i found satoshi nakamoto | Bitcointalksearch.org

futureofbitcoin

sr. member

Activity: 322

Merit: 250

Quote from: Joe_Bauers on April 30, 2015, 12:18:22 PM

Quote from: futureofbitcoin on April 30, 2015, 11:58:40 AM

Quote from: Joe_Bauers on April 30, 2015, 11:13:44 AM

Quote

, but there is still the unbelievable perfect source code of version 0.01.

If the source code was perfect, we wouldn't be at version 0.10.1 Wink

Looking at the source code, to me, makes it pretty evident who wrote it. One of the main reasons that I am assuming Satoshi left is she was not liking the "godliness" that members of the community we starting to attribute to her.

I find extremely annoying the people who go out of their way to use "her" or "she" instead of "him" or "he". Seriously.

It's especially stupid when Satoshi is clearly a male name.

The only thing clear about Satoshi's name is that it's a pseudonym Wink

Sorry to ruin the idea that your "god" Satoshi is clearly a man.

P.S. Not really, your annoyance shows you are another cog in the worldly wheel of problems.

As expected, pitiful ad hominem attacks based on logical fallacies, and this sense of self-righteousness, thinking you can judge everyone else, calling other people problems without looking at yourself. Thinking you are somehow a better human being by being "fair" and using "she"/"her", despite the fact that the name is a male one.

Quite typical.

R2D221

hero member

Activity: 658

Merit: 500

Quote from: Joe_Bauers on April 30, 2015, 12:18:22 PM

The only thing clear about Satoshi's name is that it's a pseudonym.

Yes, but it's a male pseudonym. As long as we don't have more information about this person, the right thing is to refer to him as a male.

Joe_Bauers

hero member

Activity: 802

Merit: 1003

GCVMMWH

Quote from: futureofbitcoin on April 30, 2015, 11:58:40 AM

Quote from: Joe_Bauers on April 30, 2015, 11:13:44 AM

Quote

, but there is still the unbelievable perfect source code of version 0.01.

If the source code was perfect, we wouldn't be at version 0.10.1 Wink

Looking at the source code, to me, makes it pretty evident who wrote it. One of the main reasons that I am assuming Satoshi left is she was not liking the "godliness" that members of the community we starting to attribute to her.

I find extremely annoying the people who go out of their way to use "her" or "she" instead of "him" or "he". Seriously.

It's especially stupid when Satoshi is clearly a male name.

The only thing clear about Satoshi's name is that it's a pseudonym Wink

Sorry to ruin the idea that your "god" Satoshi is clearly a man.

P.S. Not really, your annoyance shows you are another cog in the worldly wheel of problems.

futureofbitcoin

sr. member

Activity: 322

Merit: 250

Quote from: Joe_Bauers on April 30, 2015, 11:13:44 AM

Quote

, but there is still the unbelievable perfect source code of version 0.01.

If the source code was perfect, we wouldn't be at version 0.10.1 Wink

Looking at the source code, to me, makes it pretty evident who wrote it. One of the main reasons that I am assuming Satoshi left is she was not liking the "godliness" that members of the community we starting to attribute to her.

I find extremely annoying the people who go out of their way to use "her" or "she" instead of "him" or "he". Seriously.

It's especially stupid when Satoshi is clearly a male name.

Joe_Bauers

hero member

Activity: 802

Merit: 1003

GCVMMWH

Quote

, but there is still the unbelievable perfect source code of version 0.01.

If the source code was perfect, we wouldn't be at version 0.10.1 Wink

Looking at the source code, to me, makes it pretty evident who wrote it. One of the main reasons that I am assuming Satoshi left is she was not liking the "godliness" that members of the community we starting to attribute to her.

franckuestein

legendary

Activity: 1960

Merit: 1130

Truth will out!

wow, thanks for the info @cyrusthegreat!
Do you think that we're stupid?

Quote from: cyrusthegreat on April 28, 2015, 08:28:35 AM

if you want to know how and why send me donations to make a documentary

Amph

legendary

Activity: 3248

Merit: 1070

Quote from: coins101 on April 30, 2015, 09:20:53 AM

Quote from: s2 on April 30, 2015, 06:21:50 AM

"Satoshi Nakamoto" is likely a made up name as a sign of respect to the people who made Bitcoin possible.
...

Its not a made up name at all. Its a real name, it's just not the creators real name

well this isn't known, it could be his real name if he is really one person and not multiple people that have developed bitcoin(i still have my doubt about this)

tyz

legendary

Activity: 3360

Merit: 1533

I guess, Satoshi Nakamoto is not one person. "He" is a group of persons. Look at the different writing styles of him here on the board and the released whitepaper. Probably it has been written by a ghostwriter, but there is still the unbelievable perfect source code of version 0.01.

coins101

legendary

Activity: 1456

Merit: 1000

Quote from: s2 on April 30, 2015, 06:21:50 AM

"Satoshi Nakamoto" is likely a made up name as a sign of respect to the people who made Bitcoin possible.
...

Its not a made up name at all. Its a real name, it's just not the creators real name

s2

full member

Activity: 198

Merit: 123

"Satoshi Nakamoto" is likely a made up name as a sign of respect to the people who made Bitcoin possible.

Look up the Sato-Tate conjecture for example, if you discover the other meanings perhaps just use proofofexistence to log that you've figured it out but don't publish your findings as others may enjoy the rabbit hole.

We aren't meant to know who Satoshi really is and I respect he/she/they want to remain anonymous, this name is a beautifully clever way to make that obvious.

cyrusthegreat

newbie

Activity: 6

Merit: 0

the question is can you prove that Gavin Andresen is not satoshi nakamoto?,well i can! but first you have to make donations even if you dont care ho is satoshi, the story is good and can have a huge impact on the price of bitcoin and thats my goal.

Bitcoin Explorer

hero member

Activity: 854

Merit: 500

Quote from: BillyBobZorton on April 28, 2015, 08:59:20 AM

Satoshi Nakamoto is probably someone still posting in here, under a moniker and most likely one of the main usual developers. It was probably planned to not want to have a public creator of Bitcoin to enforce the perception that Bitcoin is no one but everyone.

Yeah, he might still be lurking here, but we can't say. Lol at LitecoinGuy's pic

WhatTheGox

legendary

Activity: 812

Merit: 1000

Quote from: Agestorzrxx on April 29, 2015, 07:12:08 AM

I don't think he is satoshi, apparently, satoshi didn't want to reveal his identity, we may never know who is him, it's doesn't matter, he already left 5 years, bitcoin is still in development.

I reckon it was a group tbh which is why its been so hard to track down any one person, maybe 1 person did the final work and released a collaboration project.

Agestorzrxx

sr. member

Activity: 462

Merit: 250

I don't think he is satoshi, apparently, satoshi didn't want to reveal his identity, we may never know who is him, it's doesn't matter, he already left 5 years, bitcoin is still in development.

Kprawn

legendary

Activity: 1904

Merit: 1074

Why do you not just ask Obama, he carry the secret with him in the http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nuclear_football

When Gavin went to the CIA, he revealed the identity to the CIA and they added the name to the little black book. It's listed just below the line that says .... Who killed Kennedy - ###############

There, now you have a bigger and more interesting conspiracy theory. Grin

funtotry

sr. member

Activity: 420

Merit: 250

Ever wanted to run your own casino? PM me for info

Having the "no one owns bitcoin" thing is very good. Since there is no 1 famous creator of it, satoshi nakamoto is probably a fake name, people think the coin is just made "by the people", as they don't tie one person to it. If the US dollar was not stated it was made by the US, it would be though of the more "world currency", same thing with bitcoin.

tss

hero member

Activity: 742

Merit: 500

i thought it was hal finney Undecided

philipma1957

legendary

Activity: 4256

Merit: 8551

'The right to privacy matters'

Quote from: randy8777 on April 28, 2015, 09:34:02 PM

who cares. even if he is, he won't admit it. people here have too much free time. what i am interested in is that the developers bring bitcoin to the next level.

What is the next level for bitcoin? I am curious ?

Would it be made better for buyers using BTC?

How do you think we can upgrade coins so that the public uses them and wants them thus driving the price of them higher.

randy8777

legendary

Activity: 896

Merit: 1000

who cares. even if he is, he won't admit it. people here have too much free time. what i am interested in is that the developers bring bitcoin to the next level.

bennybong

hero member

Activity: 682

Merit: 500

Quote from: kingcolex on April 28, 2015, 02:35:26 PM

Quote from: S4VV4S on April 28, 2015, 10:38:19 AM

Quote from: bennybong on April 28, 2015, 10:37:31 AM

I think you guys are talking about the 'alert code' key. It is used to send an alert message to all bitcoin clients in the event of an emergency.

^^^^ This

How is it that an alert emergency key "controls bitcoin"

Exactly. It's not.

Topic: i found satoshi nakamoto (Read 3011 times)