Pages:
Author

Topic: I dont pay loan but guy take collateral worth 3 times more and call me scammer - page 2. (Read 1758 times)

legendary
Activity: 2632
Merit: 1094
You know the meaning of a loan first of all?

If give take a loan from the bank of $1000 and give my property worth triple the amount and then don't pay the loan, the bank has a right to take over my property. As simple as it sound and then I cannot go about complaining to the bank to give me back my property. It's gone.

You dint lose 0.2 BTC but it's a term set by the loan giver that you agreed to. You dint fulfill the terms and hence the loss. There's nothing to complain and leave negative feedback to the loan giver. It's your fault to not payback the loan.
full member
Activity: 124
Merit: 100
I think he is saying that he should not be labeled a scammer. He doesn't appear to be complaining about loosing the value of his collateral.

yep thats what i think hes saying too, he had collateral so how is he a scammer?

It's possible 'scammer' is not the right word to use (that's arguable) but OP is definitely untrustworthy. The deal was not selling the account for 0.1 BTC, OP agreed to repay the loan and if he doesn't repay it then he's not respecting his own word. I would never trust or deal with a user whose word is worthless.

Besides that a big issue with OP is his trust abuse:

Yeah, I wouldn't say he's a scammer. He secured the loan so nothing was scammed. Like op is complaining about it's actually good for the lender he didn't/can't repay because he can make much profit on the account. Op has nothing to complain about in this regard because he offered it as collateral and knew the terms.

True Irfan got a good profit but therr is no reason for him to give his account back. Also calling scammer when a person do a quick-sale via loan is not a recent thing After all, it is a loan not a sale. I can correct the word in negative feedback if someone tells me more appropriate word which I can agree with.

I dont care what you think. He earn on this loan 300% this is not normal. I lost 0.2BTC or even more and you told i not be trusted  what is wrong with you guys.
And im not scammer.

It doesn't matter if he earned 300% on the collateral - you didn't pay your loan on time and you didn't have an agreement for him to refund the excess value to you.  Keep in mind the value of the collateral could have dropped as well (scam accusations on account), in which case you wouldn't be complaining, right?

I'm ok with using your terminology - what do you want to call yourself seeing you failed to pay back a loan as promised?



You shouldnt call him anything, what if he had problems to pay the loan, wich he obviously did, you cant know what happened exactly. If someone does not pay a loan because he simply cannot i wouldnt call him a scammer, if he doesnt pay it because HE DOESNT WANT TO, now thats a different story

If he can't pay, he should tell it before due date. He obviously avoided it and now asking account back realizing the value.
I dont want my account back. I think if he earn on this loan everything is ok. But i saw that he call me scammer.I never was scammer and i don't care what you tell. You always take thread from wrong site. If your friend dont tell how it was please dont to rate me wrong. Im not scammer andi dont abusting trust feedback(they call me scammer im not scammer that why respond on red feedback). First time i have situation like this. People here are really strange. In normal world if you earn 200% on loan this is ok and you dont have pretense.
sr. member
Activity: 322
Merit: 250
https://dadice.com | Click my signature to join!
I think he is saying that he should not be labeled a scammer. He doesn't appear to be complaining about loosing the value of his collateral.

yep thats what i think hes saying too, he had collateral so how is he a scammer?

It's possible 'scammer' is not the right word to use (that's arguable) but OP is definitely untrustworthy. The deal was not selling the account for 0.1 BTC, OP agreed to repay the loan and if he doesn't repay it then he's not respecting his own word. I would never trust or deal with a user whose word is worthless.

Besides that a big issue with OP is his trust abuse:

Yeah, I wouldn't say he's a scammer. He secured the loan so nothing was scammed. Like op is complaining about it's actually good for the lender he didn't/can't repay because he can make much profit on the account. Op has nothing to complain about in this regard because he offered it as collateral and knew the terms.

True Irfan got a good profit but therr is no reason for him to give his account back. Also calling scammer when a person do a quick-sale via loan is not a recent thing After all, it is a loan not a sale. I can correct the word in negative feedback if someone tells me more appropriate word which I can agree with.

Have you considered putting it as plain as Defaulted borrower? IMO, If you think it is not being clear enough you could still rephrasing it as Untrustworthy defaulted borrower. Just my 2 satoshi, however.

I dont care what you think. He earn on this loan 300% this is not normal. I lost 0.2BTC or even more and you told i not be trusted  what is wrong with you guys.
And im not scammer.

It doesn't matter if he earned 300% on the collateral - you didn't pay your loan on time and you didn't have an agreement for him to refund the excess value to you.  Keep in mind the value of the collateral could have dropped as well (scam accusations on account), in which case you wouldn't be complaining, right?

I'm ok with using your terminology - what do you want to call yourself seeing you failed to pay back a loan as promised?



You shouldnt call him anything, what if he had problems to pay the loan, wich he obviously did, you cant know what happened exactly. If someone does not pay a loan because he simply cannot i wouldnt call him a scammer, if he doesnt pay it because HE DOESNT WANT TO, now thats a different story

If he can't pay, he should tell it before due date. He obviously avoided it and now asking account back realizing the value.

+1. I think also that BitcoinBoss666 abusing trust feedbacks to retaliate & silence people here not agreeing with him, e.g. like you or EcuaMobi, only make him look more untrustworthy than ever. Screenshot to preserve evidence, here: http://gyazo.com/90e3f9bce587390c1625aed922f9eae7
hero member
Activity: 560
Merit: 509
I prefer Zakir over Muhammed when mentioning me!
I think he is saying that he should not be labeled a scammer. He doesn't appear to be complaining about loosing the value of his collateral.

yep thats what i think hes saying too, he had collateral so how is he a scammer?

It's possible 'scammer' is not the right word to use (that's arguable) but OP is definitely untrustworthy. The deal was not selling the account for 0.1 BTC, OP agreed to repay the loan and if he doesn't repay it then he's not respecting his own word. I would never trust or deal with a user whose word is worthless.

Besides that a big issue with OP is his trust abuse:

Yeah, I wouldn't say he's a scammer. He secured the loan so nothing was scammed. Like op is complaining about it's actually good for the lender he didn't/can't repay because he can make much profit on the account. Op has nothing to complain about in this regard because he offered it as collateral and knew the terms.

True Irfan got a good profit but therr is no reason for him to give his account back. Also calling scammer when a person do a quick-sale via loan is not a recent thing After all, it is a loan not a sale. I can correct the word in negative feedback if someone tells me more appropriate word which I can agree with.

I dont care what you think. He earn on this loan 300% this is not normal. I lost 0.2BTC or even more and you told i not be trusted  what is wrong with you guys.
And im not scammer.

It doesn't matter if he earned 300% on the collateral - you didn't pay your loan on time and you didn't have an agreement for him to refund the excess value to you.  Keep in mind the value of the collateral could have dropped as well (scam accusations on account), in which case you wouldn't be complaining, right?

I'm ok with using your terminology - what do you want to call yourself seeing you failed to pay back a loan as promised?



You shouldnt call him anything, what if he had problems to pay the loan, wich he obviously did, you cant know what happened exactly. If someone does not pay a loan because he simply cannot i wouldnt call him a scammer, if he doesnt pay it because HE DOESNT WANT TO, now thats a different story

If he can't pay, he should tell it before due date. He obviously avoided it and now asking account back realizing the value.
hero member
Activity: 1064
Merit: 505
I dont care what you think. He earn on this loan 300% this is not normal. I lost 0.2BTC or even more and you told i not be trusted  what is wrong with you guys.
And im not scammer.

It doesn't matter if he earned 300% on the collateral - you didn't pay your loan on time and you didn't have an agreement for him to refund the excess value to you.  Keep in mind the value of the collateral could have dropped as well (scam accusations on account), in which case you wouldn't be complaining, right?

I'm ok with using your terminology - what do you want to call yourself seeing you failed to pay back a loan as promised?



You shouldnt call him anything, what if he had problems to pay the loan, wich he obviously did, you cant know what happened exactly. If someone does not pay a loan because he simply cannot i wouldnt call him a scammer, if he doesnt pay it because HE DOESNT WANT TO, now thats a different story
global moderator
Activity: 3990
Merit: 2717
Join the world-leading crypto sportsbook NOW!
I think he is saying that he should not be labeled a scammer. He doesn't appear to be complaining about loosing the value of his collateral.

yep thats what i think hes saying too, he had collateral so how is he a scammer?

It's possible 'scammer' is not the right word to use (that's arguable) but OP is definitely untrustworthy. The deal was not selling the account for 0.1 BTC, OP agreed to repay the loan and if he doesn't repay it then he's not respecting his own word. I would never trust or deal with a user whose word is worthless.

Besides that a big issue with OP is his trust abuse:

Yeah, I wouldn't say he's a scammer. He secured the loan so nothing was scammed. Like op is complaining about it's actually good for the lender he didn't/can't repay because he can make much profit on the account. Op has nothing to complain about in this regard because he offered it as collateral and knew the terms.
Vod
legendary
Activity: 3668
Merit: 3010
Licking my boob since 1970
I dont care what you think. He earn on this loan 300% this is not normal. I lost 0.2BTC or even more and you told i not be trusted  what is wrong with you guys.
And im not scammer.

It doesn't matter if he earned 300% on the collateral - you didn't pay your loan on time and you didn't have an agreement for him to refund the excess value to you.  Keep in mind the value of the collateral could have dropped as well (scam accusations on account), in which case you wouldn't be complaining, right?

I'm ok with using your terminology - what do you want to call yourself seeing you failed to pay back a loan as promised?

full member
Activity: 124
Merit: 100
I think he is saying that he should not be labeled a scammer. He doesn't appear to be complaining about loosing the value of his collateral.

yep thats what i think hes saying too, he had collateral so how is he a scammer?

It's possible 'scammer' is not the right word to use (that's arguable) but OP is definitely untrustworthy. The deal was not selling the account for 0.1 BTC, OP agreed to repay the loan and if he doesn't repay it then he's not respecting his own word. I would never trust or deal with a user whose word is worthless.

Besides that a big issue with OP is his trust abuse:

  • He added a negative feedback to the loaner even though OP was the one who disrespected their agreement.
  • I, Vod and MZ left a negative feedback to OP because he defaulted the loan. After reading other people's opinion I was in doubt so I removed my feedback. However afterwards OP left a negative feedback in my profile with a lie:
    Quote
    He give me negative trust becouse some user earn 0.2BTC on my loan
    Obviously the reason for the negative feedback I left and removed was because OP defaulted his loan and didn't follow the agreed contract. It was not because "some user earn 0.2BTC".

I was in doubt for a while but with this behavior I confirmed OP should not be trusted.


I dont care what you think. He earn on this loan 300% this is not normal. I lost 0.2BTC or even more and you told i not be trusted  what is wrong with you guys.
And im not scammer.
legendary
Activity: 1876
Merit: 1475
I think he is saying that he should not be labeled a scammer. He doesn't appear to be complaining about loosing the value of his collateral.

yep thats what i think hes saying too, he had collateral so how is he a scammer?

It's possible 'scammer' is not the right word to use (that's arguable) but OP is definitely untrustworthy. The deal was not selling the account for 0.1 BTC, OP agreed to repay the loan and if he doesn't repay it then he's not respecting his own word. I would never trust or deal with a user whose word is worthless.

Besides that a big issue with OP is his trust abuse:

  • He added a negative feedback to the loaner even though OP was the one who disrespected their agreement.
  • I, Vod and MZ left a negative feedback to OP because he defaulted the loan. After reading other people's opinion I was in doubt so I removed my feedback. However afterwards OP left a negative feedback in my profile with a lie:
    Quote
    He give me negative trust becouse some user earn 0.2BTC on my loan
    Obviously the reason for the negative feedback I left and removed was because OP defaulted his loan and didn't follow the agreed contract. It was not because "some user earn 0.2BTC".

I was in doubt for a while but with this behavior I confirmed OP should not be trusted.

legendary
Activity: 2240
Merit: 1001
I think he is saying that he should not be labeled a scammer. He doesn't appear to be complaining about loosing the value of his collateral.

yep thats what i think hes saying too, he had collateral so how is he a scammer?
copper member
Activity: 2996
Merit: 2374
I think he is saying that he should not be labeled a scammer. He doesn't appear to be complaining about loosing the value of his collateral.
sr. member
Activity: 322
Merit: 250
https://dadice.com | Click my signature to join!
I take 0.1BtC loan and give my account as collateral(account worth 3 times more).
I dont pay loan becouse i have some problem and this guy call me scammer.
After he call me scammer i want to buy my account back becouse after i dont pay loan i think everything was ok.
When quicksilver tell true about this situation that guy close thread(https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.11375815 link to thread).
Im not scammer i never scam nobody. That guy earn 0.2BTC or more on this loan. Please be careful if you want take loan(from irfan_pak10) or use escrow(Muhammed Zakir)
I am just angry becouse i never scam nobody and dont pay loan if you have collateral is not scam for me. This guy irfan was really not nice for me.
He can scam in future with no problem.

1st: Cool you off. Being angry led to poor decisions.
2nd: You took a loan with collateral; then, You had not repaid the loan on due date so relinquishing your collateral to lender.
3rd: You (the borrower) & irfan_pak10 (the lender) agreed to loan terms; so, what all the fuss over it?
4th: I really miss the reason over MZ's scamming you; also, the trust you left to MZ & EcuaMobi may amount to abuse of the trust feedback.


Take care.
 Wink
Vod
legendary
Activity: 3668
Merit: 3010
Licking my boob since 1970
Vod i dont agreed with you, but what i can do? He earn on this loan 0.2BTC or more and this is fact.
Btw:thx for red trust i really dont care.

There is nothing you can do.

Next time you make a loan and plan to default, make an agreement that any excess funds from the sale of the collateral be returned to you.   Undecided
full member
Activity: 124
Merit: 100
Vod i dont agreed with you, but what i can do? He earn on this loan 0.2BTC or more and this is fact.
Btw:thx for red trust i really dont care.
Vod
legendary
Activity: 3668
Merit: 3010
Licking my boob since 1970
I take 0.1BtC loan and give my account as collateral(account worth 3 times more).
I dont pay loan becouse i have some problem and this guy call me scammer.
After he call me scammer i want to buy my account back becouse after i dont pay loan i think everything was ok.
When quicksilver tell true about this situation that guy close thread(https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.11375815 link to thread).
Im not scammer i never scam nobody. That guy earn 0.2BTC or more on this loan. Please be careful if you want take loan(from irfan_pak10) or use escrow(Muhammed Zakir)
I am just angry becouse i never scam nobody and dont pay loan if you have collateral is not scam for me. This guy irfan was really not nice for me.
He can scam in future with no problem.

As far as I know, you surrendered your collateral when you didn't pay your loan back (problems are irrelevant).

There was no agreement to refund part of the collateral if it exceeded the loan amount.

Perhaps this is something you can agree on in the future, but for this issue, it's wrapped up.
full member
Activity: 124
Merit: 100
I take 0.1BtC loan and give my account as collateral(account worth 3 times more).
I dont pay loan becouse i have some problem and this guy call me scammer.
After he call me scammer i want to buy my account back becouse after i dont pay loan i think everything was ok.
When quicksilver tell true about this situation that guy close thread(https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.11375815 link to thread).
Im not scammer i never scam nobody. That guy earn 0.2BTC or more on this loan. Please be careful if you want take loan(from irfan_pak10) or use escrow(Muhammed Zakir)
I am just angry becouse i never scam nobody and dont pay loan if you have collateral is not scam for me. This guy irfan was really not nice for me.
He can scam in future with no problem.
Pages:
Jump to: