[HYP] HyperStake | Generous Reward Staking | Advanced Staking Controls & Wallet - page 177.

presstab

legendary

Activity: 1330

Merit: 1000

Blockchain Developer

Quote from: ofeefee on February 13, 2015, 02:00:29 PM

just checked mine, 13 blocks out of sync, setting connect, see what happens. I cannot tell looking at the peers which ones may be correct protocol or subver?

so connect synced it back up, so i changed connect to addnode, and turned my listen off. Expected this to connect to your peer and then pickup good clients, but it's showing 84 blocks remaining now, so must be connected to some other clients that are on wrong fork.

Will let it run for a bit, then try something else.

Protocol and sebver are the same right now. Just check to see if your height matches up to the block explorer hyp and you should be good. Eventually these other nodes on their alt fork will slow down and get behind the main chain.

ofeefee

legendary

Activity: 1023

Merit: 1001

Tokenize Fantasy Sports

just checked mine, 13 blocks out of sync, setting connect, see what happens. I cannot tell looking at the peers which ones may be correct protocol or subver?

so connect synced it back up, so i changed connect to addnode, and turned my listen off. Expected this to connect to your peer and then pickup good clients, but it's showing 84 blocks remaining now, so must be connected to some other clients that are on wrong fork.

Will let it run for a bit, then try something else.

Biomech

legendary

Activity: 1372

Merit: 1022

Anarchy is not chaos.

Quote from: dreamwatcher on February 13, 2015, 11:12:07 AM

Quote from: mistercoin on February 13, 2015, 10:56:58 AM

Quote from: presstab on February 12, 2015, 09:05:10 PM

Quote from: dreamwatcher on February 12, 2015, 08:27:31 PM

Is there seriously going to be a true hard-fork with a few hours notice? If so, you are looking at a major train wreck.

Have the services that use/support Hyperstake been notified? I know I haven't, I only noticed it because it popped up in my reply post list.

Exchanges, explorers, gambling, etc etc?? All these services need time to get setup even after they are notified.

How many users are going to end up on a forked chain because they didn't happen to come to a forum where it has been announced in the last few hours?

Major exchanges have been notified, most of our services have been notified. You were on my list as well, just hadn't got there yet. Trying to do a lot of things at once here.

Quote

I was hoping that this was really going to be a soft fork until I saw this in the code currently in github:

Code:

if (pfrom->nVersion < 72099)
{
printf("partner %s using an old client %d, disconnecting\n", pfrom->addr.ToString().c_str(), pfrom->nVersion);
pfrom->fDisconnect = true;

I hope it is for testing purposes, and you are not intending to truly block out version 72000 from the new client (In other words a true hard fork) in the next few hours or even days.

This has to be a misunderstanding on my part. When is the hard-fork actually going to be enforced?

This was for my own personal testing. This should be doable via softfork, but I am sure old clients will be likely to get off on their own forks if not updated. Its hard to say for sure. At first we were planning on going all out and getting our whole list of fork items crossed off the list. This is just too much now, and too quick in advanced. I will simply be changing the timedrift code to 60 seconds. No difficulty changes or other changes. Hope this answers your questions, I will get you the updated code as soon as I have it.

No matter how much work someone puts into something, time, effort, sweat and tears, there will always be some douchebag(s) that will try to undermine all of your work...

Excuse me??

It is obvious you do not know who I am, nor do you understand what is going on. The only "douchebag" I see here is yourself.

Next time try to comprehend what is going on and who it involves before you make incorrect statements and embarrass yourself.

I don't think it was aimed at you Cheesy

Just a general comment that if there is an exploit, some jackass will use it.

Hilux74

legendary

Activity: 912

Merit: 1000

Wish I looked at this thread before going to work...old wallet running away oblivious to whether it is on the fork or the spoon side of the equation.

presstab

legendary

Activity: 1330

Merit: 1000

Blockchain Developer

Mac Binary has been built by billotronic and added to the release page

https://github.com/hyperstake/HyperStake/releases/tag/v1.1

dreamwatcher

legendary

Activity: 1064

Merit: 1000

Quote from: mistercoin on February 13, 2015, 10:56:58 AM

Quote from: presstab on February 12, 2015, 09:05:10 PM

Quote from: dreamwatcher on February 12, 2015, 08:27:31 PM

Is there seriously going to be a true hard-fork with a few hours notice? If so, you are looking at a major train wreck.

Have the services that use/support Hyperstake been notified? I know I haven't, I only noticed it because it popped up in my reply post list.

Exchanges, explorers, gambling, etc etc?? All these services need time to get setup even after they are notified.

How many users are going to end up on a forked chain because they didn't happen to come to a forum where it has been announced in the last few hours?

Major exchanges have been notified, most of our services have been notified. You were on my list as well, just hadn't got there yet. Trying to do a lot of things at once here.

Quote

I was hoping that this was really going to be a soft fork until I saw this in the code currently in github:

Code:

if (pfrom->nVersion < 72099)
{
printf("partner %s using an old client %d, disconnecting\n", pfrom->addr.ToString().c_str(), pfrom->nVersion);
pfrom->fDisconnect = true;

I hope it is for testing purposes, and you are not intending to truly block out version 72000 from the new client (In other words a true hard fork) in the next few hours or even days.

This has to be a misunderstanding on my part. When is the hard-fork actually going to be enforced?

This was for my own personal testing. This should be doable via softfork, but I am sure old clients will be likely to get off on their own forks if not updated. Its hard to say for sure. At first we were planning on going all out and getting our whole list of fork items crossed off the list. This is just too much now, and too quick in advanced. I will simply be changing the timedrift code to 60 seconds. No difficulty changes or other changes. Hope this answers your questions, I will get you the updated code as soon as I have it.

No matter how much work someone puts into something, time, effort, sweat and tears, there will always be some douchebag(s) that will try to undermine all of your work...

Excuse me??

It is obvious you do not know who I am, nor do you understand what is going on. The only "douchebag" I see here is yourself.

Next time try to comprehend what is going on and who it involves before you make incorrect statements and embarrass yourself.

ryanb

legendary

Activity: 1148

Merit: 1000

Quote from: presstab on February 13, 2015, 11:04:19 AM

Quote from: ryanb on February 13, 2015, 11:02:52 AM

Quote from: presstab on February 13, 2015, 10:32:14 AM

Quote from: ryanb on February 13, 2015, 10:19:39 AM

my new wallet keeps going out of sync

any ideas why is it doing that?

There are two competing forks at the moment. If you are running the new version, you should be on the correct fork. Given enough time, the reorg settings will not look far enough back to find the other fork.

You can solve the problem temporarily by connecting to my server, and leaving it with only one connection for a few hours. I think this should get rid of the message. Personally, my QT wallet is not saying out of sync.

If you want to connect:
connect=104.131.135.232

I am getting 0 connections, connecting to your server, i added the connect command to the conf file.

Hmm it could be at full capacity now.

I got 1 connection now and it is in sync

presstab

legendary

Activity: 1330

Merit: 1000

Blockchain Developer

Quote from: ryanb on February 13, 2015, 11:02:52 AM

Quote from: presstab on February 13, 2015, 10:32:14 AM

Quote from: ryanb on February 13, 2015, 10:19:39 AM

my new wallet keeps going out of sync

any ideas why is it doing that?

There are two competing forks at the moment. If you are running the new version, you should be on the correct fork. Given enough time, the reorg settings will not look far enough back to find the other fork.

You can solve the problem temporarily by connecting to my server, and leaving it with only one connection for a few hours. I think this should get rid of the message. Personally, my QT wallet is not saying out of sync.

If you want to connect:
connect=104.131.135.232

I am getting 0 connections, connecting to your server, i added the connect command to the conf file.

Hmm it could be at full capacity now.

ryanb

legendary

Activity: 1148

Merit: 1000

Quote from: presstab on February 13, 2015, 10:32:14 AM

Quote from: ryanb on February 13, 2015, 10:19:39 AM

my new wallet keeps going out of sync

any ideas why is it doing that?

There are two competing forks at the moment. If you are running the new version, you should be on the correct fork. Given enough time, the reorg settings will not look far enough back to find the other fork.

You can solve the problem temporarily by connecting to my server, and leaving it with only one connection for a few hours. I think this should get rid of the message. Personally, my QT wallet is not saying out of sync.

If you want to connect:
connect=104.131.135.232

I am getting 0 connections, connecting to your server, i added the connect command to the conf file.

mistercoin

legendary

Activity: 1051

Merit: 1000

https://r.honeygain.me/XEDDM2B07C

Quote from: presstab on February 12, 2015, 09:05:10 PM

Quote from: dreamwatcher on February 12, 2015, 08:27:31 PM

Is there seriously going to be a true hard-fork with a few hours notice? If so, you are looking at a major train wreck.

Have the services that use/support Hyperstake been notified? I know I haven't, I only noticed it because it popped up in my reply post list.

Exchanges, explorers, gambling, etc etc?? All these services need time to get setup even after they are notified.

How many users are going to end up on a forked chain because they didn't happen to come to a forum where it has been announced in the last few hours?

Major exchanges have been notified, most of our services have been notified. You were on my list as well, just hadn't got there yet. Trying to do a lot of things at once here.

Quote

I was hoping that this was really going to be a soft fork until I saw this in the code currently in github:

Code:

if (pfrom->nVersion < 72099)
{
printf("partner %s using an old client %d, disconnecting\n", pfrom->addr.ToString().c_str(), pfrom->nVersion);
pfrom->fDisconnect = true;

I hope it is for testing purposes, and you are not intending to truly block out version 72000 from the new client (In other words a true hard fork) in the next few hours or even days.

This has to be a misunderstanding on my part. When is the hard-fork actually going to be enforced?

This was for my own personal testing. This should be doable via softfork, but I am sure old clients will be likely to get off on their own forks if not updated. Its hard to say for sure. At first we were planning on going all out and getting our whole list of fork items crossed off the list. This is just too much now, and too quick in advanced. I will simply be changing the timedrift code to 60 seconds. No difficulty changes or other changes. Hope this answers your questions, I will get you the updated code as soon as I have it.

No matter how much work someone puts into something, time, effort, sweat and tears, there will always be some douchebag(s) that will try to undermine all of your work...

ryanb

legendary

Activity: 1148

Merit: 1000

Quote from: nioc on February 13, 2015, 10:36:51 AM

I just staked a block while "out of sync" and ~~am now synced~~.

Mine also staked while out of sync

nioc

legendary

Activity: 1624

Merit: 1008

I just staked a block while "out of sync" and ~~am now synced~~.

presstab

legendary

Activity: 1330

Merit: 1000

Blockchain Developer

Quote from: ryanb on February 13, 2015, 10:19:39 AM

my new wallet keeps going out of sync

any ideas why is it doing that?

There are two competing forks at the moment. If you are running the new version, you should be on the correct fork. Given enough time, the reorg settings will not look far enough back to find the other fork.

You can solve the problem temporarily by connecting to my server, and leaving it with only one connection for a few hours. I think this should get rid of the message. Personally, my QT wallet is not saying out of sync.

If you want to connect:
connect=104.131.135.232

ryanb

legendary

Activity: 1148

Merit: 1000

my new wallet keeps going out of sync

any ideas why is it doing that?

presstab

legendary

Activity: 1330

Merit: 1000

Blockchain Developer

Quote from: nioc on February 13, 2015, 09:44:43 AM

I just checked and I am on the same block # so I assume everything is ok there.

Right after checking my wallet said it was out of sync and was synchronizing with the network with 8 blocks remained and then 19 blocks. After a couple of minutes it now says 18 blocks remaining.

It went down to 17 blocks behind and now is at 21 blocks. I am still on the same blockcount as hyp.cryptocoinexplorer.com

Edit#2 will this effect staking?

I think this is the shitty part of this whole "soft fork" route where we still allow connections to other clients. They have gone off on their fork, and we still see them.

This should not affect staking, at least it hasnt for me so far.

nioc

legendary

Activity: 1624

Merit: 1008

I just checked and I am on the same block # so I assume everything is ok there.

Right after checking my wallet said it was out of sync and was synchronizing with the network with 8 blocks remained and then 19 blocks. After a couple of minutes it now says 18 blocks remaining.

It went down to 17 blocks behind and now is at 21 blocks. I am still on the same blockcount as hyp.cryptocoinexplorer.com

Edit#2 will this effect staking?

presstab

legendary

Activity: 1330

Merit: 1000

Blockchain Developer

Quote from: almightyruler on February 13, 2015, 09:12:52 AM

Quote from: David Latapie on February 13, 2015, 08:39:47 AM

Try install instruction here (for Linux)
Installation guide

Thanks, but I've built the HYP daemon before without any issues. It looks like a possible programming error.

A file which appears only in the newer version, clientversion.cpp, seems to dupe define a couple of functions.

Commenting out both FormatFullVersion() and FormatSubVersion() in clientversion.cpp allows the build to complete. The duplicate functions are not quite identical, so I'll let the dev determine which ones should be retained.

edit: just checked github, and the latest commit (a minute ago - good timing!) has deleted these from util.cpp. Will try a build with the update.

Yep, we just recently ported over to autotools and have found that bug. Allejupa got it all updated and it should be working now. I have also been maintaining a non-autotools port at github.com/presstab/hyperstake that you could try.

For anyone wondering if they are on the correct chain, hyp.cryptocoinexplorer.com is on the correct chain, so double check there

almightyruler

legendary

Activity: 2268

Merit: 1092

Quote from: David Latapie on February 13, 2015, 08:39:47 AM

Try install instruction here (for Linux)
Installation guide

Thanks, but I've built the HYP daemon before without any issues. It looks like a possible programming error.

A file which appears only in the newer version, clientversion.cpp, seems to dupe define a couple of functions.

Commenting out both FormatFullVersion() and FormatSubVersion() in clientversion.cpp allows the build to complete. The duplicate functions are not quite identical, so I'll let the dev determine which ones should be retained.

edit: just checked github, and the latest commit (a minute ago - good timing!) has deleted these from util.cpp. Will try a build with the update.

David Latapie

hero member

Activity: 658

Merit: 503

Monero Core Team

Try install instruction here (for Linux)
Installation guide

almightyruler

legendary

Activity: 2268

Merit: 1092

No luck with current github version... same function defined twice?

CXXLD hyperstaked libbitcoin_util.a(libbitcoin_util_a-util.o): In function `FormatFullVersion()': /var/coins/hyperstake/src/HyperStake-master/src/util.cpp:1325: multiple definition of `FormatFullVersion()' libbitcoin_util.a(libbitcoin_util_a-clientversion.o):/var/coins/hyperstake/src/HyperStake-master/src/clientversion.cpp:89: first defined here libbitcoin_util.a(libbitcoin_util_a-util.o): In function `FormatSubVersion(std::string const&, int, std::vector > const&)': /var/coins/hyperstake/src/HyperStake-master/src/util.cpp:1331: multiple definition of `FormatSubVersion(std::string const&, int, std::vector > const&)' libbitcoin_util.a(libbitcoin_util_a-clientversion.o):/var/coins/hyperstake/src/HyperStake-master/src/clientversion.cpp:97: first defined here gmake[1]: *** [hyperstaked] Error 1 gmake[1]: Leaving directory `/var/coins/hyperstake/src/HyperStake-master/src' gmake: *** [all-recursive] Error 1

Topic: [HYP] HyperStake | Generous Reward Staking | Advanced Staking Controls & Wallet - page 177. (Read 679332 times)