Topic: HumanResources Signature Campaign FLOOD (Read 1249 times)
At the moment there are 3 signature campaign, one owned by me, and the other two owned by SFR10 and Robertt. Hero Members and Legendary of all 3 signature campaign has been paid upfront; of course, it should be a must to adopt the escrow for a newbie that wants to start a campagn, but I consider that if you pay upfront even some category (in this case Hero Member), it is already a good step for have trust. Anyway I don't think that Humanresources will scam users.
There is nothing wrong in having multiple campaigns and i guess he wanted to try out variety of managers and make some kind of difference among all campaigns.If he has paid higher ranks an upfront then what is the point of this topic ? why would he scam the lower pay participants.
There is nothing wrong with that, heck e coin has 2 different campaigns both for pay per post and fixed rateBut there is reasonable number for multiple campaigns and i think 4 different topic is really out of mind
Tomorrow there will be one additional campaign maybe
This kinda reminds me on bitcoin black friday scammy campaign somehow
There is nothing wrong in having multiple campaigns and i guess he wanted to try out variety of managers and make some kind of difference among all campaigns.If he has paid higher ranks an upfront then what is the point of this topic ? why would he scam the lower pay participants.
They probably should delete one of their fixed rates first.... There's 2 active.
Really not a problem though.
Really not a problem though.
Scam: 1. a dishonest scheme; a fraud.
Don't exactly agree with OP but 1)Maintaining several campaigns, with some select few members being paid upfront
2) Advertising a site which has nearly nothing to do with BTC world and doesn't have any effect if given a negative rating here.
Just feels too shady IMHO.
Edit: And did I forget to mention, no use of escrow?
I don't know why a lot of the newer sig campaigns are not deciding to use escrow. When you are starting out, it is much better to use an escrow, even if it is a free one. Then when you are trusted, payout yourself. They should have paid all members upfront as it looks kind of dodgy now.
Is the Newbie account calling foul, accusing others of scams, not suspect?
I think so...do you?
I think so...do you?
This campaign really doesn't need two fixed payment schemes, agreed, but you can't simply jump to the conclusion that he's a scammer. He might just be trying out multiple managers, and finding out which one works the best for him.
You really can't say at this point in time.
You really can't say at this point in time.
hhhhm , HumanResources scammer ?! i dont think so
he paid me many times for design him some banners here in this forum
the funny till now i didnt understand his website how its work
Is this about whether or not they are scamming? If so, this is the wrong section.
Is this about whether or not its ok to run 2 identical campaigns? One was discontinued and moved to a different thread (see section "archival"). If so, this is the correct section.
Is this about whether or not its ok to run 2 identical campaigns? One was discontinued and moved to a different thread (see section "archival"). If so, this is the correct section.
The only thing I find shady about them is that their website is not completely developed and they aren't using escrow to manage their signature campaign. They pay upfront to only Hero/Legendary members but since they have a minimum post count of 25 and a weekly payment, it's not too risky to join their campaign as you lose max 25 posts (which is the only thing). They have paid me for their signature campaign but the signature they chose wasn't upto the mark (occupies complete spce of the signature box).
Can't term the website owner a scammer until it's proved. It's just that it appears too good to be true as they pay almost 0.0024 BTC per post which is the highest rate.
Can't term the website owner a scammer until it's proved. It's just that it appears too good to be true as they pay almost 0.0024 BTC per post which is the highest rate.
I'm not gonna try to post links cause I'm mobile but look at the gianluca campaign prices and the rest. Different rates
What I find odd about it all after looking over the services section I the campaigns all have different payouts. That's gonna make a mess
How so? I only see one rule difference in each, the min post count for services.
What I find odd about it all after looking over the services section I the campaigns all have different payouts. That's gonna make a mess
Found this on their thread ,the title said "Hiring Experienced Signature campaign Managers"
We are sorry we won't be able to offer you a position managing our campaigns in the next few weeks.
You should try our campaign for posting on other forums and reddit:
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1279581.0;all
I kind of don't understand your strategy.You hired a newbie to manage a campaign and declined a guy who is managing a very reputed campaign very smoothly ?I would like to know your "Eligibility Criteria" if you have any.
These criteria will not be made public today. We are not obliged to either provide this information to anyone or to hire anyone who believes they are qualified. Thanks.
We are sorry we won't be able to offer you a position managing our campaigns in the next few weeks.
You should try our campaign for posting on other forums and reddit:
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1279581.0;all
I kind of don't understand your strategy.You hired a newbie to manage a campaign and declined a guy who is managing a very reputed campaign very smoothly ?I would like to know your "Eligibility Criteria" if you have any.
These criteria will not be made public today. We are not obliged to either provide this information to anyone or to hire anyone who believes they are qualified. Thanks.
1st of all I wanna say you watch too much get rich or die tryin.
Now on to this human resources guy. I was offered the job to manage his campaign and I refused due to false advertisement. He advertised he was paying highest for any manager and ended up wanting to run a 60 user campaign and pay .1 for it. I declined the lowball offer and now hes allowing any tard on the forum to run a campaign.
Hes advertising dark web not human resources lol. I'm not sure yet if he's gonna scam since he seems to have paid every other contest hes ran but its fairly stupid to have so many campaigns and they're all tied together. Might be a good idea for the admins to limit him to 1 campaign period
Now on to this human resources guy. I was offered the job to manage his campaign and I refused due to false advertisement. He advertised he was paying highest for any manager and ended up wanting to run a 60 user campaign and pay .1 for it. I declined the lowball offer and now hes allowing any tard on the forum to run a campaign.
Hes advertising dark web not human resources lol. I'm not sure yet if he's gonna scam since he seems to have paid every other contest hes ran but its fairly stupid to have so many campaigns and they're all tied together. Might be a good idea for the admins to limit him to 1 campaign period
IMO that company isn't fake, it just probably isn't legal. Their sig campaigns are for advertising that they are hiring people for their company, which is a darknet company so it probably isn't entirely legal. There appears to be no scam about it and they aren't even offering any services, they just want people to work for them.
The questionable part is why they need four different campaigns for this.
The questionable part is why they need four different campaigns for this.
I haven't really noticed a whole lot of it yet, the spammiest campaign at this time seems to be the yobit campaign. Because they offer daily payouts it causes no end of stupid posts, I have reported some with little success.
What's the point of advertising something if you are not going to pay? That will only give you bad reputation, I don't see many campaigns doing that because it's stupid unless they advertise ponzi schemes.
Scam: 1. a dishonest scheme; a fraud.
Don't exactly agree with OP but 1)Maintaining several campaigns, with some select few members being paid upfront
2) Advertising a site which has nearly nothing to do with BTC world and doesn't have any effect if given a negative rating here.
Just feels too shady IMHO.
Edit: And did I forget to mention, no use of escrow?
Jump to: