I believe that both jonald_fyookball and Lauda have frequently posted manipulative or misleading posts and threads.
I highly disagree. I'd welcome a PM pointing out such posts.
Having looked through your posts from the last few weeks I've decided that I was wrong. However, I still think that your posts are excessively blunt rather than using normal justification (e.g. saying "outright lie" a lot, arguably arguments by assertion or at least unnecessarily adding assertions).
However when being this active, biases become very clear after a while, and Lauda needs to recognise those biases by removing the negative trust on jonald_fyookball and on BITMAIN.
No. There is no bias. Both ratings are perfectly valid.
BITMAIN is a private company, suggesting something bad. While UAHF would be BITMAIN-dominated, it's something which would require wider economic support to become relevant, and it shouldn't therefore be considered a direct "attack" on Bitcoin - just BITMAIN going off and doing something dumb. A negative rating there is about opinion more than any thing else.
In jonald's case, he makes misleading posts which people often make in the context of an argument and an ongoing heated debate. To discredit his username personally because of this I think is abuse of your power.
Lauda can make points about Quickseller's hypocrisy all they want, and they make some level of sense. But they don't actually contradict his point, they just show further biases.
Completely wrong. QS aims to imply that holding/processing a lot of money means that you're trustworthy, whilst trying to smear my name (someone is also holding/processing a lot of money; obviously not the same amount as BITMAIN).
It does make you trustworthy if it's suggesting that you held a lot of money without scamming people. Holding money without scamming people is not the same as holding money.
It sounds a lot like this is more evidence that Lauda is leaving negative trust against those who do not share similar opinions with him in an effort to censor their opinions and viewpoints.
That would only make sense IF I had stated something like that, and then proceed to leave ratings to "censor" (this isn't censorship in any way or form) these people. Scammers like you truly live in in their delusions.
It's not censorship in that it doesn't prevent them from posting their views elsewhere, but it is a means of manipulating people's views about what the Bitcoin community wants or why they want it.
Jonald does this by making unjustified statements about what the community believes, but this is different as he is not in a position of power.
