workers they have no wealth.  We have more then enough resources to go around for everyone but the upper class gobbles everything up.

I agree that money doesn't buy happiness but having no money can cause extreme stress and suicidal thoughts.

People will still create and strive for greatness without a financial motivation.  Even cavemen created art.

I'm not jealous in the slightest, material possessions bring no joy to my life and they end up taking up more of my time which is the most valuable thing we have.

Lol! Is this supposed to be “serious” discussion?

A forum where most people want to get rich by earning/buying/trading bitcoins or shitcoins, and we are talking about chopping billionaires’ heads off?

So, when bitcoin reaches $100,000 or $1 million, are we going to chop some heads off members of this forum? I think we could chop some already. Look at the crypto casino owners who are members of the forum and were early adopters.

In The Millionaire Next Door and Everyday Millionaires (upcoming) it is shown that 90% of people in the USA who became millionaires didn’t inherit a penny or what they inherited was unsubstantial for them becoming millionaires. They were people who saved, avoided debt, and started investing at an early age. Save, invest, reinvest. Wash, rinse, repeat. A billionaire knows that and does the same.

I take it that OP’s ideal society is the one where we are all equal. Equally poor. Apart from the politicians running it and their relatives.

With all due respect, that's a pretty juvenile statement.  Who do you think would suffer the most if such a thing were even possible?  How do you think the average would support himself if he stopped working?  In any case, you can ponder that hypothetical if you want, but it's just not going to happen.

I've never been opposed to someone being rich just because I'm not.  Even if they inherited all their wealth and did nothing to earn it.  I've seen how miserable rich people can be, and money definitely does not buy happiness.  It's such a hackneyed statement, but it's one that's true.

Also, would we want to live in a world where super-wealthy people don't exist?  What would we strive for?  What we'd end up with is a society much like communist Russia was when I was a child.  People would still have to have something to lust after, and it'd probably be power.  I'm sure that world wouldn't be pretty. 

Despising wealth and the people who have it just smacks of jealousy.  I have no doubt that most of the complainers would jump at the chance to be super-wealthy if they could, and then they'd have the exact opposite opinion of billionaires.

Seems like you lost your mind to have a decent conversation LOL I see hate inside you against those who have money. Anyway, it does not matter. Good luck with your harassment plan or whatever you are planning.

you don't understand asset allocations... smith work was just to justify the loot of the commons by the establishment at the time... look it up, it's in your history book, just not well explained.


What the fuck is this crap... at least you could provide something convincing.

so are they one or not? if you believe they have one mindset, they are one, no more individuals but a hive...

now the real question to move forward is the problem that in a democratic system once the oligarchy takes over, they will only foster their interests and provide scraps to clam the plebs...

this is, I think, one of the key pillar of modern china, to be able to kill a billionaire who has gone ashtray without any noise, consideration or fear, like the poorest or the richest, become a death penalty case and see it applied. no discrimination, equality before the law... and the executed kill list proves my words.

betray > die. rich, poor, small, big, fat, skiny... no difference.

then there is the problem f the political influence... a democracy goal was 1 man = 1 vote. the problem is that there is no fair media in the us, everything is biased, lying, deceiving, and only fostering an agenda, even alexjones, when it comes to falling for their agendas all will silence their problems, making them unaddressable.

again yes, there is censorship in china, but the problem get solved, so that the enemies can't use the medias like in the us to foster chaos and make the simplest problem unsolvable.

I know it's a war mindset, a war not against the people of china, but against it's enemies, and if some nationals fall in the traps of the enemies, so be it... and they will talk.

finally what I would like to know is the political position of all american billionaires on all issues... making the entire democratic part of the republic dead, as the goal is to find one or a few that agree with my position and rally around them... aka like pooling in mining, which is super sad, but is there another solution, when those corrupt raping treasonous billionaire can just pay the apparatus to get immunity like epstein or have black files?

in china, epstein would have been executed with his little buddies a few days after his guilty plea... then it's foreign friends would have tried to hide and would have been killed... that's life, that's a nation, and this march forward...

and for the fuckers wordwide who think they will oppose it? dig your graves, they will be filled faster than you could realize... and make them big, for now your offsprings got lucky... but why not raise? you will fold, you don't even what it takes to go after silverstein and epstein and you wanna with China? ahahaha... dreamers.

I was not talking about all those stuffs, I was talking about the mindset of the riches and the mindset of your claim. A class can not be labeled bad just because you do not understand their mindset. Having money and having power is two different things. A billionaire does not mean that he has to have power and the same way all powerful personals are not billionaires. You were talking about those powerful (abusive) riches and I was talking about those billionaires who worked hard and built the empire from the scratch. There is a significant difference.

Would you say that the poors are not corrupted? They do not crime abuse their power (whatever the scale they have)? There are good an bad people in every class. Just because you encountered with a bad person does not mean that the entire society is bad.

This is exactly that we need. A truly rich guy will give you the respect you deserve, they know how to value others time.

In 1776 Adam Smith proposed in his book the wealth of nations an idea that shows this is not a problem at all.

He showed that the the more money rich people make when running their business it's better for the whole society.

The more money they earn , the more people they can hire to work for them, to make more money.

Attacking billionaires or millionaires is not how a nation will become richier. You have to work with them.

you really don't understand fiat? bail outs? moral hazard? read ben bernanke, he did some speech on it. Do you understand what is meant by regulatory capture?

maybe learn about GINI coefficient? What constitute a rich society?


how are you gonna buy food? shelter? pay propriety taxes?

now the thing is rather to be on defensive with their constant attacks, why not reverse it?

ben laden too was a billionaire by the way...

I find this lack of creativity very worrying.

Not a single fun idea?

it's so sad.

for example do they employ illegals for gardening, pool, cooking? do they pay taxes on their use of prostitutes, sorry, escorts?