Topic: How to pick best signature campaign - page 44. (Read 7043 times)
First of all you should make your own research on the current project and after take a look at the bounty pool especially for the signature, if its arooun 20% of the total bounty pool and there are not so much participants, pick it
I look at various factors. First of all, I look at the project team, the country of the project, the general level of interest and ICO assessments of catalogs
Picking best signature campaign is major if you don't want to waste time on doomed projects. I'll suggest you follow advice from experts here
To pick a best bounty program you should visit their website and think clearly if they have real uses in the future and how they will help the real data businesses by using blockchain this is for a quality project but if you wish to join on big bounties then try to compute the price allocation of each bounties.
What criteria do you guys use to pick your signature campaigns. With some of them lasting 2-3 months it seems like a critical decision and I'm not quite sure how to go about it. With all the scams out there I am fearful of picking a junker which not only hurts me but the people looking at my promotions. I would like to have one picked out for when I switch over to Jr Member.
Me when will follow the bounty campaign always ensure the number of participants, because if the participants a lot then bounty thus has the potential for great success. And do not forget to always ensure the number of communities in the telegram, and the reputation of the team.
Do your due research about the project you intend to participate in. What's the use of spending one or two months working for a project that is not valuable? Research the team members and project's viability.
Also be sure that there are not many participants because the total reward you will get will reduce if many people are participating in the same campaign.
Also be sure that there are not many participants because the total reward you will get will reduce if many people are participating in the same campaign.
What criteria do you guys use to pick your signature campaigns. With some of them lasting 2-3 months it seems like a critical decision and I'm not quite sure how to go about it. With all the scams out there I am fearful of picking a junker which not only hurts me but the people looking at my promotions. I would like to have one picked out for when I switch over to Jr Member.
i pick a campaign base on the manager, there are lots of manager that is legit because they name has been very use and protected.i also base it on their sponsors, if i see legit sponsors. i usually see it as a legit ICO too
I look for the signature on the website icodrops, there are many good and top projects with rating and comments on it. I have takin signature from this website for 3 months the and i am very happy, still any skam did not get.
What criteria do you guys use to pick your signature campaigns. With some of them lasting 2-3 months it seems like a critical decision and I'm not quite sure how to go about it. With all the scams out there I am fearful of picking a junker which not only hurts me but the people looking at my promotions. I would like to have one picked out for when I switch over to Jr Member.
see if the project has a long term goal, see also if its product has a good use and if it will be worth it. read their platform and decide for yourself if it is worth it for your work.
This is my only second signature campaign, in one an a half year time and my criteria for choosing the current one was reading the white paper. When I realized the project is huge, with great idea and great team in it, I have decided to participate in it, without any doubts and now it's been nearly 20 weeks of work, still 2 month to go, I am looking forward for the project to succeed! Wish me luck
These are the characteristic that I am searching to pick the best signature their team members, road maps, website, white paper campaign managers and other projects that he handled. Check the potential of the token that they should be given as payments.
In my opinion, you need to spend a lot of time and analysis of the project, if you are satisfied with the project and you understand that this is not a Scam, I would advise you to pay attention to how many people involved and what payments, what budget. To understand how much you get.
Of course, analyzing the project is always a necessity, it will help us understand the project more accurately, from which we can make the decision to join or give up, however, that is not all, we should remember that scammers are always smarter and know how to deceive us. We can not just consider the project in a way that is too subjective, so as you say, we should observe more about the community, the number of participants and the evaluation, they will provide the reliability of the project, and the last thing we need to care about is the manager, a reputable manager will bring safety and prevent any danger from the project to us
I think that if you want to find a good signature campaign, you should first find a good reward manager, then you will study the team of the project carefully.
What criteria do you guys use to pick your signature campaigns. With some of them lasting 2-3 months it seems like a critical decision and I'm not quite sure how to go about it. With all the scams out there I am fearful of picking a junker which not only hurts me but the people looking at my promotions. I would like to have one picked out for when I switch over to Jr Member.
You need to read the white paper first of thw project, check also how credible it and those people behind that project thw if you think that it ia a good project, check rules and regulations, the distribution of shares and how many participants. IN participants you can't really do anything in it as everyday there were participants who werw joining the bounty.
In my opinion, you need to spend a lot of time and analysis of the project, if you are satisfied with the project and you understand that this is not a Scam, I would advise you to pay attention to how many people involved and what payments, what budget. To understand how much you get.
You've got to analyze multiple factors like bounty pool, signature pool, number of participants, bonus structure, collection progress, bounty manager, stakes proportion ( in some bounties member gains 2 stakes and full member 3, in others member gains 2 stakes and full member 4, so you have to estimate what will be more beneficial for your rank)
To date, no one can be sure whether the project is a promising project or not, now with well-known fraud project managers, but I am also guided by managers and look at the table, how many high-ranking participants accept their signature.
actually, the first thing before joining in the signature campaign is the allocation of funds for the signature campaign, that's what I think
but preferably, if want to join in the signature campaign should check whitepaper first, because the team documenting what their goals, vision, and income or bounty models are in there
but preferably, if want to join in the signature campaign should check whitepaper first, because the team documenting what their goals, vision, and income or bounty models are in there
if I personally how to pick the best signature campaign is to see first the allocation of the signature campaign (at least 25%), then after that I see the sales from ICO, if I feel successful then I will participate in the signature campaign.
How to pick best signature?? Just get the jr.member to join signature campaign and you get join in signature campaign just be loyal and active always sa the moderator of the signature will accept you in spread sheet !!
Jump to: