Topic: How would online Bitcoin commerce work? (Read 2551 times)

In theory yes.
But it could be that curts aren't going to be specifically forthcoming, or honest as the status of bitcoin and dismiss it like: "Don't come to us with claims about your playmoney..'

I'm unsure about whenever such action would be legal, but even so it doesn't mean that the first few cases are dismissed even illegally.

IANAL but I think you can use ordinary civil law to enforce the contract made when you have a situation of "You offer - I accept" as long as you have evidence of:

1.   Offer is made by a specified individual of a specified item at a given price.
2.   Offer is accepted by a specified person and payment is made.

Think about what is in the typical bitcoin uri.
Say I want to buy a copy of Cryptonomicon by Neal Stephenson from Bitcoin Books and they give me a uri offer of:

bitcoin:15ZLe7GCAfdTTMMkbm38KTtahq9y549rB2?amount=3.25&label=Cryptonomicon, by Neal Stephenson

The only thing missing (for later court action) is the identity of the person making the offer.

You could do this in a couple of ways:
o Bitcoin Books offers a https service that validates the bitcoin URI is one of theirs (also prevents man-in-the-middle attacks)
o They sign the URI with a "trusted" private key and you check it against a public key.

If they failed to deliver (in the UK) you go to Small Claims court and say:

"Bitcoin Books offered my a copy of Cryptonomicon for 3.25 BTC.   Here's the proof they made the offer.  I paid.   Here's the blockchain proof.   They never delivered.   I want my money back".

No different to a million other non-bitcoin claims.

Because people that are looking for alternative methods on how online bit coin commerce would work they can send some suggestions for the new project?
and I'm lead coder although I'd like to keep my influences out of it.

Thanks for spamming the thread with a link to a thread where you link to an empty GitHub page you made telling other people how you want them to code your project for you, but how does this address any of the security / confidence issues that have been raised?

PHP? I wouldn't use that for new projects sorry if that is not very constructive.
Of course there will be solutions in a broad spectrum of languages in the future assuming success, so it doesn't really matter (go for it)

I have proposed BitcoinRetail a PHP open source project that is influenced heavily on the community... Go here for more details or to put in your two cents what a bitcoin store needs: https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.572344

Needs webapp/json integration, and a bundle with FOSS e-commerce software. 

No problem. I find the other examples on that page interesting too, especially assurance contracts.

Wow, that's really interesting.  Thanks for the info.

https://en.bitcoin.it/wiki/Contracts#Example_2:_Escrow_and_dispute_mediation

tl;dr Bitcoin could support a transaction that can be spent to either of 2 addresses, and must be signed by 2 of 3 parties in order to be spent. Either buyer + seller, buyer + mediator, seller + mediator can agree that the transaction should go back to the buyer, or to the seller.

Cash requires a face to face exchange that you don't have online.  Cash has existed for thousands of years, but how many transactions are conducted by sending cash through the mail?  Not many, and almost none where you don't have prior face to face experience. 

To achieve widespread adoption, we have to explain to people how they're not just mailing cash to anonymous craigslist sellers and hoping the computer / couch / buttplug shows up a few days later.

Sounds interesting, can you give more details about how this would work?

Exactly, bitcoin allows for the natural interpersonal web of trust to thrive on the internet. Perhaps bitcoiners should look at, integrate with, and expand upon existing WOT solutions such as

http://www.mywot.com/ (Actually is this a WEB of trust or just a LIST of ratings?)
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/WOT:_Web_of_Trust
https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/wot-safe-browsing-tool/

and of course our own

http://wiki.bitcoin-otc.com/wiki/OTC_Rating_System
http://bitcoin-otc.com/viewratings.php

+1 This.

The issue of disputes isn't a bitcoin issue.  Bitcoin = digital cash.  What happens if you use cash to buy xyz from abc company and they rip you off.  Can you call the Federal Reserve and request a chargeback of the cash transaction?  Yet cash (and other coinage) has been used for thousands of years.

Keep bitcoin simple.  Higher level protocols can be built on top of bitcoin. 
Escrows, forced arbitration, better business bureaus, even legal action are remedies.

The reality is that brand, and reputation are valuable and become more valuable with irreversable transactions.  It is what makes customers go back.  I go to newegg.com first because they have always treated me right.  Even if scammersRus.com has a cheaper price I likely am going to buy w/ NewEgg (although for some products Amazon is giving them a run for their money).

Bitcoin is and always should remain digital cash with all the advantages and disadvantages that come with it.  That doesn't mean higher level services can't be built on top of it. 

Its all about trust. period.

I highly doubt half the people from purchasing major website that you mentioned are going their because they know they can get their money back... I think they "trust" that the company will give the products up because they see the ad's on tv,internet, radio and then they hear they're friends talk about how great the service was so then they think "Well if everyone else uses and trust them, why don't i go ahead and give it a try?"
-----------

If your looking for a trust worthy bitcoin website try mine out. I've shipped over 8 packages already(if you need references PM and I'll supply them to you I don't like publicly stating peoples activity)
www.CheaperInCoins.com

With more advanced scripting accepted by the network, escrow can occur directly in the block chain, though some new partial transaction shipping protocols may be necessary.

@bc
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Web_of_trust

This, and Peter Lambert's #5, might not be far off. If trust is needed, why can't the marketplace provide it? Isn't this a business opportunity?

Imagine a "BitTrust" working to help bitcoin businesses establish themselves - like a credit rating agency geared toward bitcoin.
1) new businesses "register" with them to whatever degree they're willing:
  - participate in recorded video conference interview
  - provide valid photo ID, proof of address
  - submit to a credit check
  - submit to site security audits
  - post a bond, pay a periodic fee
  - attend face-to-face recorded interview with BitTrust employees
  - provide passports, fingerprints, social security numbers
2) BitTrust rates them and discloses their level of trust
3) BitTrust insures transactions with them for a price commensurate with their rating

Now, clearly one would have to trust BitTrust itself, but if they were a registered bricks and mortar operation themselves, maybe it could work (people could trust them enough to use their services). There'd always be the chance of collusion with an evil business, but if business were profitable, honesty might be their best policy - if BitTrust CEOs were on the line.


Sounds expensive, right? Maybe that's why credit cards charge such a high fee


It makes me think that the MOST important function of bitcoin has nothing to do with avoiding credit card fees - but more to do with it's Fed-proof nature.

EDIT:
Nice

Some of the consumer protections that credit card issuers provide are desirable for certain types of transactions.  Just because such consumer protections aren't commonplace with bitcoin transactions today doesn't mean that they won't be in the future.  And the great thing about providing consumer protection in a bitcoin context is that you can do it without having any of the issues associated with stolen credit cards (which I would guess is responsible for the vast majority of credit card charge reversals).

Bitcoin is a solid and simple transaction construct on which many different types of transactions can be crafted.  It's much more difficult to take a reversible transaction and build an irreversible construct on top of it.

+1