Topic: I am being given neg feedback for political reasons - page 4. (Read 3650 times)

Yes it is not necessary and there is no reason for anyone to think I've sold my account.   In fact, i'm a little tired of these silly argument by assertions.

But since I offered, the first address is signed with a message "jf-6-11-2017"

HGcmK97jOH6XtCOT0wIYKYxtXu7C7RdXZKu6WtnpjZWNNRHl1ic+VlmengWVAn3S9QRd8UYRKRXsaHISWMlLorY=

Apparently, according to him, my rating even got him banned!

We also know a certain someone that once said he'd leave Bitcointalk but never did. I'll give you a small hint, he is really quick at selling.

Reddit is very useless due to simple manipulation (e.g. vote brigading). Don't you dare mention Bitcoin Core in a positive tone on Bitcoin.com.

Quite recently, you were claiming that Lauda and Theymos are the same person.  What changed?

You said that ages ago.  Have you really?
How interesting that you said "other forums", instead of naming one.  That's because there aren't any really good Bitcoin forums or places for discussion.  Bitcoin.com is weak and Reddit is much worse than here.

I do not.

Blazr is a DT account held by Quickseller. It has nothing to do with this.

Fixed that for you. Goodbye.

30 day ban is up,  

@Lauda, I was going to try and reason with you about the False Negative Feedback you left me.
But after seeing this topic , there is no point. You will never learn.

Theymos sits on his hands and does absolutely nothing
while you continue to abuse his pathetically designed trust system.

So I will probably just say to hell with btctalk and use other forums, since this design is abusive and stupid and mistreats others with no probably cause.

I just leave you a goodbye poem, as you are no longer worth my time.
A Parting Farewell Poem for Lauda (Since you like Phillp K. Dick so much.)

Blazed, you gave Lauda the Power to abuse a Trust System
Abuse it she does day or night , even in the Grey of twilight.

Many fools believe Lauda is on a holy mission ,
to those fools she is like a Laudanum that dulls their pathetic senses.

The Genderfluid idiots, an Alex/Alexis follow Lauda because they are too stupid to think for themselves.
@Lauda, for you and you alone, in this poem is a hidden meaning, do you see, do you understand,
that in the Great Scheme of things your petty machinations(False Trust Ratings) and pretense of being a man,
that the collusions of the mods / Theymos minions have Never Deterred my Opinion.

You are an abuser of Theymos False Design , and have used it to have others Ban anothers time.
But as your march toward your corrupt signature destination continues, every step leads your False Reputation to disintegration.
So as this poem designed just for you concludes, it's hidden meaning Shines Through.

Goodbye Lauda, Enjoy destroying everything Theymos worked for.

Kiklo has Left the Building!

 

I was banned, albeit not for what you claim that I did.

I find it highly disappointing of myself that I even considered helping you correct your trust rating. It seems that I should be less inclined to help individuals around here.

Oh you DO ..do you ?

What like the one you left me for being a pedophile for admitting i downloaded porn on RARBG like millions of others ?

You guys dog piled in after (donator) Kluge + his puppet sent me a death threat with a brand new puppet account. (titled SpoetnikIsFucked)
I have been harassed for years by you all who don't like my "FUD" so you simply make shit up and trash my rating.

Interesting point here is VOD had flipped out on me before when i posted a topic about File Sharing in off topic.. he is anti-piracy and went off on me over it. (HIS REF LINK FOR BEING A PEDO IN MY RATING)

Like being on Welfare you claimed ? (i think a rumor whispered in his ear he used to neg me with)
How could you prove i was or was not ?
You can't ..but negged me anyway.  

And the funny part is..
He had never said a word to me in a bad way over the years until..
I cracked a joke insulting people from where he's from (Alberta Canada)

He then went ape shit and kept showing up in the Altcoin section stiring the pot and trying to get me to DOXX myself by answering questions about where i work etc.. (so he have more to troll on me with)
And surprise surprise Lauda Popped up defending his troll commentary every time simultaneously.
The two of you did that in Alt / main for 2 whole months.. trolling around holding hands.. immune to a ban.

I kept asking how he can get away with it and he called me a whiner.
Me ? I would have been banned !
Neither of those two have spent any time in the ALT section at least since mid 2013 roughly.
They showed up to harras me then left again.

He only accused me of being a pedo when i said you wanna troll me and start shit ?
And i said how about YOUR Pedo report online ? (that is actually very real)
THEN.. and ONLY THEN did he neg me accusing me of the same thing AFTER the FACT.
http://www.ripoffreport.com/r/Martin-Lawrence/Select-StateProvince/Martin-Lawrence-vodmlawrence-pedo-bitcoin-St-Albert-Edmonton-St-Albert-Alberta-1158255

So.. yeah..
I always find it funny how the little crusaders here are the worst violators.
Lauda booted off staff and VOD being a rampant troll etc etc..
All of you abusing the living shit out of the Trust rating system as an attack tool, simply to retaliate at others "you don't like"

My trust is fine.
I have had a flawless record trading and even had a positive rating backing it up until Kluge threatened me with a hitman and the Monero assholes came after me etc etc.
I have never been caught being "dishonest" ..ever !

Problem is a few of you are shallow worthless little losers and your lives revolve around this place.. and playing moderator.
And being on DT is your big jerk-off wank fest.

Me ? I'd never get on DT because i have always been outspoken.
Which gets you negged hard.

Want a good rating.. suck a lot of cock.. simple.
Me ? Not happening LOL
Fuck you stupid losers.. like a give a fuck what a bunch of douche bags on the internet think of me.

Every neg i get is simply a permanent excuse to rail on about their stupidity.
It affords me the chance to shine the spot-light on their idiocy.
And i enjoy it  

Do it more pricks ahhahaha  

@OP
You just realized NOW these are all hypocrite losers ?  

Aww won't you all be Bitcointalk-friends with me ? I'm lonely and have no friends  

We could do that; not that it's necessary. Try this one: 1Fr2qUpHkyyuxmz5APz7ViCp2rM8zRU5ho or 1KcofPMDKQyR87MYxkHFcqf6vJzXPJyxV2.

Yeah.. no. The supermajority of users is with status-quo on any non-BU "community". All long-standing names on IRC et. al. support them and the node count of (emphasis on) aged nodes reflects that.

Repetitively attempting to smear my name with the usage of 'shill', more specifically a "Blockstream shill" has nothing to with what you just wrote. If you can provide proof for these claims, then go ahead. If not, then yes, you are guilty.

They were not full.

I have not claimed such a thing and if it looks that I have, then those few posts got out of control.

You were most certainly not right in anything.

"You" (just like everyone else) wanted a *solution* to scaling. Solution is provided. Now you claim it is a "narrative shift"?

There is no such thing as "Blockstream/Core".

feel free to find an old address, i'll likely be able to sign a message, not that I need to prove anything.

the only thing that's changed is the blocksize debate.  I was honest and/or clear thinking enough to see the truth and you aren't apparently.  The funny thing is, almost everyone outside of this forum and r/bitcoin thinks core is full of crap.  Yet, you persist with supporting their indefensible positions and ludicrous arguments.   If pointing that out counts in your mind as 'defamation' then guilty as charged. lol

I'm pretty sure i could go back and find a dozen posts where you tried to argue blocks weren't full , aren't getting full...as they clearly were...now that fees have exploded, instead of acknowledging that people like me were right all along, the narrative shifts to "well we need segwit" etc.... its such an obvious ruse and you are willingly going along with it for whatever reason.  Maybe you've been brainwashed, maybe you worship Greg, maybe you're just choosing to be sinister... I really don't know or care...but I do know Blockstream/Core is full of crap, they do not have Bitcoin's best interest in mind, and they are liars.

I guess we could arrange that. Albeit the repetitive, unproven defamatory statements are one of the main motivators behind his ratings. There are no "politics". There is a simple way to correct his error(s), but of course the user would rather create trouble than tranquility. This can be noticed by occasional spiking in thread creation. The defamation he continues to do in this very thread.

1) I have absolutely no idea why Gmaxwell left you his rating.
2) My rating is absolutely not related to your dispute with Gmaxwell, nor to any kind of "political reasons".
3) You have proven nothing besides the continuation of your defamatory attempts.
4) The very same disruption that I've mentioned, you persist in causing.

It doesn't sound like you're the same person. Then again, some may suspect this account to be sold (which may or may not be true).

Absolute lie.

Whether a scammer trusts someone or not is of vital importance. Absolutely pathetic statements.

Which is not something that I have done. Ironically, the exact same thing what you're describing now was done by you to tspacepilot (when he first exposed you IIRC).

---

The sole reason for which mister Quickseller wants me out of DT is because that would void a unknown number of my ratings on scammers and various types of account trafficking. Of which the latter are his business. This includes, but is not limited to, selling DT accounts to scammers.

I would suggest that you make it known and public that blazed is the one effectively allowing this kind of ratings as he is the reason why lauda (an extortionist) is in the DT network.

Once the above has been addressed m, I would advise doing the same thing with theymos regarding nullc.

Lauda is absolutely not someone who should be in any position of power and/or discretion as he has proven himself to lack any kind of ethics and/or morals. I would absolutely not trust him nor would I advise others doing the same.

Lauda is allowed to have his own opinion, however using his position of power to attempt to silence and/or discredit those who disagree with him and speak out against him is absolutely not okay.

No your are not a scammer, the feedback from lauda is really irrelevant in terms of what he tried to depict Jonald as. Its a matter of shame that Lauda does it so many times.

One thing i would like to share for power abusers not targeting anyone: In life if you become so arrogant then people who are hurt with your act will start looking out for you in real and the consequences you know...Moreover the matter here is reputation and Bitcoin ($$$$). Think many time how much a person can go to purse his intention.

Privacy over Internet is a Myth My friend, just google yourself.

I just want to add, for anyone reading this -- that I had positive green trust for years (thanks to reasonable people like Vod) before Greg decided it would
be a good idea to abuse the trust system.  He hates the fact that I write articles exposing his lies and schemes.

You know this Lauda, which makes my point about you being a shill proven correct once again.

Nice try to paint me as a possible scammer when everyone who's been around here a long time
knows I'm one of the least likely people to scam.
 
Since you call my character into question, i'll mention specifically:

- I lent long time member Arklan 0.5 BTC , no interest no collateral when he was out of work
- I lent Dobbs 0.5 BTC, no interest no collateral when his wallet was hacked a week before his wedding
- I GAVE BurtW's daughter 0.5 BTC (gave not lent) after DHS thugs robbed her piggybank.

See, that's the kind of person I am.  I try to help people. 

You, Lauda, are the kind of sleaze that aligns yourself with Greg Maxwell,
a proven liar and you shill constantly for Blockstream, truly the Monsanto of Bitcoin.

The negative trust from you guys doesn't bother me at all - I look at it as proof I'm doing something right.  It's just another tool for me to expose you.
 

I feel a reference link is needed, even if a summation needs to be created.

Very politely is too much(and redundant).
And you just proved him right by starting this thread.


Fyookballs, if you intend to do this I will recommend you doing it now. AFAIK there is a waiting list in Lauda's inbox.

The Dragon and the Tiger(YinYang). Lauda's cat. :p

Why?? fyookballs was funny with the avatar O.0\ he looks really harmless to me. if there are people in DT list from both sides of the argument then I don't see any strict censorship. if you do this to all of Wu's ninjas then he might release the dragon.

I did ask Greg very politely and got a hateful reply. 

If people choose not to trust you based on your political beliefs then they are free to do so. They are also free to show this through the trust system on Bitcointalk.

The best way to go about removing it is either ask them nicely, rather than insulting them, or contact the people that put them on DT2 to have them removed. Asking for trust won't help at all.

QFR

This is often heard from people who are going attempt to scam later. This does not sound good, at all. I suggest that you remove it.

Quoted for reference. Defamation at its finest..