Topic: [HYP] HyperStake | Generous Reward Staking | Advanced Staking Controls & Wallet - page 191. (Read 679332 times)
January 05, 2015, 04:30:03 PM
It is Ponzi without a doubt. Standard, not very detailed legend (even no spoofed proofs), standard protected whois data, unbelievably high returns that trading can never deliver (at least constantly). I would say it is a so called "fast" which usually lives a week or two. This one is three weeks old, so the end is near, probably no more than in few weeks. At this moment all investors should consider not to invest more or reinvest, if they want to end up with profit.
January 05, 2015, 04:17:38 PM
Multisend or recurring payments?
Mintcoin uses the term "recurring payments" instead of S4C. I find "recurring payments" much more appealing than multisend (I can say that, since I am the one who proposed 'multisend'). And you, what do you prefer? 'multisend' or 'recurring payements'?
Mintcoin uses the term "recurring payments" instead of S4C. I find "recurring payments" much more appealing than multisend (I can say that, since I am the one who proposed 'multisend'). And you, what do you prefer? 'multisend' or 'recurring payements'?
'Recurring payments' is describing the essence of feature more precisely, but is inconvenient for usage in terms of phonetics and sounds like a generalized description rather then a feature name. Besides that, it's better to implement unique names, if they are not standardized. 'Multisend' is good but quite misleading, as it can be confused with Bitcoin's sendmany RPC call. We can try 'Autosend(s)' or 'Autopayment(s)', or something like this.
What about "Cyclic send"?
Wasn't the name "multisend" picked due to proposed feature to perform multiple s4c ? (More than 2).
David, correct me if I am wrong on this.
Also, I think "reaccuring" is only the nature of the function and should be undertood and expected by user, as it would continue to preform a set function untill changed by user again.
January 05, 2015, 03:48:50 PM
Well, I agree that it Probably IS a Ponzi, but at this point it is all speculation. I have heard of no one that has not been paid, and I have gotten everything I have submitted back times 2 (But I am only using coins that have relatively low value) but free is free. So no harm at this point. Only submitting 50% of profits gained until they up and run..
You got paid in the expectation you would make posts telling people how you doubled your money which in turn would encourage others to deposit.
Obvious ponzi is obvious! There is no other explanation.
ponzi ! just the first get rewarded, you all know the end !
http://nephos.files.wordpress.com/2011/06/caution.jpeg
http://nephos.files.wordpress.com/2011/06/caution.jpeg
January 05, 2015, 02:55:33 PM
Well, I agree that it Probably IS a Ponzi, but at this point it is all speculation. I have heard of no one that has not been paid, and I have gotten everything I have submitted back times 2 (But I am only using coins that have relatively low value) but free is free. So no harm at this point. Only submitting 50% of profits gained until they up and run..
January 05, 2015, 02:02:06 PM
January 05, 2015, 01:44:23 PM
ponzi ! just the first get rewarded, you all know the end !
January 05, 2015, 01:37:06 PM
I redirected my S4C to there yesterday, so 25% of my stake go there. I will probably make less than you, but I like to automated way to do so. Now it would be even better if presstab fixed the issue with S4C picking a random block and turn it into a working compilation 
A question though: 30*6=60. Whence this 80K?
A question though: 30*6=60. Whence this 80K?
I just pulled a few figures from this cryptodouble.com website, and I thought I'd share them with you....
In the LAST 20 HOURS ALONE, they have RECEIVED:
217 BTC
3315 LTC (equivalent 26 BTC)
31+ Million DOGE (equivalent 18 BTC)
1792 Paycoin (equivalent 21 BTC)
467,260 HYP (equivalent 1BTC)
And this is just SOME of the coins I've gone through.... and remember, that's just in 20 HOURS.
So, just adding the totals up above, they've RECEIVED 283 BTC of coins, in less than 24 hours.... and they're promising to pay out double this in less than 4 days from now?
?Wish I'd thought of this - afterall, if I received $75,000 in 20 hours, you think I'd want to be paying out $150,000 by the end of the week, or would I walk away with everything?
??Just a thought..... and lets not forget what I didn't count for the other 80 hours they've been receiving crypto. If someone else wants to scroll through all the data, I'd love to see the figures
i am sure they walk away after 3-4 weeks,
once they reach to target theft money.....
January 05, 2015, 11:48:39 AM
So it's official, Paybase bought Coinswap.
It seems a handful of coins have asked for delisting from coinswap due to the bad air surrounding GAW/Paybase. Blackcoin, Opal, LTC & Doge...
It seems a handful of coins have asked for delisting from coinswap due to the bad air surrounding GAW/Paybase. Blackcoin, Opal, LTC & Doge...
January 05, 2015, 11:10:26 AM
anyone knows why HYP is frozen on Poloniex?
unfrozen now
January 05, 2015, 11:02:54 AM
anyone knows why HYP is frozen on Poloniex?
January 05, 2015, 10:33:08 AM
Just make sure to refrain from using referral links.
January 05, 2015, 10:18:34 AM
So ways to make more HYP are not the topic on the HYP forum?? News to me...
January 05, 2015, 09:57:32 AM
I redirected my S4C to there yesterday, so 25% of my stake go there. I will probably make less than you, but I like to automated way to do so. Now it would be even better if presstab fixed the issue with S4C picking a random block and turn it into a working compilation
A question though: 30*6=60. Whence this 80K?
A question though: 30*6=60. Whence this 80K?
I was referencing what I have made in the past 200 hours, one deposit of 30k got me 60k back and another deposit of 10k got me 20k back, all of which originated from the original 30k. but soon to have another 20k..
The biggest question is, Is this site legit?? or is it a Ponzi that is just beginning?? No one knows for sure yet, but there is a lot of money to be made. At at this point, I am only investing what I have made in profits, so will have to see how far we can take this. I will be extremely happy to see this site still running in 60 days..
That's not really the topic here.
January 05, 2015, 09:54:59 AM
I redirected my S4C to there yesterday, so 25% of my stake go there. I will probably make less than you, but I like to automated way to do so. Now it would be even better if presstab fixed the issue with S4C picking a random block and turn it into a working compilation
A question though: 30*6=60. Whence this 80K?
A question though: 30*6=60. Whence this 80K?
I was referencing what I have made in the past 200 hours, one deposit of 30k got me 60k back and another deposit of 10k got me 20k back, all of which originated from the original 30k. but soon to have another 20k..
The biggest question is, Is this site legit?? or is it a Ponzi that is just beginning?? No one knows for sure yet, but there is a lot of money to be made. At at this point, I am only investing what I have made in profits, so will have to see how far we can take this. I will be extremely happy to see this site still running in 60 days..
January 05, 2015, 09:34:02 AM
"Subscriptions"
mouse over "Feature allows for automatic recurring payments"
alt
"AutoPay"
Mouse over: good idea (to follow the principal of least astonishement, there should be small question mark, then)mouse over "Feature allows for automatic recurring payments"
alt
"AutoPay"
"Subscriptions" and "AutoPay" are words that restrict the use case/ All the example below are cases of not paying but just sending for other reasons.
What about "Cyclic send"?
Not a fan, but in the end, I'd like the community to decide, not me alone January 05, 2015, 09:27:19 AM
Multisend or recurring payments?
Mintcoin uses the term "recurring payments" instead of S4C. I find "recurring payments" much more appealing than multisend (I can say that, since I am the one who proposed 'multisend'). And you, what do you prefer? 'multisend' or 'recurring payements'?
Mintcoin uses the term "recurring payments" instead of S4C. I find "recurring payments" much more appealing than multisend (I can say that, since I am the one who proposed 'multisend'). And you, what do you prefer? 'multisend' or 'recurring payements'?
'Recurring payments' is describing the essence of feature more precisely, but is inconvenient for usage in terms of phonetics and sounds like a generalized description rather then a feature name. Besides that, it's better to implement unique names, if they are not standardized. 'Multisend' is good but quite misleading, as it can be confused with Bitcoin's sendmany RPC call. We can try 'Autosend(s)' or 'Autopayment(s)', or something like this.
What about "Cyclic send"?
January 05, 2015, 09:21:27 AM
"Subscriptions"
mouse over "Feature allows for automatic recurring payments"
alt
"AutoPay"
mouse over "Feature allows for automatic recurring payments"
alt
"AutoPay"
January 05, 2015, 09:15:06 AM
Multisend or recurring payments?
Mintcoin uses the term "recurring payments" instead of S4C. I find "recurring payments" much more appealing than multisend (I can say that, since I am the one who proposed 'multisend'). And you, what do you prefer? 'multisend' or 'recurring payements'?
Mintcoin uses the term "recurring payments" instead of S4C. I find "recurring payments" much more appealing than multisend (I can say that, since I am the one who proposed 'multisend'). And you, what do you prefer? 'multisend' or 'recurring payements'?
'Recurring payments' is describing the essence of feature more precisely, but is inconvenient for usage in terms of phonetics and sounds like a generalized description rather then a feature name. Besides that, it's better to implement unique names, if they are not standardized. 'Multisend' is good but quite misleading, as it can be confused with Bitcoin's sendmany RPC call. We can try 'Autosend(s)' or 'Autopayment(s)', or something like this.
January 05, 2015, 09:07:22 AM
Multisend or recurring payments?
Mintcoin uses the term "recurring payments" instead of S4C. I find "recurring payments" much more appealing than multisend (I can say that, since I am the one who proposed 'multisend'). And you, what do you prefer? 'multisend' or 'recurring payements'?
Mintcoin uses the term "recurring payments" instead of S4C. I find "recurring payments" much more appealing than multisend (I can say that, since I am the one who proposed 'multisend'). And you, what do you prefer? 'multisend' or 'recurring payements'?
'Recurring payments' is describing the essence of feature more precisely, but is inconvenient for usage in terms of phonetics and sounds like a generalized description rather than a feature name. Besides that, it's better to implement unique names, if they are not standardized. 'Multisend' is good but quite misleading, as it can be confused with Bitcoin's sendmany RPC call. We can try 'Autosend(s)' or 'Autopayment(s)', or something like this.
January 05, 2015, 08:46:44 AM
Multisend or recurring payments?
Mintcoin uses the term "recurringsend" instead of S4C.
That got me thinking. What about changing the proposed name "multisend" for "recurring send" (at first, I proposed recurring payment", but payment is only one kind of sending as examplified by the HyperSend page? It fits the principle of least astonishment (POLA) much more appealing than multisend (I can say that, since I am the one who proposed 'multisend'). And you, what do you prefer? 'multisend' or 'recurring send'?
Mintcoin uses the term "recurringsend" instead of S4C.
That got me thinking. What about changing the proposed name "multisend" for "recurring send" (at first, I proposed recurring payment", but payment is only one kind of sending as examplified by the HyperSend page? It fits the principle of least astonishment (POLA) much more appealing than multisend (I can say that, since I am the one who proposed 'multisend'). And you, what do you prefer? 'multisend' or 'recurring send'?
Jump to: