Topic: Huge rewards, less value or Less reward, big value - page 6. (Read 10734 times)
The strategy is great but I think that there are a lot of people on this forum, that are doing bounties as their first time job and when a project goes scam they are losing their last money. Be patient guys, crypto currencies are here to stay.
i'm going with less reward but big value, because i'm not that kind of people who hold bounty tokens for too long
if I am personally told to choose yes, of course I will also choose less prizes but the value is great. the problem is that we get a big prize but the red value is the same, we can't sell the results we get. the problem is that the gift if it has been obtained will sometimes be sold.
i'm going with less reward but big value, because i'm not that kind of people who hold bounty tokens for too long
I think that both things are not homogeneous and it is not a factor to decide or affect the big / small value (bounty). It depends on many factors, including market conditions - project quality - and the thinking of those involved in those rewards. hold is the way to increase the value of the biggest reward. although it was never easy.
yeah i see a lot of high paying bounty on the bounty section and i ask myself are they truly gonna pay this much to hunters or they knew the project won't be successful so whatever they give won't mean so much in the end, i think its about time hunters make better decisions when it comes to choosing the right project to support - even though it is not easy to tell which project will be successful or succeed
high paying bounties are not always what they seem.
high paying bounties are not always what they seem.
large or small allocations are not a problem, the most important is how they can achieve success when conducting an ICO, STO or IEO and after that how they can work to develop projects and maintain price stability
but if I myself have a better small allocation but have a greater value than having a large allocation but the value is small. because now many people choose gifts that have great value even though the allocation is small
large or small allocations are not a problem, the most important is how they can achieve success when conducting an ICO, STO or IEO and after that how they can work to develop projects and maintain price stability
but if I myself have a better small allocation but have a greater value than having a large allocation but the value is small. because now many people choose gifts that have great value even though the allocation is small
The current bad threat is for participants participating in the bounty campaign. Because many projects fail and cheat. The impact can from the beginning the results obtained are a little lost and irresponsible, then do not pay
Its either, as even though you get high or low rewards with either a high or low value in the end the token price is determined by the market. So what I would suggest to do is participate in potential projects that can be a big player in the future.
It's like having 100,000 of a particular coin Which is equivalent to $50 and having 100 of a particular coin Which is equivalent to $1000. I think we already know what we will go for as an individual. Most of us are here to make profit!.
Everyone in the Cryptocurrency space want to make it big especially bounty hunters, considering the time and efforts they put during bounty campaigns so definitely, less reward, big value is better than Huge reward, less value.
There have been a lot of posts questioning the rewards of campaigns in recent time, complaints about dev and team giving fewer rewards for campaigns. Many have eyes but cannot see, what is the use of huge rewards with no value in the future why you can be giving fewer rewards that will grow into something big if you can hodl, I will rather participate in a campaign with less reward and huge prospect than wasting my time overloading my portfolio with useless coins that will take me nowhere. If you really want to benefit from crypto, think less of what any new project can bring you new, think more of what you stand to gain in the future, be part of a good project. Don't be deceived by the promise of huge rewards that will deprive you of the future benefits which quality project can give to you. If you invest your time in good project today, even if the rewards look small, if you can hodl then future is certain. Be ready to sacrifice your today for your tomorrow.
Number of coins or tokens doesn't matter,only important is how much they get value when it hits exchange so even the ICO price can't be considered as our rewards.The same applies to the investors,when we hold 1 bitcoin is lot better than holding 10000000 cheap coins with no real value in the market. 
as works with beginning terms of initiation gives of returns on expectation the funds might goes on with further shifts on level with the modest of compliance as investors manage with use of expertise on expends as the request on arrange with the inauguration.
There have been a lot of posts questioning the rewards of campaigns in recent time, complaints about dev and team giving fewer rewards for campaigns. Many have eyes but cannot see, what is the use of huge rewards with no value in the future why you can be giving fewer rewards that will grow into something big if you can hodl, I will rather participate in a campaign with less reward and huge prospect than wasting my time overloading my portfolio with useless coins that will take me nowhere. If you really want to benefit from crypto, think less of what any new project can bring you new, think more of what you stand to gain in the future, be part of a good project. Don't be deceived by the promise of huge rewards that will deprive you of the future benefits which quality project can give to you. If you invest your time in good project today, even if the rewards look small, if you can hodl then future is certain. Be ready to sacrifice your today for your tomorrow.
It is not about more or less reward but it is about how strong the project and how dedicate the team is. Even some projects with less rewards are useless. I joined one bounty campaign called "Beasy" last year, they had total supply of 250000 coins, they finished their ICO, collected good amount but never launched their product, atlast that project turned scam although it was listed on Idex which was later delisted. I think instead of looking for reward we should look for the project concept and team's working. If project concept is strong and team is dedicated there are strong changes of its success. High rewards from such projects are like "Ice on the cake".
This has been around for sometime now ,bounties with huge rewards are every where promising millions of dollars for promoters which is all lies when the token get listed ,these kind of tokens always end up losing almost 90% of there value ,I prefer to promote bounties with low rewards simply because they are more reliable
large or small allocations are not a problem, the most important is how they can achieve success when conducting an ICO, STO or IEO and after that how they can work to develop projects and maintain price stability
There have been a lot of posts questioning the rewards of campaigns in recent time, complaints about dev and team giving fewer rewards for campaigns. Many have eyes but cannot see, what is the use of huge rewards with no value in the future why you can be giving fewer rewards that will grow into something big if you can hodl, I will rather participate in a campaign with less reward and huge prospect than wasting my time overloading my portfolio with useless coins that will take me nowhere. If you really want to benefit from crypto, think less of what any new project can bring you new, think more of what you stand to gain in the future, be part of a good project. Don't be deceived by the promise of huge rewards that will deprive you of the future benefits which quality project can give to you. If you invest your time in good project today, even if the rewards look small, if you can hodl then future is certain. Be ready to sacrifice your today for your tomorrow.
Better to joining a legit bounty campaign with a small reward than huge reward but scam campaign.
Too many campaigns doesn't pay the participants properly, delayed, low price token, etc.
When you received small amount of token with from a good legit ICO, you can sell it later with higher price.
The thing we need to be after first is what the project can deliver and if they can really stand the test of time, then from there, we can make the decision if the token is worth holding for future or good to be sold instantly when pumped. We don’t even get to have access to those tokens again, you finish a campaign, and either you don’t get the token, or they distribute token and never enter exchange, they could even lock your token too.
If we stick to the statement that bigger is better then i think bigger reward with even less value is good especially if the project is good and team is competent then holding these coins can yield huge reward due to price increase.
The number of awards is not an indicative factor of a promising project. For example, XRT gave me 70K tokens and were able to enter the listing on the exchange. Now the price of this coin is rising.
I think this is a hard decision because this situation is depend with project that our followed. I think less reward with big value is greater because if the coin supply is little but the quality of coins is good, many people will be hunt that.
it would be better if a small but large value reward would be preferred. now we can take the example of a coin that has a very large total supply in an exchange that only has a low price and becomes a rubbish coin. different from a coin that has a low total supply it must have a high price Jump to: