Author

Topic: [HYP] HyperStake | Generous Reward Staking | Advanced Staking Controls & Wallet - page 133. (Read 679332 times)

legendary
Activity: 1064
Merit: 1000

Damn that new version is quick Cool nice work!! I do see one mistake though... HyperStake not HyperCoin Tongue

Also should I still be using hyp.altcointech.net as the seed node hardcoded into the wallet?

I caught and edited it before you quoted it  Cheesy

The altcointech.net address will not change. The separate address allows developers to use the explorer daemon as trusted node without having to change code for server changes etc. It is also in place if the need arises to run separate daemons for seeding.
legendary
Activity: 1330
Merit: 1000
Blockchain Developer
HyperStake made it as coin of the week on SuperNet Radio Cheesy

Check out the recording done by Jon Prints he gives a pretty good overview of the history and the current state of HYP. https://soundcloud.com/supernetradio/coin-of-the-week-episode-7-hyperstake-hyp
hero member
Activity: 808
Merit: 502

Quote
I am planning on adding a few more coins to my cute little explorer site. And also to expand the capabilities of the analysis too.

These kinds of tools make the coin more interesting and fun to have. I am looking forward to writing some of my own analysis tools once I retire in 6 months. Keep up the good work Presstab
legendary
Activity: 882
Merit: 1024
Well I'd love to steal press's credit, but alas, it's not my link nor my sight. That little piece of sexiness is all presstab.

I am planning on adding a few more coins to my cute little explorer site. And also to expand the capabilities of the analysis too.

I caught a glimpse and it's amazing, it blows every other explorer away.
legendary
Activity: 1330
Merit: 1000
Blockchain Developer
Well I'd love to steal press's credit, but alas, it's not my link nor my sight. That little piece of sexiness is all presstab.

I am planning on adding a few more coins to my cute little explorer site. And also to expand the capabilities of the analysis too.
legendary
Activity: 1610
Merit: 1000
Crackpot Idealist
Well I'd love to steal press's credit, but alas, it's not my link nor my site. That little piece of sexiness is all presstab.
hero member
Activity: 808
Merit: 502
Quote
For those new to HyperStake (like me!)

Press Tab sent me this link earlier:

http://www.presstab.pw/phpexplorer/HYP/chain.php


Thanks for the link Billotronic.  Definitely will check it out.
legendary
Activity: 1610
Merit: 1000
Crackpot Idealist
##hyperstake on freenode... about 8-9pm EST time.
sr. member
Activity: 307
Merit: 250
@billotronic

I intend to do something on the lines you suggest in the not too distant future with several coins I'm interested in. Party?!!! Where's the booze?  Wink
legendary
Activity: 1610
Merit: 1000
Crackpot Idealist
For those new to HyperStake (like me!)

Press Tab sent me this link earlier:

http://www.presstab.pw/phpexplorer/HYP/chain.php

I've now had time to have a good look at it. I can't recommend it highly enough for anyone new to HyperStake and hasn't staked (minted) yet. It gives a good idea of the current state of play with regards to staking.

It highlights such things as the difficulty, the weight and how much each block minted when it staked. I can see that block height merely means the total number of blocks minted. By comparison to blocks that have successfully staked, my blocks seem to be well on the way to staking, possibly well-ahead of when I thought they might.

the wikia is free to edit to anyone... why not write up a page on that and how to use it?

also,

Welcome to the party!
sr. member
Activity: 307
Merit: 250
For those new to HyperStake (like me!)

Press Tab sent me this link earlier:

http://www.presstab.pw/phpexplorer/HYP/chain.php

I've now had time to have a good look at it. I can't recommend it highly enough for anyone new to HyperStake and hasn't staked (minted) yet. It gives a good idea of the current state of play with regards to staking.

It highlights such things as the difficulty, the weight and how much each block minted when it staked. I can see that block height merely means the total number of blocks minted. By comparison to blocks that have successfully staked, my blocks seem to be well on the way to staking, possibly well-ahead of when I thought they might.
legendary
Activity: 1133
Merit: 1050
The example open-source CCE 4.0 explorer using a POS chain is now up using HyperStake at: http://openhyp.cryptocoinexplorer.com

For everyday use, please use the main HyperStake CCE explorer at: http://hyp.cryptocoinexplorer.com. The openhyp explorer serves as an example of the open source version of CCE 4.0

This version of the explorer has not been pushed to the repository yet. (Git is located at: https://github.com/cryptocoinexplorer/Open-Source-CCE-4.0 )

The major difference in this latest version is the transaction table on the block pages. Generating that table is harder then most people think. The code I have been using since CCE 3.0 works very well and is largely unchanged though CCE 3.99. However, it is very Rube Goldberg, and does not really follow good programming practices. I most certainly would not show that code to the public.  Grin  It is one of those unusual situations where odd code just worked better.

It has taken me a bit, but I have rewritten it with more standard programming practices. It is actually a bit longer and encompasses two functions for readability.

Once I release this version to the repository, I am going to make an official thread for open-source CCE 4.0 instead of posting in multiple threads as I do now.



I would like to hear what you think about removing links to the POS coin base transaction. This is the first transaction in the block and it acts as a placeholder of sorts where a POW block would generate coins as POS blocks generate coins in the second transaction. It is basically an empty transaction and as far I can tell holds no real useful information.


Very nice!

Unrelated to this explorer, we have a number of Peers on the network running some old clients. Not a big deal I'm sure... maybe they don't like skinning their gui Wink
legendary
Activity: 1330
Merit: 1000
Blockchain Developer
The example open-source CCE 4.0 explorer using a POS chain is now up using HyperStake at: http://openhyp.cryptocoinexplorer.com

For everyday use, please use the main HyperStake CCE explorer at: http://hyp.cryptocoinexplorer.com. The openhyp explorer serves as an example of the open source version of CCE 4.0

This version of the explorer has not been pushed to the repository yet. (Git is located at: https://github.com/cryptocoinexplorer/Open-Source-CCE-4.0 )

The major difference in this latest version is the transaction table on the block pages. Generating that table is harder then most people think. The code I have been using since CCE 3.0 works very well and is largely unchanged though CCE 3.99. However, it is very Rube Goldberg, and does not really follow good programming practices. I most certainly would not show that code to the public.  Grin  It is one of those unusual situations where odd code just worked better.

It has taken me a bit, but I have rewritten it with more standard programming practices. It is actually a bit longer and encompasses two functions for readability.

Once I release this version to the repository, I am going to make an official thread for open-source CCE 4.0 instead of posting in multiple threads as I do now.



I would like to hear what you think about removing links to the POS coin base transaction. This is the first transaction in the block and it acts as a placeholder of sorts where a POW block would generate coins as POS blocks generate coins in the second transaction. It is basically an empty transaction and as far I can tell holds no real useful information.


Damn that new version is quick Cool nice work!! I do see one mistake though... HyperStake not HyperCoin Tongue

Also should I still be using hyp.altcointech.net as the seed node hardcoded into the wallet?
sr. member
Activity: 307
Merit: 250
Hey so I had an idea about time estimation and wondering if you guys might be able to help me write some code for this.

So what I want to do is take the average network weight over a period of say every 50 Blocks starting the current height working back over max period to find the average rate of growth and then extrapolate that to find the future growth over the next period and weight it as it inputs get closer to their age.

So lets say you have the average plotted over 30 days, then you could take the average of each day to then get the growth rate. Then you would take the Block size and it's range (age - 8.8 * Blocksize up to a maximum of 30 days) and plot that against the average network weight within the range and expected growth.

The question is, how would you write something like that?

Honestly "network weight" is not real. Its really just an average of how much time it takes to stake over a set interval of blocks. You would be much better off using average weight spent per stake.

So what would be an approximate weight, for an individual block, where you could reasonably expect staking to be imminent, considering current difficulty?

If you look at this page you will see the last blocks staked on the network. It will tell you the weight of each block. If you click on the block height then you can get more information about the stake such as the size of the original block and the amount of days it took to stake. So for now it takes some manual investigating.

http://www.presstab.pw/phpexplorer/HYP/chain.php

Thanks. That page looks useful. I will check it out more thoroughly later when I arrive back home. I take it that 'Stake Height' means 'Stake Weight'?
legendary
Activity: 1064
Merit: 1000
The example open-source CCE 4.0 explorer using a POS chain is now up using HyperStake at: http://openhyp.cryptocoinexplorer.com

For everyday use, please use the main HyperStake CCE explorer at: http://hyp.cryptocoinexplorer.com. The openhyp explorer serves as an example of the open source version of CCE 4.0

This version of the explorer has not been pushed to the repository yet. (Git is located at: https://github.com/cryptocoinexplorer/Open-Source-CCE-4.0 )

The major difference in this latest version is the transaction table on the block pages. Generating that table is harder then most people think. The code I have been using since CCE 3.0 works very well and is largely unchanged though CCE 3.99. However, it is very Rube Goldberg, and does not really follow good programming practices. I most certainly would not show that code to the public.  Grin  It is one of those unusual situations where odd code just worked better.

It has taken me a bit, but I have rewritten it with more standard programming practices. It is actually a bit longer and encompasses two functions for readability.

Once I release this version to the repository, I am going to make an official thread for open-source CCE 4.0 instead of posting in multiple threads as I do now.



I would like to hear what you think about removing links to the POS coin base transaction. This is the first transaction in the block and it acts as a placeholder of sorts where a POW block would generate coins as POS blocks generate coins in the second transaction. It is basically an empty transaction and as far I can tell holds no real useful information.
legendary
Activity: 1330
Merit: 1000
Blockchain Developer
Hey so I had an idea about time estimation and wondering if you guys might be able to help me write some code for this.

So what I want to do is take the average network weight over a period of say every 50 Blocks starting the current height working back over max period to find the average rate of growth and then extrapolate that to find the future growth over the next period and weight it as it inputs get closer to their age.

So lets say you have the average plotted over 30 days, then you could take the average of each day to then get the growth rate. Then you would take the Block size and it's range (age - 8.8 * Blocksize up to a maximum of 30 days) and plot that against the average network weight within the range and expected growth.

The question is, how would you write something like that?

Honestly "network weight" is not real. Its really just an average of how much time it takes to stake over a set interval of blocks. You would be much better off using average weight spent per stake.

So what would be an approximate weight, for an individual block, where you could reasonably expect staking to be imminent, considering current difficulty?

If you look at this page you will see the last blocks staked on the network. It will tell you the weight of each block. If you click on the block height then you can get more information about the stake such as the size of the original block and the amount of days it took to stake. So for now it takes some manual investigating.

http://www.presstab.pw/phpexplorer/HYP/chain.php
sr. member
Activity: 307
Merit: 250
Hey so I had an idea about time estimation and wondering if you guys might be able to help me write some code for this.

So what I want to do is take the average network weight over a period of say every 50 Blocks starting the current height working back over max period to find the average rate of growth and then extrapolate that to find the future growth over the next period and weight it as it inputs get closer to their age.

So lets say you have the average plotted over 30 days, then you could take the average of each day to then get the growth rate. Then you would take the Block size and it's range (age - 8.8 * Blocksize up to a maximum of 30 days) and plot that against the average network weight within the range and expected growth.

The question is, how would you write something like that?

Honestly "network weight" is not real. Its really just an average of how much time it takes to stake over a set interval of blocks. You would be much better off using average weight spent per stake.

So what would be an approximate weight, for an individual block, where you could reasonably expect staking to be imminent, considering current difficulty?
legendary
Activity: 1330
Merit: 1000
Blockchain Developer
Hey so I had an idea about time estimation and wondering if you guys might be able to help me write some code for this.

So what I want to do is take the average network weight over a period of say every 50 Blocks starting the current height working back over max period to find the average rate of growth and then extrapolate that to find the future growth over the next period and weight it as it inputs get closer to their age.

So lets say you have the average plotted over 30 days, then you could take the average of each day to then get the growth rate. Then you would take the Block size and it's range (age - 8.8 * Blocksize up to a maximum of 30 days) and plot that against the average network weight within the range and expected growth.

The question is, how would you write something like that?

Honestly "network weight" is not real. Its really just an average of how much time it takes to stake over a set interval of blocks. You would be much better off using average weight spent per stake.
legendary
Activity: 882
Merit: 1024
Hey so I had an idea about time estimation and wondering if you guys might be able to help me write some code for this.

So what I want to do is take the average network weight over a period of say every 50 Blocks starting the current height working back over max period to find the average rate of growth and then extrapolate that to find the future growth over the next period and weight it as it inputs get closer to their age.

So lets say you have the average plotted over 30 days, then you could take the average of each day to then get the growth rate. Then you would take the Block size and it's range (age - 8.8 * Blocksize up to a maximum of 30 days) and plot that against the average network weight within the range and expected growth.

The question is, how would you write something like that?
hero member
Activity: 808
Merit: 502
Thanks LightSplasher...

just trying to help the idea of cryptocurrency grow. In light of what is going on in the world economically and politically, holders of cryptocoins may do very well in the long and short term. There is a great deal of instability in the world at large. Hopefully someone will take up this idea I have and run with it. If not I may do it after I retire next year.
Jump to: