Topic: How to pick best signature campaign - page 34. (Read 7057 times)
I would state that the timetable isn't important on the choice that you are going to make. Putting resources into ICO accompanies numerous variables to be viewed as like the ICO venture, the group organization, its objectives, its guide. its ann, and its objective market. I generally look onto these components previously I join an ico and it helped me well on the grounds that these elements decides the achievement of the ico consequently it will bring you more benefit. You can simply join an ICO whenever yet you cannot figure out which will succeed.
The best bounty company is the signature, the one in which there are very few participants, I do not care about the company signature, where there are a lot of participants, since very little money will turn out to be earned.
I am primarily interested in the project which conducts its ICO. If the project is good and the team is good, then I take part in the bounty of the company. You can also follow bounty managers. There are managers who have long held the bounty of the company and quite successfully.
I usually choose project from icobench and I always check ann, team and road map it. it's a lot of fraud but it's risk we remain patient and spirit that's the key to success
There must be an interesting idea, a good website, a strong team, an understandable white paper. But it still depends on luck. A lot of scammers know how to properly mask their scam.
to do this, you need to thoroughly study the project, its team, idea, compare plans with implementation and so on. just a good criterion is a reliable Manager who leads the company. there are also a lot of site with ICO ratings , in which you can also see the rating of the project and compare with all the data studied
In my experience, there is no such thing as best every bounty campaign has its own pros and cons so we can't really tell which is the best. You should pick which signature campaign is legit because whatever you do you will encounter a bounty which will not compensate for all your efforts and time. You should be checking their white paper of they have a legit and realistic plan for maintaining the platform to deliver excellent service to the clients.
to be involved in signature campaign, it's similar to investment in ICO, you have to know what's the project will offer, the team behind it and i don't think by following bounty managers you will find the keys for the best campaign
I figure you should read the whitepaper at that point rate it without anyone else's input at that point choose on the off chance that you will join their mark crusade yet for me this battle isn't the best for us who have low positions, this battle is only an extra stakes from different crusades you have joined.
If I join a campaign from the start, the main thing I check after the viability of the project is the proportion for signature, the cap number of participants and duration. But if I am joining at d middle, I look into the number of people on the spreadsheet and those rejected to determine how much I can earn from the campaign. That's what I did in d Konios campaign.
I generally pick abundance signature extends that are overseen by incredible chiefs. surely understood administrators are effective in overseeing numerous ventures. (I'm generally intrigued by picking venture from sylon , in spite of the fact that the dispersion of his coins is moderately long)
After the campaigns where there are too many participants, earn big money is so hard. If you have not collected a lot of money, the amount of rewards drops so much and you have wasted your time. the campaign manager, the amount of money collected and the number of participants are the most important criteria 
First of all i look at bounty campaign's budget. Then i analyze the project and if i think it's good enough, i register in it)
I would advise you not to evaluate the payments from the company, because you can promise a lot and not pay anything.
You can look to the team and whitepaper, or some user that have been in a good signature's before
The fact that it is better to choose the third option of your advice, because it is better to focus on the person who is better versed in choosing the signature of the company. The study of the team and the technical document will not give you anything, because you need to have a sufficient knowledge base for this.
You can look to the team and whitepaper, or some user that have been in a good signature's before
i think u should check to campain's team, and project potential
Firstly, you need to be a Jr.member to participate in most signature campaign, Secondly, it is necessary to analyze the company. See how many pools they allocate that offer, number of participants in the project and then, analyzing everything,only then you can understand how much promising project is this.
What criteria do you guys use to pick your signature campaigns. With some of them lasting 2-3 months it seems like a critical decision and I'm not quite sure how to go about it. With all the scams out there I am fearful of picking a junker which not only hurts me but the people looking at my promotions. I would like to have one picked out for when I switch over to Jr Member.
First of all, I am looking on project, the team behind it, what support it gets, amount of tokens they giving away. It is not that hard to find decent Bounty, just do not bite overdoable goals and do not be overhelmed by sweet speeches of high rewards and you will be fine.
There are many options of choosing signature campaign.First of all,you need to know about the project and read the details which is related to ICO.Then follow their instructions which mentioned in thread and do this.By following this,you can join a signature campaign
Jump to: