The first thing is that Team of the project. If they project don’t have proper or experienced team mates then there are chances that project may get dumbbed on way. Project owners are looks trusted and experienced you can check their linkedin profile. For other team info you can find details on their website.
The second thing is Idea of the project. If you don’t have a unique idea or you are cloning someone else’s work then people are not going to join you. To know about the project you need to visit their whitepaper most of the bounty companies are writing about their project in the whitepaper.
Bounty campaign is the third factor which you need to analyze before joining any bounty. The things which you need to analyse is that who is managing campaign, campaign should be managed in a proper way.
If any campaigns official website or social media pages are not updating then it’s not worth to join that type of sig campaign of such bounty.
Don't forget to also check the percentage of stakes allotted to that SIG.
Topic: How to pick best signature campaign - page 53. (Read 7043 times)
First I suggest you read the projects Whitepaper and get the aim and purpose of the project to know of its a sound project or just a joke.. Check the community how active it is.. After this two steps make a little enquiry form community members and follow your heart
I choose signature campaign based on the bounty manager. There are many experienced bounty managers like tokensuite and amazix. I always pay close attention to their bounty.
I think how to choose a good or good signature campaign, there is an advertisement and the campaign manager has a trust, that's what I believe in a trustworthy, or a good campaign.
It is very difficult to find a good Signature campaign now. I follow such criteria as the idea of the project itself, Bounty manager, funds allocation and the number of participants.
I just joined the first signatures are genesis, and even then only 2 minggu, I think signatur requires extensive knowledge about the world about all things related to the virtual world, but it takes patience, persistence and thoroughness.
my friend's experience was a signature for 9 weeks and finally he got a satisfactory reply.
do not forget to look at the team, partners and projects of the signatures we follow
my friend's experience was a signature for 9 weeks and finally he got a satisfactory reply.
do not forget to look at the team, partners and projects of the signatures we follow
What criteria do you guys use to pick your signature campaigns. With some of them lasting 2-3 months it seems like a critical decision and I'm not quite sure how to go about it. With all the scams out there I am fearful of picking a junker which not only hurts me but the people looking at my promotions. I would like to have one picked out for when I switch over to Jr Member.
I pick the best signature campaign with the best bounty manager, Good reputation of bounty manager in managing the bounty will lead to the succesful project
I know you don't want to end to a campaign that will scam you and take your efforts without giving you a pay.
Check out the experience of the team behind it and also check their social activities . By social activities I mean how they respond to reasonable questions put forward by experienced members of the forum.
I will do judgment according to the heat of the project, if a project's followers enough, so I'm sure I can make money from the ICO project, this is my sole purpose.
Several criteria in addition to the documents submitted by the team are authoritative campaign managers for reward, and the risk of not getting tokens after the ICO is significantly less. These managers have been here for many years, they know which project will succeed or which of them is going to fail at the end. In order not to spoil your reputation, a competent and well-known manager will not take a deliberately dubious project.
I think that if you want to find a good signature campaign, you should first find a good reward manager, then you will study the team of the project carefully.
Beforing joining - bounty pool, max cap and min cap for rewards calculations, timeline, project concept, viability.
During campaign - ICO STATUS, you aint get anything if the ICO fails, there are cases where it burns the supply to appreciate the tokens but you have to take notes.
Other than that there is nothing much to be done except waiting after your effort, countless time bounty would be delayed and you have accept it
During campaign - ICO STATUS, you aint get anything if the ICO fails, there are cases where it burns the supply to appreciate the tokens but you have to take notes.
Other than that there is nothing much to be done except waiting after your effort, countless time bounty would be delayed and you have accept it
I just started with this so maybe it turns out I'm completely wrong here... but what I looked for was the following:
*Good project idea
*Enough people intrested in the project
*Good team
*Good bounty manager
*Enough funds distrubuted to bounty hunters
So basicly the same stuff I look for in an ICO except for the bounty part.
ALl I agree. Join bounty is the same as join ICO. Participate in ICo needs skill to predict to coin to make profit. When you invest in weak team and project, you may loose your money. Strong team and great project will be benefit for investors to earn profit from the rise of the price in the market. *Good project idea
*Enough people intrested in the project
*Good team
*Good bounty manager
*Enough funds distrubuted to bounty hunters
So basicly the same stuff I look for in an ICO except for the bounty part.
for the first one i will see the bounty manager, then i will check the team that is behind the project, the allocation for bounty and how many participants joined
I thinks is depends to popolarity of signature and the members of the ICO is active the signature campagn is possible to success.
For me, i always pick signature campaign that is more percentage for bounty campaigns. Also, I used to pick who bounty manager is well known.
yeah you have a point . but first i think you must review the platform first together with the profile of the team. it will be a big help for everyone to know it first. there are so many campaigna over there that offers a large amount of percentage that will be distributed to the signature campaign but then , they will not give the exact amount. so better to be sure.
For me, i always pick signature campaign that is more percentage for bounty campaigns. Also, I used to pick who bounty manager is well known.
Consider the managing team, rewards and the participants number.
Bounty manager is important for me. And if the project had successful pre-sale before the campaign that would be good option for me.
I also often check pre-sales projects before the campaign, and I also often check the team, web, managers. so that the project that I follow does not fail.Yes I agree, bounty manager is one of the indicators of a good ICO project. Equally important is the dev team behind it, check for their track records. Check visibility of the project in social media, a project that has nothing to hide is great project.
Jump to: