I have a suggestion for you, if you want to find a signature campaign, you can open thread https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/new-the-table-of-new-bounties-3307997
lots of information about the campaign.
Topic: How to pick best signature campaign (Read 7054 times)
As for me it is not easy. hard to predict the fate of the project and whether it will be promising. I just choose the project at my own discretion and by site evaluation
If you want to choose the best signature campaign for you, then you should go to the ICO review site to find out about the project. Then came the speed of selling ICO and finally the project team
What criteria do you guys use to pick your signature campaigns. With some of them lasting 2-3 months it seems like a critical decision and I'm not quite sure how to go about it. With all the scams out there I am fearful of picking a junker which not only hurts me but the people looking at my promotions. I would like to have one picked out for when I switch over to Jr Member.
In order to join a signature campaign you should pick or choose the campaign that contains the quality of a good team, have an excellent idea and have an extra ordinary knowledge . 
I suggest you follow this topic : https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=615953.0? there You would find the best of them that pay with Bitcoin , But don't expect much with a Jr rank .
usually the rule is very difficult, the member must have merit and post must be 20 posts.for me this is very risky to make spam post, and my account will be marked. I am still learning to make good and useful posts. and does not have merit.
For current situation in the market the key is the project itself because nothing and no one will compensate you if project will collect 0$.
I suggest you follow this topic : https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=615953.0? there You would find the best of them that pay with Bitcoin , But don't expect much with a Jr rank .
Choose the campaigns based on the managers because most of the reputed manager will do enough research about that project before they were taking that bounty to manage and nowadays no bounties are worth to join for two reason wither a good project overwhelming with number of participants which makes the rewards to be very less or the remaining projects providing worthless tokens.
What criteria do you guys use to pick your signature campaigns. With some of them lasting 2-3 months it seems like a critical decision and I'm not quite sure how to go about it. With all the scams out there I am fearful of picking a junker which not only hurts me but the people looking at my promotions. I would like to have one picked out for when I switch over to Jr Member.
My idea about in choosing the best signature was I always look first the allocation budget for the bounty percentage for the project.
Checking their website as well, knowing how much each per token, once it launch after their project done then read their whitepaper also
to find out how it will goes while the project is running.
What criteria do you guys use to pick your signature campaigns. With some of them lasting 2-3 months it seems like a critical decision and I'm not quite sure how to go about it. With all the scams out there I am fearful of picking a junker which not only hurts me but the people looking at my promotions. I would like to have one picked out for when I switch over to Jr Member.
Honestly for me was basing on their ICO sold token..Looks great if they finished in 2 months which the hardcap will reached early. What criteria do you guys use to pick your signature campaigns. With some of them lasting 2-3 months it seems like a critical decision and I'm not quite sure how to go about it. With all the scams out there I am fearful of picking a junker which not only hurts me but the people looking at my promotions. I would like to have one picked out for when I switch over to Jr Member.
In the first place I look at the whitepaper to find out if there project is good or not, through this we can able to see how good the project is, the road map flow of it also. Then, search the count of the community investors in the project as well too. Then, check the bounty allocation if it is high or low so you will know that you will be compensate in a long run.
It is very hard to find, and if you are lucky to find it, it’s not a fact that there will be a small number of participants. Since the better the project, the more participants take part in the bounty.
It is is not so hard to find the best signature campaign. You can find it by looking out their team members or their website. You might ask them questions about their development or how does their platform work. And on their answers, you can judge them that the signature is worthy or not.
What criteria do you guys use to pick your signature campaigns. With some of them lasting 2-3 months it seems like a critical decision and I'm not quite sure how to go about it. With all the scams out there I am fearful of picking a junker which not only hurts me but the people looking at my promotions. I would like to have one picked out for when I switch over to Jr Member.
Just choose a good project, have huge investors or partnerships and an active these critea could make the ICO successful and the bounty reward would be worthy. You will just have to read carefully about the project
I am more likely to read the website and see the team from the project in what field. the last one I saw was from a bounty manager with good faith.
Before selecting a signature campaign you have to do research on the project. You have to check the bounty manager and along with this you have to check the team behind the project. And also you can read the whitepaper of the project to get a deep understanding of the project. after all doing all these things you can get the idea about the signature campaign.
I made the white book as a reference, I looked at the project road map, the target of the funds to be collected. then the team behind the project.
I try to choose the bounty of the company where there to participate less than 3 weeks trying to get not very much but that wasn't a Scam
To select signature programs I use these criteria. Firstly, it should be a really worthwhile project, with a finished product, with at least a soft cap already assembled. Secondly, I try to take the program, which left to work not so long, a month or less. In the third I look at the amount of funds allocated to the company, as well as the number of participants. Of course, ideally, when they allocate a lot of money and at the same time there are very few participants. Then it turns out the maximum earnings. There is one more criterion, but it comes across very rarely, this is when a token or a project coin is already being traded on exchanges. These are the main criteria that I use when choosing a signature program.
It all depends on your account. If you are a beginner, then you need to look for the longest possible company and approach this scrupulously enough. Also, it is desirable that the reward does not depend on the length of stay in the company, and the number of messages and it should be unlimited.
Jump to: