Topic: How to pick best signature campaign - page 57. (Read 7043 times)
I rely on the reputation of the campaign manager. Of course, the analysis of project materials is also much aditional, but all the same in the community the most important is the reputation of people. The analysis of social media is also a good example.
First of all I check the project, whitepaper, team and so on. Anyway this project must be valuable, or it's no sense to take part in bounty campaign. Then I check the percentage of distributied tokens for bounty campaign and the amount of members. So, no secrets and nothing special I think.
When I choose a signature bounty I check the following:
- How prospective is the project
- How much is bounty budget for signature campaign
- How many participants are there
- How difficult the rules are.
Usually I take a signature of a project, which I would like to invest in.
- How prospective is the project
- How much is bounty budget for signature campaign
- How many participants are there
- How difficult the rules are.
Usually I take a signature of a project, which I would like to invest in.
First needs to check if your rank is allowed to participate. Review the project itself if the poject is unique, promising and with a solid dev team through their whitepaper. Look for experienced and reputable bounty manager as it will be a great factor. Do not go bounty for too long if there are available like 3 to 4 weeks or join atleast the last 3 weeks of the bounty.
First i look in bounty pool and read about project and i read the requirements for the campaign and i will not join a bad ICOs because it could be a scam.
if we ICOs we are join are scam,we will not be paid anything
if we ICOs we are join are scam,we will not be paid anything
I think you might need to invest your time on those icos that are be promoted by professionals signatures campaign manager like yahoo. I trust on this guy because he always take his time to analyze a projects before collecting for promotion here.
I am trying to work same bounty managers, there are some reliable ones. But the team and their social activities and the project are important factors for bounty campaigns. And I personally prefer to join them in short term.
Participating the signature campaign is my favorite activity right now in joining the bounty program. Yeah, commonly, I will consider some terms as int he followings:
1. Look at the bounty campaign manager, commonly choose the high rank or the experienced manager with good track-record
2. Look at the ICO project, whether it is trusted and promising or not
3. Never forget to see the softcap of the project
4. Then, analyze the token allocation and percentage for the bounty, and deeply percentage for the signature program, commonly I will choose the percentage over than 20% for signature only
5. Choose the signature rule that doesn't give or obligate the difficult task
Those are available to be the reference for joining the signature program.
I think, investing our time and energy in the signature campaign will be okay, for the reward is also big.
1. Look at the bounty campaign manager, commonly choose the high rank or the experienced manager with good track-record
2. Look at the ICO project, whether it is trusted and promising or not
3. Never forget to see the softcap of the project
4. Then, analyze the token allocation and percentage for the bounty, and deeply percentage for the signature program, commonly I will choose the percentage over than 20% for signature only
5. Choose the signature rule that doesn't give or obligate the difficult task
Those are available to be the reference for joining the signature program.
I think, investing our time and energy in the signature campaign will be okay, for the reward is also big.
The bounty should be chosen deliberately, the same number of projects have as of late become visible, which either don't pay anything to abundance individuals, or pay a penny. For the most part, the campaign keep running by understanding the signatures are good. You can likewise take in the validity of the crusade through particular destinations. read about the abundance on the off chance that it sounds cool and fascinating at that point pull out all the stops. To pick best campaign is to look on abundance pool and read about task.
Okay.. Taking part in a bounty is like investing in the project. In this case you are investing your time. And if you value time more than money, you will realize that before you invest in any project you have to do your own study. You need to check the real use of the project and its potential adoption level. Check out the experience of the team behind it and also check their social activities . By social activities I mean how they respond to reasonable questions put forward by experienced members of the forum. If many higher ranking members are many on the project, it's likely a good project.
Also, note that the reward you get depends on the time you join the campaign and how many members are taking part with their ranks.
Hope this helps a little?
Also, note that the reward you get depends on the time you join the campaign and how many members are taking part with their ranks.
Hope this helps a little?
Thanks, although I already knew about the doing "my own due diligence" the idea to check the answers of experienced members is actually a good one!
What criteria do you guys use to pick your signature campaigns. With some of them lasting 2-3 months it seems like a critical decision and I'm not quite sure how to go about it. With all the scams out there I am fearful of picking a junker which not only hurts me but the people looking at my promotions. I would like to have one picked out for when I switch over to Jr Member.
Yeah 2-3 months is quite significant waste of time should you end up joining a scam of an ICO. Better participate in airdrop so you can have minimal time wasted, if and if, ICO is a scam.
But we can all avoid something if we just follow projects managed by trusted managers or those whom we have worked with before. same goes for developers. Always follow those you trust.
Generally, before joining a signature campaign, I will at least read more information from their website to understand more about the project, the team, the roadmap, etc. I like the ones that pay on a weekly basis. Some project will last for a few months and will pay in the end, generally I do not like those that last that long to get my coins.
There are a lot of scam projects, so you have to research well about the project and the team involved with the project, read whitepaper, before the joining the signature campaign. As participating in a scam project is a waste of time and effort. I have participated a few scam projects before, wasting my precious time and effort.
In general, I will do judgment according to the heat of the project, if a project's followers enough, so I'm sure I can make money from the ICO project, this is my sole purpose.
These three r main I think:
1. Always make sure that the signature campaign manager is holding a considerable amount of BTC in escrow.
2. Make sure that the campaign runs for at least one month.
3. Don't join any campaign, which asks for more than 25 posts per week.
1. Always make sure that the signature campaign manager is holding a considerable amount of BTC in escrow.
2. Make sure that the campaign runs for at least one month.
3. Don't join any campaign, which asks for more than 25 posts per week.
for me, i choose based on their bounty manager and the project is not more than 3 months. percentage of allocation also should be consideration
What criteria do you guys use to pick your signature campaigns. With some of them lasting 2-3 months it seems like a critical decision and I'm not quite sure how to go about it. With all the scams out there I am fearful of picking a junker which not only hurts me but the people looking at my promotions. I would like to have one picked out for when I switch over to Jr Member.
As for me ideal bounty campaign should last up to 8 weeks, there should be limited amount of participants, good reward pool (>$50k), weekly stake/token reward system. Also I like when a bounty campaign determine the exact period of time of activity, no matter when do they raise hardcap and so on. I like my current campaign - effect.ai. The ICO is already ended, but as they determined the bounty campaign still ongoing. We know the result of the crowdsale (74% from the hard cap) so I'm happy that I'll get my reward anyway. As I know there is an oppotunity to get in it even now
What criteria you do not choose, it's still not guaranteed from wearing the signature of an unsuccessful project. Well, the scam can be seen from the team, by the availability of the finished product or at least the beta version, by the steps that the team makes during the time of ICO.
Most project, the ones that everybody is looking for dont allow newbies to participate in that specific type of bounty, however you can start with the translations bounty until your rank is Jr Member then you apply for signature campaign.
What criteria do you guys use to pick your signature campaigns. With some of them lasting 2-3 months it seems like a critical decision and I'm not quite sure how to go about it. With all the scams out there I am fearful of picking a junker which not only hurts me but the people looking at my promotions. I would like to have one picked out for when I switch over to Jr Member.
Campaigns that last a long time - two or three months is not the best choice. There is a high probability of making a mistake. And in that case, you will lose a lot of time. I try to participate in signature campaigns for 6-8 weeks and where there are fixed rates in project tokens.Jump to: