Topic: How to pick best signature campaign - page 36. (Read 7043 times)
To pick the best signature campaign. You should have a a research on what ICO you want. Read their whutepaper and road map. What are the vision and goals of their protect. Also who is the teams behind of this project. Search also who is the bounty manager and her background.
What criteria do you guys use to pick your signature campaigns. With some of them lasting 2-3 months it seems like a critical decision and I'm not quite sure how to go about it. With all the scams out there I am fearful of picking a junker which not only hurts me but the people looking at my promotions. I would like to have one picked out for when I switch over to Jr Member.
First make sure it is a legitimate campaign.
Check to see how long it lasts. My biggest mistake with signature campaigns is taking part in those that last wayyyy too long. A good time frame is 2 months maximum.
Actually they have so many ways on how to choose or pick a best signature campaign. And some of them are now telling to those person in here so just read and learn on how to find a best signature campaign.
1) Check the total paid amount, and see the amount of participants
- You don't want a bounty that pay too less, or a bounty that pay good but too much participants because that would lower down your average reward
2) Check if project is genuine and good to go in the future
- You wanted to prevent scam project because if one project end up scam, the bounty token you get will be worth = Nothing
- You don't want a bounty that pay too less, or a bounty that pay good but too much participants because that would lower down your average reward
2) Check if project is genuine and good to go in the future
- You wanted to prevent scam project because if one project end up scam, the bounty token you get will be worth = Nothing
If I wanna choose the which signature campaign to join, I will probably look at the aspect from the rules and the token allocation for the campaign, bessides that i will also look into the campaign manager to seek whether is it reliable or not.
To pick the best signature campaign, I will consider:
1. Manager campaign
2. Rules of posting per week/during ICO
3. Token allocation for the Signature campaign
4. Softcap reached for the ICO project
and More factors during analyzing the ICO.
Mostly I will focus on the campaign manager, a good and reputable campaign manager, he will always be concerned, actively managing the project because that determines a lot of prestige, especially if a scam campaign and he does not realize it, his image will collapse and people will almost never participate in the campaigns he manages. Next I will seek comments and assessment of the community for the project, instead of attention to the elements that you say, it is more helpful when the community is people who never want to project scam 1. Manager campaign
2. Rules of posting per week/during ICO
3. Token allocation for the Signature campaign
4. Softcap reached for the ICO project
and More factors during analyzing the ICO.
What criteria do you guys use to pick your signature campaigns. With some of them lasting 2-3 months it seems like a critical decision and I'm not quite sure how to go about it. With all the scams out there I am fearful of picking a junker which not only hurts me but the people looking at my promotions. I would like to have one picked out for when I switch over to Jr Member.
i always check for the teams integrity if they are in good status and have networks like big company partners that is willing to trust the team. if that certain company is trusting this project so do i.
There are a lot of things to consider in order to pick the best signature campaign. Some prefer to see who is the manager first the they visit the company website and read the whitepaper and check the profiles of the company member. Now take a look at the budget allocated and the number of stakes being given. If that is all ok to you then that is the right campaign to join.
It will be very good to communicate with the organizers of the project. This will show you 100% of the project's prospects.
One of the really useful things that I have found for myself is to join those projects which are already going on for a week or two because you can already see the project in the process, did they count the stakes properly, etc.
There are different ways or methods of choosing your signature campaigns.
But choosing the best signature campaigns requires lots of research, patience and enlightenment about the project.
But choosing the best signature campaigns requires lots of research, patience and enlightenment about the project.
To pick the best signature campaign, I will consider:
1. Manager campaign
2. Rules of posting per week/during ICO
3. Token allocation for the Signature campaign
4. Softcap reached for the ICO project
and More factors during analyzing the ICO.
1. Manager campaign
2. Rules of posting per week/during ICO
3. Token allocation for the Signature campaign
4. Softcap reached for the ICO project
and More factors during analyzing the ICO.
What criteria do you guys use to pick your signature campaigns. With some of them lasting 2-3 months it seems like a critical decision and I'm not quite sure how to go about it. With all the scams out there I am fearful of picking a junker which not only hurts me but the people looking at my promotions. I would like to have one picked out for when I switch over to Jr Member.
It is really hard to choose when we haven't still had lots of information about projects which are having campaign. There are many project and campaign are created everyday. what's good, what's bad?? It's really headache, because normally, one signature campaign usually lasts for 1-3 months. It will take a lot of time if you choose wrong
In my case, I am considering the popularity of the project as a whole when choosing a bounty to participate with because it would reflect to the campaigns within, including signature campaign. I am also checking the difference of the stakes per week depending on the rank of the participants. So to make it short, participants have their own basis.
the first thing I look at is the bounty Manager. there are managers with a good reputation. it is advisable to choose a bounty of just such managers. in this case, the risk of scamming bounty is minimized. but even an experienced Manager does not give a 100% guarantee of success. you should analyze the project yourself before you join.
There are many ways to decide if the project is good or not, but there are some important points you should learn. website, project team, Manager, and reward .. all that is very decisive. but it is also not a guarantee, because investors also contribute to the success of a Cryptocurrency project.
Look for one with a high chance of selling a decent amount of tokens is the most important thing as most of the bounties tend to base their rewards on the amount of tokens that they sell.
That's a really tough question! Various factors affect bountys success, I always take in account managers and the very project itself, and the popularity amongst hunters as well, I should say.
I think you need to understand, that this ICO project offers good project (respectively in finances or consumer goods services), has strong team and big investors/advisors supporting it, so it will not look like a scam project.
choosing signature campaign most of the time im looking for the token allocated budget, the team behind it, how they transparent to investors and participants, the purpose of the project and to know the capacity that maybe it can reached the hardcap when they selling their tokens.
Jump to: