Topic: [HYP] HyperStake | Generous Reward Staking | Advanced Staking Controls & Wallet - page 145. (Read 679332 times)

i guess i am doing something wrong here my last minted coin was one month ago, and wallet didnt stake anycoin since then.

gguys could you look this screen grab and advise thanks

http://prntscr.com/75dbzh

It depends on the size of your small blocks. If they are small enough they will combine implicitly (or, better to say, stick together) to get the weight of a block of approximately 300 HYP.

Added to the OP

Very nice! Thanks loszhor, I'll point few of my OG gridseeds to it. Services like this are good for volume.  oohhh charts https://prohashing.com/charts.html

If you want the staking process to handle the combination/split of your blocks automatically, then you will need to use the stakesplit threshhold http://hyperstake.wikia.com/wiki/FAQ#What_is_setstakesplitthreshold_and_how_to_use_it.3F

yes, you would have to do it manually.

This does not answer my question though. For example when I stake PayCon if there are small blocks in the same address they combine into one after some time. Is there the same functionality here in HYP or do you have to do it always manually?

Good day,

    As of a few days ago I had HYP added as a payout option at the Prohashing multipool. It is scrypt only at the moment and payouts are usually every two days but I believe they just added daily payouts methods. There website can be found at: https://prohashing.com/

    For those who are unfamiliar with how a "Payout Optional Multipool" works, it simply means that you mine there as normal except you have the option of getting your payouts in a coin that they offer instead of what you initially mined. Since HYP is POS only this will allow you to "mine" for HYP.

    Thank you.

This one minute video shows how to resize your blocks quick and easy http://youtu.be/6H4Xi3zr21g

If I have small blocks will they automatically combine into a bigger one if they are at the same address or do I have to somehow do it manually?

The explorer needs to handle all types of chains, including ones where fees are added to the reward or fees are destroyed.

One of the principal designs of CCE is that it does not attempt to read block chain files. It was one of the main reasons I wrote CCE.
Abe based explorers were running into issues because new coins would add or alter fields in the block chain and transaction databases. ABE expects information to be in specific places in the files, as it directly read the files looking for certain byte sequences and would look for information based on position from those sequences. There were also issues with hash algorithms as ABE would partially act as a node and if it did not have a module to encode/decode with that chains' hash algorithm, it would not work.
At the time ABE was developed, this was needed as coin daemons did not have the robust RPC that they have now. Since then, the coin daemons have much more developed RPC systems.

I believe the best source of information is the coin daemon itself and as such CCE gets all the information it needs from the coin daemon RPC. This avoids all the above issues and allows CCE to work with virtually any coin without modification.

I already have a couple of ideas on how to handle this new feature. I did not have time to add it before I released the open source version of CCE 4.0


Thank you

I just want to remind people that the open source version of CCE 4.0 is very basic . It is NOT meant to be demonstration of what CCE will look like when the closed source production version is released and CCE is upgraded.
The example explorers are examples of what the open source version of CCE 4.0 looks like when implemented as it is in the repository.


 
 

Awesome, thanks for the update! I really appreciate it

Looks like HYP is still well into the "high PoS" category, but is coming down rapidly as the supply grows and the max reward stays constant. Pretty soon we will be down in the CAPs range.

Hi Guys,

The last inflation update was quite some time ago so here are the numbers of the last six month's:

date           block        supply        inflation

HBN
1-12-2014   1451032   7540709    7,9%
1-1-2015   1556265   8096241      7,4%
1-2-2015   1680359   8765283      8,3%
1-3-2015   1800260   9349593      6,7%
1-4-2015   1932062   9998550      6,9%
1-5-2015   2059867   10683151    6,8%

CAP
1-12-2014   758924   8289383    13,4%
1-1-2015   812457   9432382       13,8%
1-2-2015   869457   10728528     13,7%
1-3-2015   926375   12058324     12,4%
1-4-2015   989934   13572195     12,6%
1-5-2015   1049849   15210644   12,1%

HYP
1-12-2014   160714   53258893   53,6%
1-1-2015   190299   75120101    41,0%
1-2-2015   221286   101346810   34,9%
1-3-2015   250312   127669954   26,0%
1-4-2015   279701   155844433   22,1%
1-5-2015   308140   183508459   17,8%


HBN has the lowest monthly inflation as always. Not al all strange because it has the lower POS rate compared to CAP and HYP. Designed at 100% but these days usually somewhere around 90% due to an increasing network stake weight. The POS rate for CAP shows similar effects. Having a POS rate somewhere around 180% these days.
All of them also show a decreasing inflation rate. It means that the increase of the money supply is more or less stable. For HYP this moment occurred about 6 months ago when a lot of people started to hit the stake maximum.

So it all looks quite nice and stable. which is quite an achievement considering the age of their block chains, almost two years for HBN and CAP and getting close to one year for HYP.

Thanks everyone for their contribution!

This would be interesting...

Pretty quick, I like it

Looks like we are indeed still high rate PoS for the majority of stakers

Fees are not destroyed.

Dreamwatcher: you can grab minted from the blockindex, if I remember correctly pindex->nMint

I thought that Fees were destroyed in HYP?

The first example explorer for Open Source CCE 4.0 is up!

As mentioned before it is a Blakecoin explorer.

http://openblc.cryptocoinexplorer.com/

The POS example explorer will be up in a few days. It will be a Hyperstake explorer.


I tried to squeeze in a commit to add total coins minted in each block. I almost had it, basically adding the previous block total mint with the current block reward and storing it as the current block total mint.

Then it struck... Fees. Fees are added to the block reward, so the coinbase transaction cannot be used alone without subtracting the block fees.  

The system will make it one way or another into CCE 4, and probably be added to open source.

I haven't planned on it.