Topic: how to reduce scam projects (Read 340 times)
The value of a post is how much communication it can make across it reader your post is just filled with letters that's not providing any meaning you had a good topic to start with but more effort should have been but in the content
OP is basically concerned that a lot of scams are being promoted by high ranking members on this forum. He does not give examples of this, so we cannot reply to each on it's own merit. The moderators on the forum will only intervene, when someone are blatantly promoting some verified scam. < ;)OP does not see this, because the mods are doing a fine job to moderate it, when it is reported>
Also, high ranking accounts can be bought by scammers to run these scams and users are getting a lot of money for these accounts. 
Also, high ranking accounts can be bought by scammers to run these scams and users are getting a lot of money for these accounts.
The answer to question 1: because cryptocurrency nobody controls in addition to personal individuals who do not already know.
If it were at the state level, it would have long been covered by these harmful altcoins
If it were at the state level, it would have long been covered by these harmful altcoins
You shouldnt try to stop or government regulate ICOs. (Community regulation through discussion/ratings/escrow is fine) Anyone with a business idea or technical concept should be free to publish an ICO.
Unfortunately there are many scams, but the best option is to research the ICO in detail before you invest and think critically about the profits and market, instead of believing hype (opposite of FUD) or unprovable promises of the ICO managers. If you think it is a scam, you can post proof and warn other investors.
Some smart contracts (tokens) include refunds if the ICO doesnt meet its cap and there are some ICO escrow services available. Possibly trusted p2p escrow could be the future of ICOs (if the ICO is unsuccessful, funds are returned to investors).
If youre not sure about an ICO, you can choose to invest later when there is more information and development. Dont naively follow hype and (same as all crypto investments) dont invest more than you are prepared to lose.
Unfortunately there are many scams, but the best option is to research the ICO in detail before you invest and think critically about the profits and market, instead of believing hype (opposite of FUD) or unprovable promises of the ICO managers. If you think it is a scam, you can post proof and warn other investors.
Some smart contracts (tokens) include refunds if the ICO doesnt meet its cap and there are some ICO escrow services available. Possibly trusted p2p escrow could be the future of ICOs (if the ICO is unsuccessful, funds are returned to investors).
If youre not sure about an ICO, you can choose to invest later when there is more information and development. Dont naively follow hype and (same as all crypto investments) dont invest more than you are prepared to lose.
I don't think you'll be able to reduce them, but you can avoid them quite easily. Whenever you think about investing, check out the forums and some othe reliable sources of information.
Reduce phishing projects when you thoroughly understand the criteria of true value that the project brings to the community, the practicality. I just read through your post and it's quite lengthy, please summarize the main point.
I'm with you, let's get rid of scammers... but first let's get rid of shitposters. 
Are you using translation tools? Because your posts make zero sense. It's clear you can't speak English so the English speaking board probably isn't suitable for you.
Please we want the way forward wereby such trick ventures will be aborted.
You have point on your own but at least have someone with yountonrewors and arrange the idea correctly the entire post is useless with scrambled words bitnwhen you put them together it helps people.. . The the point of Chainguru
If you want, I can analyze an ICO for you. I advice you to read this articles as an example https://shitcoinoffering.com/6-icos-that-scammed-investors/
https://shitcoinoffering.com/no-country-for-shit-advisers-part-1/
https://shitcoinoffering.com/no-country-for-shit-advisers-part-1/
In my point, if you think about scam, the first thing you need to do to check the information about team and WP. Some people who do scam projects don't want to post their faces and information about their activities. The second thing is White Paper, the good project should have well-prepared documentation for the investors who can be interested in them. Usually scam projects haven't got detailed WP with decribing of ther idea and etc.
how to reduce scam projects
I really do not understand what you want to convey. And I find that is not a good solution, hopefully you will improve better for other posts 
My experience in avoiding the scams project is:
1. Evaluate team members and project advisors whether they are real people. Because there are projects to get the information of celebrities to trick people.
2. Analysis of white papers and roadmap to evaluate the idea of the project is realistic and potential long-term development in the future.
1. Evaluate team members and project advisors whether they are real people. Because there are projects to get the information of celebrities to trick people.
2. Analysis of white papers and roadmap to evaluate the idea of the project is realistic and potential long-term development in the future.
Evaluation of the team members and those advertising the project is key. With more than 85% of ICOs being nothing more than confidence scams, knowing the people behind it is the single most important factor. Most good projects these days are able to secure funding, or do not need funding, leaving the ICO market as a breeding ground for get rich quick scammers. The only people who benefit from these pump and dump schemes are the users behind it and their army of alts, who typically pay themselves in the form of signature campaigns.
You can not reduce scam! You can not just eradicate a project that is proven to be a scam, instead, spread the word to lessen the people being scammed by that project or team!!
I think the final solution would be if you have any doubts about the project do not invest in it. 
If we invest only in open source projects, experienced developers, have real plans and a real presence we will not lose our money.
Many are looking for quick gains so they will invest in any shit-coin and thus pump more power into these scammers and encourage them to do more projects.
I do not think that there is a sustainable solution other than that. This solution will be achieved by raising awareness and stopping greed
If we invest only in open source projects, experienced developers, have real plans and a real presence we will not lose our money.
Many are looking for quick gains so they will invest in any shit-coin and thus pump more power into these scammers and encourage them to do more projects.
I do not think that there is a sustainable solution other than that. This solution will be achieved by raising awareness and stopping greed
My experience to avoid phishing projects is whether the project development team is good and the project idea is realistic. Refer to many people's reviews of the project to decide whether to buy ICO.
Holy shit lmao. This really is unreadable, so let's try to at least decipher what OP is trying to say?
I think they're basically saying high-rank members are promoting shady altcoins? You can't really do much about this without centralizing decision making. No group should have the power to decide which ones are noteworthy and which ones aren't. Not even outright scams are moderated, so all you can really do against this is to wise up. The trust system is meant to address this and they do tag outright scams as far as I can tell, so that's something.
Maybe they mean forks by Bitcoin2? Like, they should be celebrated or something? I personally don't care for as long as they don't attempt a hostile takeover a la Segwit2x.
Maybe this is basically an extension of the first question? Like, moderating bounties or something? But yeah this is never going to happen while theymos is in charge.
presently my inquiry is; (1) why are the mitigator and high rank individuals are endorsing scamers to surmount this gathering... ongoing I took part in the majority of the undertaking and I found out that out of 89% of the recorded altcoin in this gathering are not taking the necessary steps, and why are a few people natureally pernicious by presenting such activities.
I think they're basically saying high-rank members are promoting shady altcoins? You can't really do much about this without centralizing decision making. No group should have the power to decide which ones are noteworthy and which ones aren't. Not even outright scams are moderated, so all you can really do against this is to wise up. The trust system is meant to address this and they do tag outright scams as far as I can tell, so that's something.
my qustion (2) do you cerebrate in the event that we have bitcoin2 that this trick will stop or it will at present sustains... on the off chance that then what do you cerebrate will do to stop any trick venture.
Maybe they mean forks by Bitcoin2? Like, they should be celebrated or something? I personally don't care for as long as they don't attempt a hostile takeover a la Segwit2x.
(3). is there no ways which the mitigators will get to all extend in advance of posting them in the bounty segments to dispose of all trick venture?
Maybe this is basically an extension of the first question? Like, moderating bounties or something? But yeah this is never going to happen while theymos is in charge.
Are you using translation tools? Because your posts make zero sense. It's clear you can't speak English so the English speaking board probably isn't suitable for you.
Be sympathetic to people like them. Maybe their ability is not good. But I still like what they do for the forum despite the language difficultiesI do have some sympathy, but at the same time this is an English language message board and if your post is indecipherable nonsense that nobody can understand then it's pointless, hence why people should stick to their own language because it's more productive.
Are you using translation tools? Because your posts make zero sense. It's clear you can't speak English so the English speaking board probably isn't suitable for you.
This.
The post is pretty much unreadable.
Are you using translation tools? Because your posts make zero sense. It's clear you can't speak English so the English speaking board probably isn't suitable for you.
Be sympathetic to people like them. Maybe their ability is not good. But I still like what they do for the forum despite the language difficulties
My experience in avoiding the scams project is:
1. Evaluate team members and project advisors whether they are real people. Because there are projects to get the information of celebrities to trick people.
2. Analysis of white papers and roadmap to evaluate the idea of the project is realistic and potential long-term development in the future.
1. Evaluate team members and project advisors whether they are real people. Because there are projects to get the information of celebrities to trick people.
2. Analysis of white papers and roadmap to evaluate the idea of the project is realistic and potential long-term development in the future.
Jump to: