Topic: How to pick best signature campaign - page 20. (Read 7043 times)
I prefer a signature campaign that provides an easy job like post 10 / week and their project has reached softcap. this will make me excited to do my bounty work.
View the project team, its goals and plans. The reality set for the collection of capital. What has already been realized, what are the developments or partners. It is possible that the project outside of the crypto currency already existed, this gives confidence in reliability.
even the manager, the leading project on the forum - is important.
even the manager, the leading project on the forum - is important.
I think you should search for bounty campaigns published on the forum by high-rank users with a good reputation, there is a big variety of bounties so it may be a hard task to pick one so just let yourself go at first for the reputation.
Firstly, you need to analyze ICO project, answer to this questions:
1) Why this ico is not scam?
2) Is the problem relevant?
3) How does the token solve these problems?
etc, also pay attention to Team, Roadmap, Token Distribution and proceed of funds, whitepaper, website and of course bounty program (signature campaign)
1) Why this ico is not scam?
2) Is the problem relevant?
3) How does the token solve these problems?
etc, also pay attention to Team, Roadmap, Token Distribution and proceed of funds, whitepaper, website and of course bounty program (signature campaign)
To participate in the signature campaign,it is important to first become a junior member. those who are interested in the novice signature campaign, the have to increase their account rank. you should find a sophisticated company that gives you more profits in less time.
What criteria do you guys use to pick your signature campaigns. With some of them lasting 2-3 months it seems like a critical decision and I'm not quite sure how to go about it. With all the scams out there I am fearful of picking a junker which not only hurts me but the people looking at my promotions. I would like to have one picked out for when I switch over to Jr Member.
It is so simple to pick a best signature campaign, just read in specific signature campaign thread and if you see one is paying more than another, apply for it immediately.There are also some differences in terms of each campaign which must be kept in mind.
It is necessary to monitor the company about at least 100,and see where the signature of at least 30-40% percent yield,then how many people are there involved,what Kanda developers,what is the idea,and even implemented,all this will give you a huge analysis and understanding of what to expect
What criteria do you guys use to pick your signature campaigns. With some of them lasting 2-3 months it seems like a critical decision and I'm not quite sure how to go about it. With all the scams out there I am fearful of picking a junker which not only hurts me but the people looking at my promotions. I would like to have one picked out for when I switch over to Jr Member.
there are different kinds of style to choose for the best signature, but as long as you can find a legit one, its a good project, you can look for their public information that has been distributed to the community and see for yourself if its legit or not. you can also see their platform if it has a future, or it might hook the interests of possible investors.
In order to choose a compass subscription you need to make anassez of the bailey for you, then check the porters and after that join and fulfill the tasks of the company, since a lot depends on the analysis, whether the company is successful or not, I personally choose the company signed by the project Amaziks, he good and reliable all advise
Above all else, you have to focus on the group. Known powerful individuals in the ICO group, soak huge speculators, genuine interpersonal organization profiles, entrenched correspondence, videoconferences, by and large straightforwardness of the venture - this gives an extra preferred standpoint. The cash put resources into the venture. Make certain to focus on the measure of reward.
First of all, I want to look at the project to see if it is what is needed and solve the problem. Then I'll look at the team and the reward manager who is working. I knew that if the bounty manager was good, it would probably be a very good project, or at least half decent. I also checked the duration and how much bonuses I had raised and whether I could get the bonnet at least. I check now, because I usually don't check it out.
It so hard to find a good and best signature. But If you want a best signature campaign, of course you have to check the project itself if it is good and productive, the bounty managers with a high rank and the participants as well, because the small numbers of participants the bigger stakes we will received. And we consider also the time of the campaign if how long will it takes by checking all at the white paper.
If you're talking about ETH, then it will increase (this is my opinion). I looked through and was surprised that recently it is gaining momentum, in comparison with others. 
What criteria do you guys use to pick your signature campaigns. With some of them lasting 2-3 months it seems like a critical decision and I'm not quite sure how to go about it. With all the scams out there I am fearful of picking a junker which not only hurts me but the people looking at my promotions. I would like to have one picked out for when I switch over to Jr Member.
If you want the signature campaign that really sure pay, join a signature campaign that the ICO already reach softcap. It means they will pay all the bounties, especially if the presale or private sale sold out all the tokens. It's a good sign, join a signature campaign that lasting 2-3months is really long though, that's why we need to be smart when choose a signcamp.
First of all, I look at the number of tokens and their cost allocated to the signature company. If the bounty goes more than two months, I try not to go.
I experienced that the most important factor is your luck, and the manager is the best and the project is worthwhile and the team is amazing, and in the end nothing ... And vice versa you will take three weeks in the subscription company and earn more than two months.
I always try to choose the project as carefully as possible to participate in it and for me one of the main indicators is the number of participants.
Pick a crusade base on the supervisor, there are loads of chief that is genuine on the grounds that they name has been exceptionally utilize and ensured. I believe that on the off chance that you need to locate a decent mark battle, you should first locate a decent reward chief, at that point you will ponder the group of the undertaking precisely. You can checking bitcointalk string, whitepaper, The Hard top and delicate top focus of the ICO
It seems to me, but only this rule works, the fewer people who take part in the bounty, the more you earn. And of course the crypto project itself should not be scammers.
I have learned that the initial factor to consider in choosing a signature campaign is the manager. A campaign being managed by a bounty manager with a high rank and has a good portfolio of successful projects increases our chance of being rewarded. There is a long list of popular bounty managers (which you can search on) in this forum which you can make as reference in making your campaign choices.
Jump to: