Topic: How to pick best signature campaign - page 17. (Read 7056 times)
There are many criteria to consider when choosing a good project . I would choose a signature campaign with a creative project, good backing and larger interest from investors, also higher stakes .
You can choose by seeing the enthusiasm of the community about the campaign. You can also see ratings from rating sites. Because that will give you more trust. The rest is only the factor of income that is in you. If you are lucky, you will get a good project.
You can find pretty number of signature campaign in bounty section. But you should choose right one. Because not every project is good. Hence choose good legit project...
important to me are the bounty manager, rating and the team behind the ico / bountie. rhese three factors are already a good foundation stone. of course, the rest has to fit.
First of all, look and learn the crypto project itself, look at how many tokens are allocated to the company's bounty, and how many percentages are allocated to the signature company.
It seems to me that first of all it is necessary to study the information about the company, because even if the company's total Pool Bounty is higher and the percentage for signing the company is also large, this does not guarantee good earnings, especially if the project is of little prospect.
First of all, look and learn the crypto project itself, look at how many tokens are allocated to the company's bounty, and how many percentages are allocated to the signature company.
at the present time it is very hard to choose the best signature campaign. The time has changed, the market has changed too. You can try to avoid 100% of the scam, but choosing the best of the best is unlikely to work out.
When I am choosing signature campaign, I always research and ask about it. I am reading their project carefully and sometimes I am talking with one of the member about their project. In that way you can be sure that you got good signature campaign. If you won't research about the campaign that interest you, there will be a high chance that you might get scam.
Those coins behind which there is a really useful product are good. They have a future and they will constantly develop. And coins without the product will not survive for a long time.
Currently everything depends on the projects success, other factors are not so important, because if project can't collect money all tokens are wortheless.
Well atleast 1 of money you have to spend,spend Analytics,where some promised interest payments for the bounty,how many people are already involved in the signature,and then more importantly what the project team what they have already implemented projects,its experience in this field,EICTA for the idea of the project,whether it populaarne in the crypto world?!
first of all you should check the project of that bounty campaign like you are investing in. if you are 100% satisfied by the project and its team you can check bounty distribution amount and participant quantity. if they are ok you can join.
I just started with this so maybe it turns out I'm completely wrong here... but what I looked for was the following:
*Good project idea
*Enough people intrested in the project
*Good team
*Good bounty manager
*Enough funds distrubuted to bounty hunters
So basicly the same stuff I look for in an ICO except for the bounty part.
I also take my time to look out for all these when I am looking for a good signature campaign to join because I believe these are some of the important things to note before joining the group for you nt to end up in a scam project. *Good project idea
*Enough people intrested in the project
*Good team
*Good bounty manager
*Enough funds distrubuted to bounty hunters
So basicly the same stuff I look for in an ICO except for the bounty part.
What criteria do you guys use to pick your signature campaigns. With some of them lasting 2-3 months it seems like a critical decision and I'm not quite sure how to go about it. With all the scams out there I am fearful of picking a junker which not only hurts me but the people looking at my promotions. I would like to have one picked out for when I switch over to Jr Member.
If you want to choose best signature campaign then you need to check every project carefully. You need to check it is real or fake bounty. You need to check their team members and you need to check how many people are interested on your selected projects. Then you can choose that bounty for signature. 
Picking the best signature campaigns I always first check who is the campaign managers of the projects and their previous work. Check their team member and verified the projects their holdings.
Actually I do not have much experience in choosing a signature campaign. But I like to participate in short-term signature campaigns. To be able to get bonuses quickly. I most bored to wait for the market when participating in a campaign I have to wait for months to get money.
This is a difficult task. For example, I trust the signature only to a verified team, in which I am sure. It seems to me that the most important thing is to be crooked in the fact that the project will successfully pass the ICO and will be on stock exchanges without 95% of the cost of tokens
copper member
Activity: 98
Merit: 0
GIGZI -INDEPENDENT WEALTH MANAGEMENT www.gigzi.com
Whenever picking the best signature campaign always choose or consider a reputable manager who is well known in this forum. Also, do your own research regarding the project, the people and their vision.
see in light of ICO from the abundance fundamentally from the whitepaper that is an essential rule. Notwithstanding this see likewise the designer group in the abundance so as to decide the best abundance that could deliver. simplest at that point look through the main director experienced abundance and take after an abundance he runs. in any case, this isn't an assurance and is only a little tip as it were.
There is not much thing I check before joining or picking best signature campaigns. First off, I have experienced some rejections and scammed projects and that made me more cautious in choosing campaigns. Since then, before joining, I am making routine check first for who so ever initiated the bounty. I am not saying I do not trust new members but at least we have to give more credit to those veterans who where here since it started and know way better than us. Then researching the Initial Currency Offering project, their backgrounds and status as a company. We could not really predict which best campaign we could join with but at least we could always review it and rely on our instinct sometime.
Yeah right, but sometime even studying it and observing the project there will always be a time that unexpected happenings can happen and a particular project turns scam at the end.
Jump to: