Topic: How to remove negative trust? (from Lauda) (Read 1151 times)
Crypto-currencies bot for free! Crypto-Bot is a trading automation software for crypto-currencies. Trading bot support a lot of pairs, exchangers (Poloniex, Bittrex, Binance etc) and strategys like Emotionless, EMAspread etc. Bot can work locally on your computer or a server. Easy configuration & easy deployment. Join: https://crypto-bot.cc
Only Lauda can remove it.
Well i have pm'ed Lauda..
I think he seems don't cares. (by see Lauda's last login.)
If you have any questions about when or why Lauda will leave negative trust, I would advise reviewing this video.
LOL this seriously shows how much butt-hurt you are after you got bombarded with negative trust. I still wonder how you are here on this forum and manage to troll around without any issues.
You seriously need to lock yourself up inside a room and think about what you have done to farm trust in this forum. Now dont go around ranting about why Lauda is anti-Christ and how they "extorted" others. Those have become pretty old now - QS needs to try something new.
If you have any questions about when or why Lauda will leave negative trust, I would advise reviewing this video.
Now, if it had been you, that someone on default trust decided to neg, and you weren't on the DT yourself, I would imagine you'd be fairly ticked off that there would be little to nothing you could do about it, especially if you had not violated the written rules.
Huh."Q: Why haven't you banned
A: Possible (or real, not for me to decide) scams are not moderated to prevent moderator abuse. If we start picking out which ones we call "scammers" and ban, we would make a lot of decisions based on biased opinions."
src: here
DT shouldn't tag me with a negative trust because I scammed! It's not on the rules and I violated nothing!
Launda is a moderator in BTT. There are rules governing the forum. When you knowingly or unknowingly break a rule, the moderator will give you a negative trust. It is a way to check the activities of forum members. If such trust is giving in "error", you take the time to politely explain yourself. If the person that gave you the negative trust is convinced of your reasons the negative trust will definitely be removed.
No, being a moderator and being on DT (DefaultTrust) are two different things.
If you can take a minute to try and stop filling your post quota, you might take some time to read:
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/marketplace-trust-211858
The first number is the user's trust score calculated based on how consistently they've received positive feedback. Probably no one will get a score above 0 until the system has been around for at least a month. The second number is the number of reported scams. The third number increases with the number of positive reports, as does the fourth number in parenthesis, though the fourth number is more resistant to abuse. This text changes color depending on the score. Users with a negative score (attainable through scamming) get a red warning attached to their posts.
I think this statement is being interpreted as PERCEIVED scam.
What then can be done in a situation where it is perceived scam rather than a scam?
Launda is a moderator in BTT. There are rules governing the forum. When you knowingly or unknowingly break a rule, the moderator will give you a negative trust. It is a way to check the activities of forum members. If such trust is giving in "error", you take the time to politely explain yourself. If the person that gave you the negative trust is convinced of your reasons the negative trust will definitely be removed.
No, being a moderator and being on DT (DefaultTrust) are two different things.
If you can take a minute to try and stop filling your post quota, you might take some time to read:
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/marketplace-trust-211858
Launda is a moderator in BTT. There are rules governing the forum. When you knowingly or unknowingly break a rule, the moderator will give you a negative trust. It is a way to check the activities of forum members. If such trust is giving in "error", you take the time to politely explain yourself. If the person that gave you the negative trust is convinced of your reasons the negative trust will definitely be removed.
As you can probably see by now, there is no possible way to remove the negative trust yourself. If you could, what is the point of the trust system as it is?
Lauda is strict on account sales and the cancer behind such a business, ergo I see little to no chance in getting your account's trust back to neutral.
I see it the same way, however Theymos doesn't seem like he is willing to do anything about it. I think it is time this forum got an update: Trust system, new rules... etc.
Lauda is strict on account sales and the cancer behind such a business, ergo I see little to no chance in getting your account's trust back to neutral.
For the record, I think selling accounts "should" be against the rules ~
I see it the same way, however Theymos doesn't seem like he is willing to do anything about it. I think it is time this forum got an update: Trust system, new rules... etc.
Honestly couldn't agree more. It's unfortunate that the "premier" BTC site hasn't gotten an overhaul in the trust system and probably in a few more, probably more necessary, ways.
Really, if you make a career out of short-selling, and you see BTC is available to short now on the CBOE and you have no experience with crypto and come here to learn, well....you might feel all the actors are a bit sketchy.
Someone with some oomph will fill the void though.
As you can probably see by now, there is no possible way to remove the negative trust yourself. If you could, what is the point of the trust system as it is?
Lauda is strict on account sales and the cancer behind such a business, ergo I see little to no chance in getting your account's trust back to neutral.
I see it the same way, however Theymos doesn't seem like he is willing to do anything about it. I think it is time this forum got an update: Trust system, new rules... etc.
Lauda is strict on account sales and the cancer behind such a business, ergo I see little to no chance in getting your account's trust back to neutral.
For the record, I think selling accounts "should" be against the rules ~
I see it the same way, however Theymos doesn't seem like he is willing to do anything about it. I think it is time this forum got an update: Trust system, new rules... etc.
For the record, I think selling accounts "should" be against the rules, the problem is, it isn't actually against the rules of this forum. It is in bad taste, a bad practice in my opinion, and does deserve a negative reputation to be given (if it were indeed against posted rules of the forum). Since it is not actually against the posted rules of the forum, just a sort of tribal ruleset (that I personally do agree with) then negative trust being given because of doing something "inside" the rules is more of a violation.
If someone wishes to give negative trust (red) for selling accounts, let's first address the issue that it should be against the rules, amend the rules, and then start handing out red, not before. Just my opinion.
If someone wishes to give negative trust (red) for selling accounts, let's first address the issue that it should be against the rules, amend the rules, and then start handing out red, not before. Just my opinion.
OP wants an explanation how did he get a neg rep from a DT member, He explains like "why do I have to get a neg rep, I'm just selling my account" LOL funniest joke for a full member. How did you get into a full member not knowing that selling account is prohibited. And now statements above my post reply asking for removal of neg rep, well if you disobey, neg rep is irrevocable and no need to explain, period.
I think you might misunderstand me, or I you, sorry if that's the case, because I have no alts here. If I did, and used them for some underhanded purpose, even if within the actual forum rules, I honestly wouldn't feel fit to make a peep about anyone else. That would be rather hypocritical of me, or ANYONE else that did so, whether they see / admit to it, or not.
Sorry to disappoint you, but no "legion of alts" here, that sounds kind of like a bad DC comics title, lol.
I am familiar with how to edit the default trust list and have done that, and honestly, once people do some business around the forum and feel they can reasonably decide for themselves, they should do so. Not quite sure why you are arguing that, as I previously mentioned that, or it could at least be assumed from my previous "make your own trust" statement. To further illustrate my point though, when I have mentioned it before, probably months ago, Lauda actually replied that would be foolish. So, though you seem to be on the bandwagon with them, you apparently more agree with me.
Again, sorry to disappoint, but as for being a third-world poster, I am not from Chicago.
I am familiar with how to edit the default trust list and have done that, and honestly, once people do some business around the forum and feel they can reasonably decide for themselves, they should do so. Not quite sure why you are arguing that, as I previously mentioned that, or it could at least be assumed from my previous "make your own trust" statement. To further illustrate my point though, when I have mentioned it before, probably months ago, Lauda actually replied that would be foolish. So, though you seem to be on the bandwagon with them, you apparently more agree with me.
Again, sorry to disappoint, but as for being a third-world poster, I am not from Chicago.
Well the current situations that happened for those alts sanctioned with negative trust, I suggest that you should make an apology to the one whose provided you a red trust. Because if that will be a big case against you, I think you don't deserve an appeal of removing red trust on the profile you have. Its clear that having alts or breaking the rules in this forum will have a deeper penalty, which could leads you to be given red trust from a high reputation manager.
Sorry to disappoint you, but no "legion of alts" here, that sounds kind of like a bad DC comics title, lol.
I am familiar with how to edit the default trust list and have done that, and honestly, once people do some business around the forum and feel they can reasonably decide for themselves, they should do so. Not quite sure why you are arguing that, as I previously mentioned that, or it could at least be assumed from my previous "make your own trust" statement. To further illustrate my point though, when I have mentioned it before, probably months ago, Lauda actually replied that would be foolish. So, though you seem to be on the bandwagon with them, you apparently more agree with me.
Again, sorry to disappoint, but as for being a third-world poster, I am not from Chicago.
I am familiar with how to edit the default trust list and have done that, and honestly, once people do some business around the forum and feel they can reasonably decide for themselves, they should do so. Not quite sure why you are arguing that, as I previously mentioned that, or it could at least be assumed from my previous "make your own trust" statement. To further illustrate my point though, when I have mentioned it before, probably months ago, Lauda actually replied that would be foolish. So, though you seem to be on the bandwagon with them, you apparently more agree with me.
Again, sorry to disappoint, but as for being a third-world poster, I am not from Chicago.
I don't care if you make a statement on it one way or the other, I simply presented the question. If a reader of BTCTalk doesn't have the common sense to read the archives for themselves or actually read some of the "Trust" ratings you have been given in the past, that is on them.
The only person who does not have commen sense is you and your legion of alts. Go away from this forum if you dont like. I know you will be back because you third world shitposters dont have lives to lead and are begging around for every single penny that you can acquire.Quote
If I totally disconnected from it personally, then I would have to say that there is so much smoke, there might be a little bit of fire, and I'd steer clear in anyway that involved finances.
Account sales lead to shitposting as is prevelant in the entire forum. In case you dont know this then do so because its pretty late anyway.Quote
I enjoy a good few rounds of BlackJack, but I don't love gambling enough to trust blindly, I make my own and trust no default.
Then make your own trust list. There is the option to edit your trust list. The default list is supplied by theymos when anyone signs up on the website. If you fell they are untrustworthy then just remove them from the list.
I don't care if you make a statement on it one way or the other, I simply presented the question. If a reader of BTCTalk doesn't have the common sense to read the archives for themselves or actually read some of the "Trust" ratings you have been given in the past, that is on them.
If I totally disconnected from it personally, then I would have to say that there is so much smoke, there might be a little bit of fire, and I'd steer clear in anyway that involved finances.
I enjoy a good few rounds of BlackJack, but I don't love gambling enough to trust blindly, I make my own and trust no default.
If I totally disconnected from it personally, then I would have to say that there is so much smoke, there might be a little bit of fire, and I'd steer clear in anyway that involved finances.
I enjoy a good few rounds of BlackJack, but I don't love gambling enough to trust blindly, I make my own and trust no default.
Now, if it had been you, that someone on default trust decided to neg, and you weren't on the DT yourself, I would imagine you'd be fairly ticked off that there would be little to nothing you could do about it, especially if you had not violated the written rules.
Let me guess: You want me to make a statement on this, then let QS alt #94884 proceed to dig up a 4 year old post that is contradictory to what I stated in today? 
Not-again.
Resized because my eyes hurt.
Actually, I do understand the trust system as it relates to BTCTalk, and because I am aware of how it works I believe it can be manipulated. That said, you didn't answer the question, not that I really asked you, it was a bit rhetorical, considering that the accusations are attached to your account.
Now, if it had been you, that someone on default trust decided to neg, and you weren't on the DT yourself, I would imagine you'd be fairly ticked off that there would be little to nothing you could do about it, especially if you had not violated the written rules.
Just one reference, https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.24709890
Now, if it had been you, that someone on default trust decided to neg, and you weren't on the DT yourself, I would imagine you'd be fairly ticked off that there would be little to nothing you could do about it, especially if you had not violated the written rules.
Just one reference, https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.24709890
I do have a serious question though, November 2016, am I reading it wrong that someone accused Lauda of selling an account / accounts?
Personally, I don't like account selling, period, it just leads to all sorts of bad behaviour, however, it not being against the "rules", just an arbitrary persons guidelines seems like abuse of the Default Trust system to me.
In that case you don't understand the trust system and shouldn't make uneducated statements. Jump to: