Topic: I doubt it - But is it too bad to ask you to review some of my posts? - page 3. (Read 594 times)

Yep, and I probably didn't convey that sentiment in my previous post, but it's quite true.  Your posts might still be of the same quality, but many members with merits to give away (including me, which I did say) do look at someone's merit count when they're deciding whether they're going to give someone merits.

That's just the way it is, and I think it's a good way to use the merit system.  Merits are more than just a thumbs-up or a like; they're the mechanism by which people rank up here, so giving them to someone who already has enough to make Legendary might be considered to be squandering those sMerits.

Note: I'm totally guilty of violating what I just wrote, many times over.  But as a merit source I've usually got plenty of sMerits to hand out.  *And speaking of that, I think I'll now get back to my extensive waiting list of members wanting post reviews*

Edit: Shitsky!!  I didn't realize how low I was running on sMerits, and I just handed out my last one while doing reviews.  If anyone who's still waiting for a review sees this, please be patient as I have to wait until my source allocation gets re-upped.   *eeek!*

What is happening to you is normal and also happened to me and many others. Simply when you are ranking up, many forum mates tend to give you more merits to help you reach the ranks. Once you have the necessary merits to reach legendary, that extra push stops.

Now you have to adapt to the new situation and try to earn merits that way.

You may be right, but supporting each other in the community on quality posts is not going to be wrong behavior and against the rules. There are many users helping other users to get rank, this also happened in my local board section. They help not out of pity, but they help because they know that those who are being helped are users whose posts are of good quality. But something can also happen as you say. But one thing, you will get a much higher amount of merit if you have two things. Firstly you are HQ poster and secondly you are well known among the community.

But the merit system doesn't only apply to those who need a rank, I mean the merit system is always expected to be useful for whoever they are even though their rank is stuck (Legendary). I also sometimes feel that my contributions just ignored, and actually I can say a lot of users also miss my posts which are basically of a quality (sometimes better than some of the other most merit users on my local board). But it's just my feeling, maybe because they think that I'm Legendary.

But I once hoped that this mindset would change soon because the merit had to flow between all ranks even if they were Legendary. They should care enough about contributors instead of just helping other people or some users who are climbing up the rankings. You know, in the past I wish someone/a few people also reviewed my post because I thought a lot of local users of my board just ignored me. Check there.

There are merit black holes which drain out healthy smerits then exchange smerits back and forth to rank up. Let they do their jobs and I don't mind to engage with their jobs but your concern is valid and it has happened many months already. It started to be worse since the day theymos increased monthly smerit allocation.

Nowadays, it's easily to see Members, Full members with very good earned merit stats but if you look at their merit histories, I am sure you will see how they exchanged merits with Bitcointalk Merit Public Ledger.

Needless to say who they are and I hope that campaign managers will pay attention on that. Because their main reasons to do that is to rank up and join campaigns. Unfortunately, by inorganic rank-ups they will not be able to make good quality posts that are harmful and negatively constructive for their campaigns.

What a pity to see they exploited generosity and sympathy of higher ranked members to rank up with not too good quality posts, then use smerit they got for their own merit cycles.

I believe they are able to rank up organically but it takes more time. However, it is what they should do to play fair in this community.

Maybe this is the actual accumulated amount if you never asked for "rank boost" in the first place. Since you have reached the highest rank, things will return to normal mode which is enough to prove how high your visibility has been.

Now I understand the point of theymos suggesting good stuff like you pointed out, he just doesn't want users to be shocked by the reality later on that worry becomes a reason to get discouraged.

I don't fully know what you're worried about because actually you no longer need merit to rank up. But maybe, you expect some people to appreciate your post which I don't think is bad either. You've made good contributions as a cheater hunter as well as a spam busters, and you should have no trouble getting some merit with of that activity. But you definitely know that the quality of posts is very subjective between one user and another, so this can sometimes affect the amount of merit you can earning in a certain time period.

Don't worry about the amount of merit your earn, it only gets better the more patterned and balanced your contributions are. Sometimes it's hard to explain why one and two great posts don't yield any merit, it's just a matter of liking or disliking someone about the quality of your post. I am not merit source, but I can help you some merit.

Advice: If you want to contribute more to the merit system, I think you should also apply as a merit source.

Based on how you post you are good enough to get merits, but if you're asking if it's too much I think not at all Theymos add the word there is a parameter he sets in, if he means that no begging of merits he will just post
.
But You should be confident enough about your post's history that those who will grant your request will not waste their time.

There is a thin line between requesting and begging, so you should be imaginative about on how you do it  

If I'm not mistaken (I haven't checked BPIP), I've given you a number of merits over the past couple of years.  If you didn't already have enough merits to reach Legendary rank, I'd be happy to do a post history review for you--although there's a long waiting list and I'm still short on sMerits.  I can only speak for myself, but I try to reserve my merit-giving for those members who need them in order to rank up.  Not everyone agrees with that style, but perhaps some do, which would explain why you haven't been receiving as many as you usually do.

And I also have to add: since you do indeed have enough merits to get to the last rank, why fret about it?  We've all got different perspectives on the merit system, but I'd suggest not using it as a yardstick for your value to the forum.  I haven't been getting nearly the number of merits I used to get, but that's A-OK with me, as I don't need them and it's not a competition for me.

Also, if you're a high-ranking member such as yourself you probably don't want to be starting up threads like this.  It just doesn't feel right IMO.

try asking The Sceptical Chymist, I remember seeing a thread of his several weeks ago where he reviews a member's post history, perhaps he can give you some advice or pointers as to why you're not getting much merit after reaching the 1k merits mark.

I looked for the thread but it was locked and had "paused" on the title.
[Paused] Rules for my post history review offer *updated*

You write well, though my accessing your post might not be the same as others, everyone have their own ways of evaluating your post.
The only thing I noticed was just that you feels more relaxed after achieving 1000 merits which makes you Legendary rank and having this mind you have not to stress yourself putting efforts to earn merits like other.
 
But truth be told, I have seen few users that have backslided after getting the required merits for the higher rank they wishes.
Besides, your pressure can't be quantified with those with lower ranks who are fighting every day to day making sure to achieved their desires of either becoming Full member, or Sr members and I noticed this are the people putting more fire 🔥 to get Hero and Legendary rank.

In conclusion, there's nothing wrong with your post, rather you got relaxed after getting the required merits for Legendary. So to keep earning merits you need to put more fire and action on your posts. Although lower ranks post with desperacy for them to earn merits.

Seems like the title of the thread pretty much represents how I'm feeling right now, but let me ask if that's even possible?

I have somehow lost a lot of merit income since I made my first 1000 merit. I don't know if the quality of my posts is really bad or most people don't like my post style. In fact, I just realized that I only have earn 28 merit in the last 120 days or 36 merit in 150 days. Of course it's wonder when I actually post something that seems a bit less garbage/ spamming ^{[in my opinion]} than many of today's gambling posters.

Of course I recognize that there are several thread that might be useful when I feel my submission is worth reporting to the merit sources for review, but I'm really having a hard time deciding which one is worthy of your acceptance. This made me decide to create this one thread, but not for the purpose of begging you. But to be honest sometimes I have to skip a lot of posts when I don't have any sMerit to give to others.

So let me ask, was it really too much when I asked some of you to review my post and drop some merit there if you find something worthy? I hope this isn't a excessively attempt to do instead of sending you an unsolicited PM.

Theymos said: